- Nov 21, 2004
- 133
- 0
- 0
OK, before anyone even thinks of flaming here, just hold on for a few sentences. I build all my own systems, however at work we are looking at ordering a workstation, and quite frankly, I don?t want to be the one supporting it. Everyone bags on Dell, however I feel for a workplace environment, when money is less of an issue, and TOTAL reliability is of utmost importance, I think they?re fine. I have had nothing but good experiences with their higher end systems.
Now that that?s out of the way, if anyone still feels like flaming, please go HERE
My question is this: I?m looking at the Precision 670, and I need 2 gigs of memory. This thing comes standard with 512MB, which I agree is ridiculous considering it?s their flagship workstation. Anyway, I?m in France, and currently they have these two options:
4x512 for 420? extra
2x1024 for 940? extra
(The euro is currently more valuable than the dollar, however for me, I consider them about equal. This is because in general, an item that costs $100 in the states costs 100? in France.)
Knowing that both of these prices are fairly elevated compared to what?s on the consumer market for RAM, my question pertains to performance. Being an A64 owner myself, I?m really only up to date on memory configurations for AMD chips. I searched around a bit, and I seemed to read that for newer Intel chipsets, 4x512 actually provides more performance than 2x1024 (when you?re not overclocking, which I won?t be).
Is this true? Would there be any reason to pay the outrageous 520? MORE for the 2x1024?
It?s not me paying, however we have a budget, and quite frankly I?d rather stick that 520? into the LCD.
Thanks,
Nathan
Now that that?s out of the way, if anyone still feels like flaming, please go HERE
My question is this: I?m looking at the Precision 670, and I need 2 gigs of memory. This thing comes standard with 512MB, which I agree is ridiculous considering it?s their flagship workstation. Anyway, I?m in France, and currently they have these two options:
4x512 for 420? extra
2x1024 for 940? extra
(The euro is currently more valuable than the dollar, however for me, I consider them about equal. This is because in general, an item that costs $100 in the states costs 100? in France.)
Knowing that both of these prices are fairly elevated compared to what?s on the consumer market for RAM, my question pertains to performance. Being an A64 owner myself, I?m really only up to date on memory configurations for AMD chips. I searched around a bit, and I seemed to read that for newer Intel chipsets, 4x512 actually provides more performance than 2x1024 (when you?re not overclocking, which I won?t be).
Is this true? Would there be any reason to pay the outrageous 520? MORE for the 2x1024?
It?s not me paying, however we have a budget, and quite frankly I?d rather stick that 520? into the LCD.
Thanks,
Nathan