It's not hard to figure being associated with svnla types reflects poorly, so pretending you still can't figure it only cements the association.
Associated... because you said so?
Man. You sure are great at arguing. Just keep insulting people for "associations" you made up based on nothing more than a shared disagreement with you and maybe, just maybe, we'll agree with you... out of shame of association with each other? Oh, I figured it out, but thatbonly makes sense in your twisted mind.
Newsflash: we think it would be a shame to be associated with you.
Why do you think you could shame us into agreeing with you? Doesn't that normally take pointed reasoning based on established facts? Oh yeah: you don't seem to know what those are either and keep thinking that you can establish them by your divine proclamation. Guess we are just treading water with that line of reasoning.