7th Annual Anandtech Tax Time Thread

Page 17 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,856
4,974
126
Where the hell is my Fed return? I got my state a few days after e-filing. According to the Fed website I'm scheduled to get it March 2nd. ARgghghhhghghhahha
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
Quick question my girlfriend got her W-2 with the wrong name. Can she still file taxes? She's contacted her employer and the payroll department forwarded to their 'people' (ADP) and they sent he an email saying they will not be re-doing W-2's

Thanks guys!

The employer payroll and/or ADP should reissue a corrected W2.
Let her advise the employer and ADP that she will be filing the incorrect W2 and attaching a copy of the email response with her return for the IRS to review.

She will not be able to efile - but, she needs to cover her ass.
And possibly the threat of alerting the IRS may light a fire under the proper people to get the correct W2.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
I filed mine for tax year 2008 last October and they just processed it after complaining to the Taxpayer Advocate Service. It's supposed to be sent in 2 weeks.
 

anonmouseuser

Senior member
Jun 25, 2002
288
0
0
Anyone else's return stuck under reference code 1301? Returned accepted on 02/04 and I was expecting a direct deposit on 02/16. Thanks.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
Anyone else's return stuck under reference code 1301? Returned accepted on 02/04 and I was expecting a direct deposit on 02/16. Thanks.

That was the code I got for months, but doesn't mean much. I read somewhere there were delays in processing first time homebuyer credits and that was the reason for quite a few 1301's.
 

alfa147x

Lifer
Jul 14, 2005
30,061
103
106
The employer payroll and/or ADP should reissue a corrected W2.
Let her advise the employer and ADP that she will be filing the incorrect W2 and attaching a copy of the email response with her return for the IRS to review.

She will not be able to efile - but, she needs to cover her ass.
And possibly the threat of alerting the IRS may light a fire under the proper people to get the correct W2.

Thanks!
 

anonmouseuser

Senior member
Jun 25, 2002
288
0
0
That was the code I got for months, but doesn't mean much. I read somewhere there were delays in processing first time homebuyer credits and that was the reason for quite a few 1301's.

So if I am reading your post correctly, it took months for you to get your refund?
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
If I lived in an apartment that I then had to vacate and throw away most of my possessions, do I need to report the $2000 that I got from renter's insurance as income anywhere? I hope not, cause it only covered part of what I had to toss....

Also, I had to stay at a motel for over a week while they figured out my apartment (my health had deteriorated cause of the mold and couldnt live there). Can I deduct any amount of my total paid for lodging?

Thanks so much!
 
Last edited:

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
If I lived in an apartment that I then had to vacate and throw away most of my possessions, do I need to report the $2000 that I got from renter's insurance as income anywhere? I hope not, cause it only covered part of what I had to toss....

Also, I had to stay at a motel for over a week while they figured out my apartment (my health had deteriorated cause of the mold and couldnt live there). Can I deduct any amount of my total paid for lodging?

Thanks so much!

There is a worksheet for casualty and loss. Chances are $2000 wouldn't be enough....I am curious why in a mold mediation you had to trash everything inside the dwelling.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
If I lived in an apartment that I then had to vacate and throw away most of my possessions, do I need to report the $2000 that I got from renter's insurance as income anywhere? I hope not, cause it only covered part of what I had to toss....

Also, I had to stay at a motel for over a week while they figured out my apartment (my health had deteriorated cause of the mold and couldnt live there). Can I deduct any amount of my total paid for lodging?

Thanks so much!

There is a worksheet for casualty and loss. Chances are $2000 wouldn't be enough....I am curious why in a mold mediation you had to trash everything inside the dwelling.

The casualty & loss will normally require a Schedule A. You have to account for insurance repayments and then also eat 10&#37; of your income as a loss.
IRS FAQ
Top Ten Tips for Taxpayers Deducting Casualty and Theft Losses

IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2009-17

Taxpayers who find themselves the victim of a natural disaster or theft this summer should know the rules for deducting their casualty losses next year when they file their federal tax return. Generally, you may deduct losses to your home, household items and vehicles on your federal income tax return.

Here are ten things the IRS wants you to know about deducting casualty or theft losses.

