(754) Newcastles vs. (939) Winchesters

Chosonman

Golden Member
Jan 24, 2005
1,136
0
0
Ok, for the last time. These are the differences between Socket 754 Newcastles vs. Socket 939 Winchester. AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH UPGRADABILITY.

Here's a disclaimer: This thread is not about socket type being is better than the other. It is to show how both are very similiar in performance. The ultimate choice is up to you and you alone.

Summary
754 offers better value for those who don't upgrade..those buy a new complete new box every 3-5years and out with the old. 754 also offer a 3-5% loss in performance compared with 939 at same clock speeds, but still presenting a better value since 754 parts are clocked higher to begin with and priced much cheaper than 3-5%.

Performance:
Both types of processors are close in performance.
Please review the chart below for further questions.
CPU Charts

Newcastles run at a faster clock speed. The they can run more tasks at once so they are slightly faster when Audio/Video editing/compiling and multitasking.

Winchesters have slightly better memory management and are slightly faster when it comes to games.

Price
They are very close in price with the Newcastle core being slightly cheaper ($25) than a Winchester core. The difference in the price of motherboards tend to be much greater with Nforce 4 motherboard selling for about $170.00 now while an Nforce3 motherboard sells for about $80.00.

"Pci-e and Dual Channel RAM"
To gain the advantage of PCI-e and Dual Channel RAM one should buy a Nforce4 motherboard. That will increase the price difference between the 754 and 939 processors close to $100.00. Bear in mind for little more than $100.00 one could upgrade from a 6600GT to a 6800GT or add 1 more GIG of memory among other things that will increase performance more noticably.
Dual channel RAM is a very good selling point if you were selling AMD processors. But Dual Channel's translation into performance is very neglegable, There is about a 5% improvement in overall performance which is more than made up by the faster clock speeds of the 754 CPU's. In that case having a faster clock speed would be better.

Quote: originally posted by Zebo:
"I have both 754 and 939. One at 2650Mhz, the other at 2655Mhz.. Performance is indescerable between the sockets without using select benchmarks. and even then only insignifigant in a couple tests...Mainly games.

Basically bandwith mean little to A64 due to it's incredibe low latency of it's architecture which benefits both sockets similarly."

For more information read
Zebo's memory Test

"939 is better because it will be made into dual core."
There are always rumors saying this or that about what might be. But speculation is only worth while in the stock market, but not when it comes to building a system. Here's the answer "Dual core will not come to the Wichester core." The Winchester core is not optimized for dual core systems and will not be used in dual core systems in the future. Also, consider the fact chipmakers make more money when there is no upgrade path. History has shown us that upgrade paths are very often distrupted by even minor changes in chip makers designs.

For those of you still not convinced. Check out the AMD roadmap. It clearly shows that the Toledo and not the Winchester will be dual core for desktops. In addition AMD will come out with at least 3 more .09nm chips from now till then. (Socket types have yet to be determined) AMD Road Map

"939 Winchester are more upgradable"
Again, upgradablilty is subjective and will be determined by the individual.
Studies have shown more than 80% of people do not upgrade their computer for at least 3 years or more. If they do upgrade most upgrade the video card only.

"What about those people who upgrade more often?"
It's not cost effect for anyone to upgrade every 6 months. That's a choice only hard core enthusiasts chose to make. For the rest of us the life of a computer is analogous to its performance. When it comes time to upgrade similar performing systems will need to be upgraded at about the same time.

"People buy computers for performance and not the socket type."
Here's another way of saying it. Technology is so dynamic and unpredicable in 3 years it will not matter if one owns a Newcastle or Winchester. Chances are by that time an upgrade would include both a new motherboard and processor regardless which socket type it is.

People have brought up the cost of upgrading. Here's the short and skinny.
If one were to buy a system today and upgrade the CPU and Graphics card in 3 years the only difference between a 939 PCI-e owner and a 754 owner is that the 754 owner may want to upgrade his motherboard also. But that's not a problem. Here's why....

1) There is hardly any cost benefit between getting new motherboard now rather than later. In fact costs are likely to run less if one were to buy one later. And considering the price of the newer nforc4 motherboards can be as much as $100.00 higher than an NForce3 motherboard it could be an advantage to buy one later.
2) The 754 buyer has the option to buy newer technology because it could be integrated into the new motherboard.
3) The 939 owner will have to upgrade again sooner rather than later because the technology on his motherboard is older.
4) And finally the 754 owner can use the old CPU, MOBO, and Graphics card for a secondary system or sell it or give it to a family member. While the 939 owner has an old CPU and Graphics are that won't be much use to anyone else unless they purchased a new motherboard to use them those components.

