EDIT: So there may be a nugget of truth to this. I still find it hard to believe as there would be very different cache latencies and therefore performance in certain situations.
Proof? The performance would be quite different. Just look at the 3300X compared to the 3100. I've never heard of a dual chiplet 5600X or 5800X.
EDIT: So there may be a nugget of truth to this. I still find it hard to believe as there would be very different cache latencies and therefore performance in certain situations.
He lives in bulldozer era, just like his fellow Henry, unfortunately for them AMD is in excellent shape now, they bought Xilinx and Pensando which is biggest purchase in the history, They are growing at a rapid rate every year, and Intel fans will have to accept that, no more small AMD, they will fight evenly with Intel every year, and seeing future data center products, I predict a bright future for them and more $billions in wallet.You don't know crap do you? A 5800X only has one CCD, just like the 5700X. It is not a 4 + 4 design. Yet you continue to bash AMD and promote Intel while claiming that you will continue to buy AMD. This post sums it up perfectly.
Let's use that and replace CPU's with TV's.
X brand TV's have had a good run, but Y brand TV's are doing way better. Y brand TV's will advance at a rate the X brand TV's simply cannot. Yet I will but brand X's TV within the next year, validating my opinion.
You can't make this stuff up! I'm going to buy into what I think is an inferior platform despite Intel being so great?
What Techpowerup is describing is a different thing. The parts described there haven't both CCDs active. Only one of the CCD works, the other is completely disabled. These may be parts that were built to be 5900X or 5950X but for some reasons (packaging scrap) don't work as intended and thus they are recycled as 5600X or 5800X, and behave as them.
I/O interfaces essentially can't really be shrunken. That's makes IODs big.And they need to shrink the IOD.
Please explain the significant increase in power draw for the 5800x. 105w tdp vs. 65w tdp for the 5700x? The max boost power draw for the 5700x is 76w (PPT) vs. 142w (PPT) for the 5800x. The 5800x offers 100mhz more on the boost clock and a 400mhz higher base clock than 5700x. 5800x owners have to manually under volt their CPU's to achieve power usages and temps similar to the 5700x. You can manually OC a 5700x (B2 stepping) to 5800x stock levels and beyond without the same stock power usage of the 5800x.You don't know crap do you? A 5800X only has one CCD, just like the 5700X. It is not a 4 + 4 design. Yet you continue to bash AMD and promote Intel while claiming that you will continue to buy AMD. This post sums it up perfectly.
Let's use that and replace CPU's with TV's.
X brand TV's have had a good run, but Y brand TV's are doing way better. Y brand TV's will advance at a rate the X brand TV's simply cannot. Yet I will but brand X's TV within the next year, validating my opinion.
You can't make this stuff up! I'm going to buy into what I think is an inferior platform despite Intel being so great?
Please explain the significant increase in power draw for the 5800x.
Here's the crap you need to know:I don't know crap as you said. Explain the increased power draw of the 5800x over the 5700x?
Not only 5800X owners can undervolt their CPUs, ALL CPUs can be undervolted provided the users have good quality components in their builds and they're willing to eat into the safety margins put in place to ensure reliability using a myriad of PC components and cooling conditions.Then explain why 5800x owners can manually under volt their CPU's without any issues.
What Techpowerup is describing is a different thing. The parts described there haven't both CCDs active. Only one of the CCD works, the other is completely disabled. These may be parts that were built to be 5900X or 5950X but for some reasons (packaging scrap) don't work as intended and thus they are recycled as 5600X or 5800X, and behave as them.
Please explain the significant increase in power draw for the 5800x. 105w tdp vs. 65w tdp for the 5700x? The max boost power draw for the 5700x is 76w (PPT) vs. 142w (PPT) for the 5800x. The 5800x offers 100mhz more on the boost clock and a 400mhz higher base clock than 5700x. 5800x owners have to manually under volt their CPU's to achieve power usages and temps similar to the 5700x. You can manually OC a 5700x (B2 stepping) to 5800x stock levels and beyond without the same stock power usage of the 5800x.
In past generations AMD explained their binning process. The 3600's were cut down chips that could not pass the binning process for higher level chips but worked perfectly fine for a 6 core 12 thread CPU. You know better than me. I don't know crap as you said. Explain the increased power draw of the 5800x over the 5700x? Then explain why 5800x owners can manually under volt their CPU's without any issues. Basic math tells us that a 16 core 32 thread Zen 3 CPU is double an 8 core 16 thread Zen 3 CPU. So cutting in half or disabling 8 cores is not the same thing but the results are the same. The 5950x is the best binned CPU's. If you have CPU's that do not pass the binning process for the 5950x, they cut that chip in half giving you a 5800x.
