HomeBrewerDude
Lifer
- Jan 18, 2001
- 14,465
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Sideswipe001
I fail to see where the article says anything about it being any kind of medical condition.
The problem here is that everyone is generalizing and making wild assumptions. Some people assume there's a medical condition involved, or that the child was born with partially developed reproductive organs. Some people are assuming there was nothing "odd" about the child physically. The aritcle doesn't specify, so speculating is pointless.
That being said, if there is NO physical evidence that 'she' shouldn't be a girl, then I believe the parents are screwing her up big time, and that the poor girl will be absolutely made fun of and confused for a long time.
On the other hand if there IS a physical condition (the child was born in a state where they weren't sure, and they just made the call) I can see this as being something healthy for the 'girl' in question. However, I would disagree with the parents decision to leave them in the same school. It would be much, much easier if they put 'her' into a new school to begin life as a boy.
I tend to believe that this is a parents mistake, however, in this instance, because of one fact:
She is still "physically" a girl according to the article. If she is really a boy, and the doctors are trying to "fix" that mistake, why not really physically make the change?
I would just like to point out the fact that you think speculating is pointless and then you proceeded to speculate.
:beer: to you!