The reason why a lot of people have started to use "silvers" is because the Pthalocyanine dye is
assumed to be the most stable. FYI, there aren't that many dye manufacturers. A lot of the CD-R's that you
think are made by some brands are actually produced by a handful of the same manufacturers.
The specific
CD-R Ident info on these "generic" CD-R's:
ATIP: 97m 27s 28f
Disc Manufacturer: Princo Co.
Assumed Dye type: Phthalocyanine (Type 8)
Media type: CD-Recordable
Recording Speeds: min. unknown - max. unknown
nominal Capacity: 657.42MB (74m 50s 01f / LBA: 336601)
Man, I've been burning CD's years before the "silvers" even existed. I've ALWAYS used high quality CD-R's like Kodak and Mitsui (and still use Mitsui for audio discs that I plan to keep).
A friend of mine has been using these Princo's for over two years. Even though they were cheaper, I've always resisted. However, after getting CD's from him for over two years, and none of them going bad, I think these Princo's are alright. The truth is that ANY disc will develop errors if you don't treat them well, regardless of their quality.
BTW, if you REALLY want to learn more about CD-R media quality, go to
http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/faq07.html. There's also a much shorter write-up
http://thetechnozone.com/pcbuyersguide/hardware/storage/CD-R_reliability_reports.html.
IMO, you shouldn't really comment on the quality of any CD-R unless you have had some experience with the media. I won't claim that these are any where close to the quality that Mitsui silvers are, but I will tell you that I personally don't mind using these Princo's for certain applications.
AND that's saying a lot knowing me...