Also, here's a bold perdiction that I'm willing to bet just about everyone will agree on. The next big leap in performance will not happen on a (939) Winchester Core CPU....

Even if you upgrade your 939 to a less expensive FX chip in the future you're upgrading to negligable performance gains. What does that mean? You wont notice a thing. Wow that's pretty revealing isn't it? And guess what else? You'll have spent almost $200.00 or more preparing and upgrading that system for a few nano second improvement in performance over the system you built today.

When is comes down to it, if you don't mind spending an extra the extra cash on a socket 939 that's fine for you. But buying one over the other solely because you think or some tells you " it's upgradable" is fairytale thinking and should not be a consideration. There is no reason not to buy the best performing system you can right now regardless what socket type it is.

 

Monkey muppet

Golden Member
Sep 28, 2004
1,241
0
0
I think I fall in to that catergory you have been talking about.

I bought:

A64 3000+ 1.8Ghz (939).
Nforce 4 board
PCI-X 6600GT
1GB 400mhz (value)

For the reason of ugradability for some one on a budget:

Six months down the line I can change either the CPU FX-57?? and still work, or:
change the GPU to a 256mb next gen Nvidia 7000???
or decide to OC for a little bit.

Does that make my desicions of purchasing those part wrong????
 

Ike0069

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2003
4,276
2
76
Originally posted by: Chosonman
Newcastle run at a faster clock speed. The they can run more tasks at once so they are slightly faster when Audio/Video editing/compiling and multitasking.

Winchesters have slightly better memory management and are slightly faster when it comes to games.


Nice post, but.......
AMD does make Newcastle 939's also. You can't make those generalizations between the cores, only the sockets. Yes Winchesters need slightly less power, and therefore run cooler, but a 939 Newcastle has the same "speed" as a 939 Winchester.
 

spazo

Senior member
Apr 5, 2004
344
0
0
I may be wrong on this but it seems the Winchesters are better overclockers then the newcastles...
 

Chosonman

Golden Member
Jan 24, 2005
1,136
0
0
Originally posted by: Monkey muppet
I think I fall in to that catergory you have been talking about.

I bought:

A64 3000+ 1.8Ghz (939).
Nforce 4 board
PCI-X 6600GT
1GB 400mhz (value)

For the reason of ugradability for some one on a budget:

Six months down the line I can change either the CPU FX-57?? and still work, or:
change the GPU to a 256mb next gen Nvidia 7000???
or decide to OC for a little bit.

Does that make my desicions of purchasing those part wrong????



No,
But, I made several points about individuals havinging different needs and those who will build a system piece-meal and not upgrade for 3 years. You obviously don't fall into the general category.

But consider this.
Say someone who bought a 754 3000 system did the same in 6 months. Six months from now he will buy a fx-57 and he buys a GeForce 7000 also. For the sake of arguement let's just say he want's PCI-e for the GeForce 7000 and needs to upgrade his motherboard . So the real difference is he needs to get a new motherboard and you don't. But in the meantime 2 things could have happend. The 754 builder could have bought a better graphics card with the money he saved or he could have kept it and saved it.

If he had saved the money he could now buy a newer motherboard with perhaps newer feature for less money than what you originally spent. (Market conditions being what they are)

 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Just to be clear, you need 939 for PCI-E right? And PCI-E is a newer standard even if AGP will be around for a while right?
 

Amaroque

Platinum Member
Jan 2, 2005
2,178
0
0
Originally posted by: Chosonman

If you're not getting an nforce4 motherboard and don't mind spending an extra $25.00 on a socket 939 that's fine too. But buying one over the other solely because you think or some tells you " it's upgradable" is fairytale thinking and should not be a consideration.

The bottom line when it comes to upgradability is. Unless you don't have the money to build an entire system right now an you want to build in piece meal there is no reason not to by the best performing system you can regardless what socket type it is.

This thread is hardly definitive. :roll:

Why wouldn't I spend the extra $25, as you put it?

S754 will be phased out by the end of the year, except for Semprons.

IMO You're selling yourself short if you buy a S754 MB.
 

Chosonman

Golden Member
Jan 24, 2005
1,136
0
0
Originally posted by: Amaroque

This thread is hardly definitive. :roll:

Why wouldn't I spend the extra $25, as you put it?

S754 will be phased out by the end of the year, except for Semprons.

IMO You're selling yourself short if you buy a S754 MB.

And how are you selling yourself short when the point is to buy the most performance possible.

Every individual has their own needs and who's to say what you want in your next computer system is the same as what the other person wants? And how can you honestly tell someone by spending even $25.00 they are buying that much more performance. Bear in mind again $25.00 doesn't include PCI-e or dual channel RAM. You'll need to spend close to $100.00 to get those. And even those features won't improve performance dramatically.

