Originally posted by: AnandThenMan
Originally posted by: Creig
So what are these "tweaks and modifications" mentioned by DT and where did they disappear to between then and today?
Good question, but I guess consider the entire article. Quite a lot of it seems ripped from the pages of a mindless Nvidia marketing manual. Also consider that the conclusion was changed because it completely contradicted the numbers. A chart was updated because Anand "thinks" the proper ATI drivers were used (seems like if you are reviewing a card, you would know exactly what drivers you were dealing with)
The fact that no overclocking tests were done is odd. Even stranger is this from the last paragraph.
The overclock on the AMD hardware is fairly modest, but does make a difference and the same holds true for the GTX 275 products in early testing.
What? Modest overclocks on the AMD hardware? The thing was made to overclock, several sites are breaking the 1Ghz barrier. And of course overclocking makes a "difference" why wouldn't it? Strange, just strange.