- Aug 8, 2004
- 8,622
- 40
- 91
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_970_SC_ACX_Cooler/
About 34% faster @ 1080p, 32% faster @ 1600p. This is comparing to a 770 2GB though.
Sweet, thanks for that. I searched around but kept coming up empty. I might buy one and give my son my 770 to replace his 650 non Ti.
Here's the 970 vs 770 benchmarks-
About a 20fps gain per 970GTX vs. 770 GTX ACX
All the current mid-range cards are good enough for most games at 1080p. You will only miss the new GTX 970 if you need the latest features or 4K support. Better to wait for the Maxwell 3.0 20nm cards, with even better secret sauce.
most games? so what if he plays the games that can be very demanding?All the current mid-range cards are good enough for most games at 1080p. You will only miss the new GTX 970 if you need the latest features or 4K support. Better to wait for the Maxwell 3.0 20nm cards, with even better secret sauce.
Yeah, I'm looking foward in particular to AC:Unity and The Witcher 3 and would like to play them maxed out with PhysX (except for performance intensive AA or something like ubersampling like in the Witcher 2) but the 980 is just too dammed expensive relatively to the 970, I mean what was Nvidia thinking? If it was closer to 450 USD MSRP then the 980 would be a far better value proposition.most games? so what if he plays the games that can be very demanding?
even with a 970 at just 1080 there will be settings that need reduced in some games to stay above 60 fps.
most games? so what if he plays the games that can be very demanding?
even with a 970 at just 1080 there will be settings that need reduced in some games to stay above 60 fps.
One 770 it would be worth it to upgrade, but 2x 770 Sli kill the 980GTX-
My 2x 770 SC ACX sli-
+35fps in TR
Here's Metro LL 980GTX
My 770 SC ACX Sli-
+15fps in Metro LL
I have no reason to upgrade-
just ignore that guy he doesn't even run benchmark at the same settings.