There is no user benchmark review. It's called a benchmark like Cinebench which is a waste of time. It's simple an apples to apples comparison running the same feature set. The reason people hate userbenchmark simply for a snapshot. In the past it was always slanted towards Intel CPU's. We are comparing Zen 3 AMD CPU's vs AMD CPU's. I look at the best benchmarks and clocks. It's not scientific.
Well said for an alt account.Don't feed the troll, and stick to the topic.
Says about all you need to know.
Just because you use alt accounts extensively, it doesn't mean others use too, grow up and accept that you won't see AMD bulldozer era again.Well said for an alt account.
I like amd products i like both intel and amd.. where did you get the impression i didnt like amd ?He lives in bulldozer era, just like his fellow Henry, unfortunately for them AMD is in excellent shape now, they bought Xilinx and Pensando which is biggest purchase in the history, They are growing at a rapid rate every year, and Intel fans will have to accept that, no more small AMD, they will fight evenly with Intel every year, and seeing future data center products, I predict a bright future for them and more $billions in wallet.
Wow, you know it's bad when the Intel reddit has banned userbenchmark.
Jeesh, for one, you liked the spammers post about Intel that got banned. Not to mention everything you post is liking Intel and hating AMD.I like amd products i like both intel and amd.. where did you get the impression i didnt like amd ?
This should give us an idea to the upper limit to the costs of this tech. Looking to compare 6C > 6C v-cache > 8C > 8C v-cache, etc, prices.More Zen3D coming for AM4
AMD to Reveal Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Ryzen 9 5900X3D with up to 200MB of Cache (128MB 3D Stacked) Next Month? | Hardware Times
A while back, it was reported that AMD might launch additional Zen 3 SKUs leveraging the 3D V-Cache technology. It would seem that that rumor is indeed true. Well-reputed tipster @Greymon55 has stated that there will be “several new products” headed to the Zen 3D family next month. There’s no...www.hardwaretimes.com
This should give us an idea to the upper limit to the costs of this tech. Looking to compare 6C > 6C v-cache > 8C > 8C v-cache, etc, prices.
Why not now? 5900X is still a Top of the line CPU the 5900X3D Would game as good as the 5800X3D while providing better MT performance5900X3D? Ohh. Interesting. That would have been nice a few months ago!
This is kind of surprising. I guess the supply and demand for Milan die must be manageable now.More Zen3D coming for AM4
AMD to Reveal Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Ryzen 9 5900X3D with up to 200MB of Cache (128MB 3D Stacked) Next Month? | Hardware Times
A while back, it was reported that AMD might launch additional Zen 3 SKUs leveraging the 3D V-Cache technology. It would seem that that rumor is indeed true. Well-reputed tipster @Greymon55 has stated that there will be “several new products” headed to the Zen 3D family next month. There’s no...www.hardwaretimes.com
Unless its correct that these chips failed to go into Milan CPU's, then it would make sense to use everything they can to make money and sell chips.This is kind of surprising. I guess the supply and demand for Milan die must be manageable now.
Price...!A 5600X3D is more curious. If they're going to make a 5900X3D (and not a 5950X3D) it wouldn't be hard to use some of those chiplets for a single chiplet part, but I'm not sure why they would just put them all towards a two chiplet part considering the 5800X3D has the market covered as far as anyone who doesn't need or want more than 8 cores is concerned.
If I recall correctly, the original 5900X3D prototype they showed had pretty good performance in games, possibly higher than the current 5800X3D. Maybe AMD really wants some of those would-be-12900KS-buyers to defect and later seal the deal to always-AMD with Zen 4.why they would just put them all towards a two chiplet part
Same gaming performance, but impressive application performance that take advantage of the stacked 3D RAMIf I recall correctly, the original 5900X3D prototype they showed had pretty good performance in games, possibly higher than the current 5800X3D. Maybe AMD really wants some of those would-be-12900KS-buyers to defect and later seal the deal to always-AMD with Zen 4.
Note that 5600X3D is reported/rumored to only add 32MB, so only half of the v cache. If true it's pretty much the dumping ground for all X3D dies where parts of the v cache broke, but at least half of it was still salvageable.A 5600X3D is more curious. If they're going to make a 5900X3D (and not a 5950X3D) it wouldn't be hard to use some of those chiplets for a single chiplet part, but I'm not sure why they would just put them all towards a two chiplet part considering the 5800X3D has the market covered as far as anyone who doesn't need or want more than 8 cores is concerned.
Same gaming performance, but impressive application performance that take advantage of the stacked 3D RAM
That's a pretty good use case. Heavy multi-taskers.It probably helps out with general system performance if a lot of applications are running because more of their data can stay in the cache, but that's harder to measure.
It would be interesting to see if most of the 15% average games can be had with half of the 3D cache. I believe there could be a sweet spot for gaming(Keeping in mind that the 3D V cache was design for HPC apps and not games so the Full 64 is for that purpose and not gaming) and 32 MiB might be the "Sweet" spot.Note that 5600X3D is reported/rumored to only add 32MB, so only half of the v cache. If true it's pretty much the dumping ground for all X3D dies where parts of the v cache broke, but at least half of it was still salvageable.