FYI, I bought into the AMD platform from the original (R31200) Zen CPU. When people struggle to upgrade an AMD bios on older boards. I pop in my R3 1200.
You quote a person not directly in this conversation stating exactly what I said about how AMD bins their chips. You wrongly assume that AMD makes CPU's on silicon platters for specific models. They make Zen 3 chips on the same silicon and bin them according to their performance after manufacturing. You should second guess yourself.Thanks. That's what I get for second guessing myself and not reading the whole thing first.
OK, explain the reason why the 3700X is 65W vs the 3800X at 105W? @coercitiv already has this covered though.
You quote a person not directly in this conversation stating exactly what I said about how AMD bins their chips. You wrongly assume that AMD makes CPU's on silicon platters for specific models. They make Zen 3 chips on the same silicon and bin them according to their performance after manufacturing. You should second guess yourself.
When I write what I write, I ballpark my statements until someone insults my knowledge of how things work. Below you can see a massive 1-2% performance increase that contradicts the Gamers Nexus single slide offered by another forum member. The max speed for the 5800x is 4.75ghz and the max speed for the 5700x is 4.7ghz in the CPU benchmark submissions.
In the past AMD admitted they juice their chips because some CPU's performed better with lower power and other required more power in their binning process. They did this to maximize silicon yields. Juicing chips means they apply more stock voltage than required. They do this to offset the limited number of CPU's that require more voltage. I have no issue with this practice.
During Zen 2, review sites said to skip the 3800x because the 5700x was a better value. In Zen 3, AMD removed the 5700x SKU until well over a year after the release of Zen 3.
On a side note I said that ram is ram and the memory issues that plagued AMD in earlier versions of the Zen architecture (B350/X370) were recently fixed in the latest AGESA bios. This means that all Zen 2 and later CPU's can run memory @ 3800mhz without infinity fabric issues. I would also like to point out that TSMC silicon has been excellent. AMD used to own Glo Flo and sold it off when they were almost bankrupt.
I am also the forum member who told people to buy 3600mhz binned ram and call it a day. All 3600mhz can run 3800mhz speeds without any issues. To get the most out of Ryzen CPU's you want your memory running @ 3800mhz. But I know nothing.
I am an Intel fanboy. My last intel build was in 2013.
Maybe you should buy Intel more often, if only to get a better grasp of what you're talking about.I am an Intel fanboy. My last intel build was in 2013.
userbenchmark.com is not a site you want to quote seriously if you don't want your knowledge to be insulted.When I write what I write, I ballpark my statements until someone insults my knowledge of how things work. Below you can see a massive 1-2% performance increase that contradicts the Gamers Nexus single slide offered by another forum member.
UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X vs 5800X
Maybe you should buy Intel more often, if only to get a better grasp of what you're talking about.
Las bit of advice, never quote Userbenchmark data again. That "Effective speed" rating you see is NOT what you think it is.
You quote a person not directly in this conversation stating exactly what I said about how AMD bins their chips. You wrongly assume that AMD makes CPU's on silicon platters for specific models. They make Zen 3 chips on the same silicon and bin them according to their performance after manufacturing. You should second guess yourself.
When I write what I write, I ballpark my statements until someone insults my knowledge of how things work. Below you can see a massive 1-2% performance increase that contradicts the Gamers Nexus single slide offered by another forum member. The max speed for the 5800x is 4.75ghz and the max speed for the 5700x is 4.7ghz in the CPU benchmark submissions.
In the past AMD admitted they juice their chips because some CPU's performed better with lower power and other required more power in their binning process. They did this to maximize silicon yields. Juicing chips means they apply more stock voltage than required. They do this to offset the limited number of CPU's that require more voltage. I have no issue with this practice.
During Zen 2, review sites said to skip the 3800x because the 5700x was a better value. In Zen 3, AMD removed the 5700x SKU until well over a year after the release of Zen 3.
On a side note I said that ram is ram and the memory issues that plagued AMD in earlier versions of the Zen architecture (B350/X370) were recently fixed in the latest AGESA bios. This means that all Zen 2 and later CPU's can run memory @ 3800mhz without infinity fabric issues. I would also like to point out that TSMC silicon has been excellent. AMD used to own Glo Flo and sold it off when they were almost bankrupt.
I am also the forum member who told people to buy 3600mhz binned ram and call it a day. All 3600mhz can run 3800mhz speeds without any issues. To get the most out of Ryzen CPU's you want your memory running @ 3800mhz. But I know nothing.
I am an Intel fanboy. My last intel build was in 2013.
There is no user benchmark review. It's called a benchmark like Cinebench which is a waste of time. It's simple an apples to apples comparison running the same feature set. The reason people hate userbenchmark simply for a snapshot. In the past it was always slanted towards Intel CPU's. We are comparing Zen 3 AMD CPU's vs AMD CPU's. I look at the best benchmarks and clocks. It's not scientific.Its been awhile since I've read a userbenchmark review. Their take on the 5800x in 2020 is rather hilarious both then and now. "It still offers far better value than a 5900x".
View attachment 63693
Now I can see why your post count is so high in just 5 years here on the forum.userbenchmark.com is not a site you want to quote seriously if you don't want your knowledge to be insulted.
There is no user benchmark review. It's called a benchmark like Cinebench which is a waste of time. It's simple an apples to apples comparison running the same feature set. The reason people hate userbenchmark simply for a snapshot. In the past it was always slanted towards Intel CPU's. We are comparing Zen 3 AMD CPU's vs AMD CPU's. I look at the best benchmarks and clocks. It's not scientific.
They are the laughing stock among benchmark sites.
Some threads for your entertainment (all between 2019-2020, after which we as a forum apparently finally stopped caring about the site):
Ryzen 3000: userbenchmark changed the score weights in favor of intel
As predicted benchmark tool(s) are changed after Ryzen 3000 (to favor intel) The first one, and there is always a reason why they needed to change it now. https://wccftech.com/userbenchmark-updates-cpu-ranking-by-lowering-multi-core-importance-and-raising-single-core/forums.anandtech.comQuestion - Could Userbenchmark be more dishonest?
First, they changed their scoring methodology just after Zen 2 came out. Now, I was looking for a laptop for my sister, and was searching for info about the Ryzen 3500U. These clowns try to claim that a Whiskey Lake chip would be better for gaming than a Ryzen 3500U. She certainly doesn't need...forums.anandtech.comDiscussion - UserBenchmark: 4 cores are enough
UserBenchmark.com apparently removed 64 thread comparison from their CPU benchmark, maximum is now 8. I guess nobody needs more than 4 cores, right??? :)forums.anandtech.comQuestion - More anti-AMD "Stealth Marketing" by UserBenchmark...
Basically, a blog post by "CPUPro", I guess, on UserBenchmark, talking about the new 3300X CPU, and basically dissing it, and saying that AMD is now effectively walking back their "moar coars" marketing, and now saying that "only quad-core is enough", and then claiming that the (as of yet...forums.anandtech.com
You can cry all day, but you won't see AMD bulldozer era again, and learn to live with it, Pat Gelsinger also accepted that, you should too.Now I can see why your post count is so high in just 5 years here on the forum.
Great so we are now arguing over how a 5950x is cut in half to create a 5800x. I can live with that. Instead of cutting vertically, we are cutting it horizontally making a a 2x CCD 4 core vs. a 8 core single CCD. But power consumption issues still comes about. Normally people add power to get better performance. In the case of the 5800x they are reducing power to get it inline with the power consumption of a 5700x. On paper the 5800x should be a better chip than the 5700x. In reality the extra 5800x (50mhz) after manually overclocking 5700x utilizes nearly the same results.OK so now we're completely forget that we were talking about the 5800X being a 4+4 CPU while the 5700X was a "true" 8 core. That fell apart really fast so now we're trying to argue TDP. Userbenchmark is not a source anyone should use. Since I can't find a review of the 5700X that tested power, I'll do the next best thing.
See the performance of the 5700X vs the 5800X in multithreading.
"The multi-threaded results reveal that the Ryzen 7 5800X is 12% faster than the stock Ryzen 7 5700X, but engaging PBO shrinks the delta between the chips to less than one percent. But, again, the 5700X and 5800X are remarkably similar after tuning."
So there is a performance difference at stock that PBO largely eliminates. I guess PBO just bumps the clock and power up to near 5800X levels? Nah, the 5700X uses less power because its a true 8 core.
And why are you bringing RAM into this? I never mentioned RAM and agree with what you said about it. I also never called you an Intel fanboy, but your posts just do not make sense.
Reddit has a reputation that is less than stellar. Being banned from reddit is like being discredited by the National Enquirer in favor of the New York Post. For the record, I did not say userbenchmark was a complete and comprehensive system review. It's a quick benchmark that assess your system.
Says about all you need to know.