Hey Zeus
Banned
- Dec 31, 2009
- 780
- 0
- 0
Sucks they used the 512mb versions
I think HD5750 is a much better value than this card (especially if ATI eventually releases a $109 512 MB version).
However, folks that don't want to use a PCI-E 6 pin power connector will probably like this product quite a bit.
IMO computer no one should waste there money on a 512m version these days
true but if you have a small monitor, 10-20 bucks more for the 5750 512mb is a WAY better purchase than the 5670. at 1280 and the settings this card can run, 512mb is enough for every game out there except maybe GTA 4.IMO computer no one should waste there money on a 512m version these days
IMO computer no one should waste there money on a 512m version these days
Yeah, noone should waste thier money on a 512mb card because everyone has a 24" LCD these days. Noone in thier right mind would buy a card like this and still own a 19 - 22" LCD, that would just be stooped .
to buy a $100 card to power a $90 - $125 LCD, noo you have to own a $300 - $500+ LCD before you can spend $100 on a GPU.....
Do i detect a hint of sarcasm?
And on the third day he finally figured it out.
I'm sorry, I haven't slept for shit the last few days and reading about this epic bag of fail we are calling the 5670 is kinda depressing as I was honestly hoping for a lot more from ATI on this. Since they failed me with this debacle I had damned well better see a single-slot 5750 green card ( quick, hide it from Hey Zeus ).
Don't be sorry. You amused me and the more and more i read about these cards the more i'm leaning towards a 5850
I cant find them at newegg at least not with the regular search.The most impressive thing about the 5670 is that it seems to be INSTOCK everywhere which is amazing if you ask me.
I cant find them at newegg at least not with the regular search.
$90 is $10 too much and the GT240 GDDR5 card needs to be $80 as well
$90 is $10 too much and the GT240 GDDR5 card needs to be $80 as well
I don't get why the Anandtech review goes on and on about the 9800GT in the conclusion, but doesn't even include it in the benchmark comparisons? What sense does that make?