I'm not saying not to get a 939 Socket CPU. Just that the arguments for getting a 939 over a 754 need to be more closely considered. It's not as simple as saying one is "more upgradable" or there is a HUGE performance advantage. Because there is very little.

The real advantage of socket 939 chips may lie in the fact that they can be installed in a PCI-e motherboard. But in order to do so you'll have to spend close to $100.00 more for a PCI-e motherboard. At present time.

And like all things. Time will be the difference in how true this model holds up. As prices and products change so will the model. But the fact remains that "upgradability" is a fairtale and nothing more.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Just to be clear, you need 939 for PCI-E right? And PCI-E is a newer standard even if AGP will be around for a while right?

Anyone?
 

ts3433

Platinum Member
Jun 29, 2004
2,731
0
0
(Edit: I suppose I'm quite prone to slip-ups... my opinion/viewpoint was bad enough to be self-deemed as "incorrect." That's saying a lot. :laugh: My praise to you, Chosonman.)
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Amaroque
Originally posted by: Chosonman

If you're not getting an nforce4 motherboard and don't mind spending an extra $25.00 on a socket 939 that's fine too. But buying one over the other solely because you think or some tells you " it's upgradable" is fairytale thinking and should not be a consideration.

The bottom line when it comes to upgradability is. Unless you don't have the money to build an entire system right now an you want to build in piece meal there is no reason not to by the best performing system you can regardless what socket type it is.

This thread is hardly definitive. :roll:

Why wouldn't I spend the extra $25, as you put it?

S754 will be phased out by the end of the year, except for Semprons.

IMO You're selling yourself short if you buy a S754 MB.

And your AGP slot option will be phased out now.

Your DDR will be phased out next year.

Your 939 socket will be phased out with 1271.

Basically you're only buying a few more months of phased in... In other words not that much better off than a 754 buyer (except you spent more)
 

Ike0069

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2003
4,276
2
76
I agree AMD gave the S939 too much credit. A 2.0 GHz S939 is not faster than a 2.2 GHz S754.
That being said, If you buy a S939 3000+ now, you will be able to upgrade to (at a minimum) 4000+ when the price drops. MB and RAM can be reused. And AMD does plan to make faster S939 chips before they move to a different socket. You don't have the same upgrade options for a S754.
Now if one buys now and doesn't plan to upgrade anything for at least 2 years, then S754 could be the way to go.
Of course if you like to OC, then the Winchester is absolutely the best option, and you can't get that in S754.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
don't mind spending an extra $25.00 on a socket 939 that's fine too.

That's right nothing wrong with either choice but it's a lot more than $25 differential.

Even at the low end, the smallest differential in price, it's $60

Skt 754@1.8
AMD ATHLON 64 2800+ RETAILED BOX + EPOX 8KDA3J = $190

Skt939@1.8
AMD ATHLON 64 3000+ (939 PIN) RETAILED BOX + EPOX 9NDA3J = $250


And we don't even wan't to start with NF4 PCIe boards which cost >$130 alone.
 

Amaroque

Platinum Member
Jan 2, 2005
2,178
0
0
For the "price conscious" 754 would be a better choice. Like I've said before in other posts, $100 to me, even $200 to me, isn't the same as it is to you. $200 isn't that big of a deal to me. Also, I plan to switch to an FX as soon as that series migrates to 90nm.

You can also argue that 1024 cache vs 512 cache doesn't do a whole lot for performance. This is true, but for people who want the fastest AMD has to offer, it's an option. But, not with 754 it isn't.

Regarding your original post... I think AMD kind of messed up. They weren't expecting performance to be so close (between sockets) at the same clock speeds. I don't think AMD expected the on die memory controller to be as efficient as it is.

I also think AMD will have a hard time improving on the current lineup, with the currently available technology.

They will be rectifying the (754) mistake though, when they relegate 754 to Semprons only.

If you don't upgrade your CPU every couple few months, and plan to keep your current system for a while, 754 is a good bandwagon to jump on.

For the type of user I am, 754 doesn't fit.

I'm not trying to dig at your thread, but maybe you should have made the topic summary "The opinionated thread." and not "The definitive thread."
 

Amaroque

Platinum Member
Jan 2, 2005
2,178
0
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
And your AGP slot option will be phased out now.

Your DDR will be phased out next year.

Your 939 socket will be phased out with 1271.

Basically you're only buying a few more months of phased in... In other words not that much better off than a 754 buyer (except you spent more)

This MB will be going into a crunching drone within six months. I will be able to upgrade the CPU longer, which is all that matters to me at that point.

And yes, at that time, I will have a whole new system practically. I'm fine with that.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |