I have the same RAM in my machine right now, I have it running at CL2 and it works very well.
I'm just troubled by the fact that you guys would think Kingston Ram have a remote chance of being 'suck' as some of you put it. Maybe Crucial Rams are more popular in the overclockers sector, but Kingston rams are way more popular in the real sector. In fact, Kingston owns 40% of the overall memory market. If people think that it 'sucks' it will not own 40% of the market. How much does Crucial own?
You can argue that the chips on there is Differnt, but that is the past tense!
I'm not trying to flame someone, the point I'm trying to make is that, KINSTON rams are very well built, and the company itself if very well represented. I just hope I can change someone's impression of Kingston memories with my post.