Originally posted by: error8
Originally posted by: MrK6
Originally posted by: error8
Originally posted by: MrK6
Really, an overclocked HD4850 >> an overclocked 9800GTX+.
Would you care to explain this? If both cards are equal and you start overclocking both, how will the 4850 become faster?
The HD4850 has much more overclocking headroom than a 9800GTX+ and it's easier to take it much further. It's not even close if you really overclock the hell out of each card.
Since you're not going to do anything about it here it is:
http://www.rbmods.com/Articles/Asus/4850_top/4.php
4850 overclocked to 780/1140 ( core/memory). It is a very nice overclock indeed, but it might be lower on OPs card, these numbers are not granted, they just give us an idea about what to expect, since any other overclock informations about this card are lacking.
Now for 9800GTX+ here is this thread:
http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=519786
It's an old thread, maybe just as old as OPs card, so this gives a good idea about the whole ocing stuff. You can find other threads about GTX+, that have the same numbers. Here is what a person got with his GTX+:
Core 860 mhz
Shader 1998 (unlinked) mhz
memory 1300 mhz.
Now, of course that 9800GTX+ is some 100mhz slower at stock then 4850, since at 738 mhz is as fast as the ATi card at 625 mhz. But the point is that the proportions are being kept, for the most part, when overclocking, so that just doesn't put 4850 in advantage here.