  • 1. You may not deduct casualty and theft losses covered by insurance unless you file a timely claim for reimbursement. You must reduce your loss by the amount of the reimbursement.
  • 2. A casualty does not include normal wear and tear or progressive deterioration from age or termite damage.
  • 3. The damage must be caused by a sudden, unexpected or unusual event like a car accident, fire, earthquake, flood or vandalism.
  • 4. If your property is not completely destroyed or if it is personal-use property, the amount of your casualty or theft loss is the lesser of the adjusted basis of your property, or the decrease in fair market value of your property as a result of the casualty or theft, reduced by any insurance or other reimbursement you receive or expect to receive.
  • 5. If business or income-producing property, such as rental property, is completely destroyed, the amount of your loss is your adjusted basis in the property minus any salvage value, and minus any insurance or other reimbursement you receive or expect to receive.
  • 6. To claim a casualty or theft loss, you must complete Form 4684, Casualties and Thefts, and attach it to your return. Generally, you may claim casualty or theft loss of personal use property only if you itemize deductions on Form 1040, Schedule A. However, you can deduct a 2008 or 2009 net disaster loss from a federally-declared disaster even if you do not itemize your deductions.
  • 7. If the property was held by you for personal use, you must further reduce your loss by $100. This $100 reduction for losses of personal-use property applies to each casualty or theft event that occurred during the year other than 2009. For 2009, individuals must reduce their casualty and theft losses for personal-use property by $500 instead of $100. This $500 reduction for losses of personal-use property applies to each casualty or theft event.
  • 8. The total of all your casualty and theft losses of personal-use property usually must be further reduced by 10 percent of your adjusted gross income. The 10 percent AGI limitation does not apply to net disaster losses resulting from federally declared disasters in 2008 and 2009.
  • 9. In figuring your loss, do not consider the loss of future profits or income due to the casualty.
  • 10. Casualty losses are normally deductible only in the year the casualty occurred. But if you have a deductible loss from a federally declared disaster you can choose to deduct that loss on your tax return for the previous year. If you have already filed your return for the preceding year, you can claim the loss on the previous year tax return by filing an amended return.

For more information about casualty and theft losses and the special rules for net disaster losses see Publication 547, Casualties, Disasters and Thefts available on the IRS.gov Web site or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
So if I am reading your post correctly, it took months for you to get your refund?

I filed in October for the tax year 2008...my check is finally going to be sent next month.

It took a request for assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate Service a couple weeks ago for them to finally process it.

Since its only been a few weeks for you tho, you probably need to wait a few more before calling them. Mine was probably just an extreme case.
 

jiggahertz

Golden Member
Apr 7, 2005
1,532
0
76
This is a 2010 tax question, but figured this would be the best place to ask. My fiance and I both own condos. We are in the process of selling mine and buying a house before April 30th. If we do this, would we be eligible for the $6500 tax credit? The full amount or 50%. Would it matter if my condo was sold before/after we got married?

You are eligible for the full amount (depending on your income level) if you meet the length of time in the existing place.
If married, the income level increases.
You will have to include her income if married.
The income level will be based on your martial status on 31 Dec

I just ran across a couple of articles of people asking related, but slightly different questions:

http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/faq2.php#20

  1. How can two unmarried buyers allocate the tax credit if one qualifies for the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit and the other qualifies for the $6,500 repeat home buyer credit?
    The buyers can allocate the tax credit in any reasonable manner, provided neither claims a tax credit higher than the one they qualify for and the home purchase does not yield a total of more than $8,000 in tax credits. For example, the repeat home buyer could claim $6,500 and the first-time home buyer could claim $1,500. Alternatively, both buyers could claim a $4,000 tax credit.
  2. Does a married couple qualify for any home buyer tax credit in the following situation? Spouse A has lived in and owned the same principal residence for at least five years. Spouse B has lived in and owned the same principal residence for less than five years.
    In this situation, the couple does not qualify for any home buyer tax credit. Because the couple is married, the law tests the ownership history of both spouses. Spouse A clearly does not qualify for the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit, so neither does Spouse B.

    Spouse A does appear to qualify for the $6,500 repeat buyer credit, but because Spouse B has not owned and lived in the same principal residence for at least five years, neither of them can claim the repeat home buyer tax credit.
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/bus...g/2009/12/who_qualifies_for_the_6500_hom.html
Q. I was married in August 2008. We are buying a new home with a close date of Feb 1st. I qualify for $6,500 as a repeat buyer but my wife has never owned a home. Do we cancel each other out? So we can’t get the $8,000 that she would qualify for and I can’t get the $6,500 that I qualify for? This seems illogical and I would doubt that it was the goal of Congress.
A. The law states that married couples must both meet the qualifications for either version of the credit. Because both versions of the credit have qualifications that you and your wife do not meet (you as a repeat buyer and your wife as a first-time buyer), no credit is available to you at this time.

I think we should be OK on income limits either me by myself or married, but if I understand this correctly it seems to indicate married couples must both qualify for the credit. Because we are not selling her condo, and she hasn't lived in mine for the past 5 years I don't think she would be eligible. And from your reply that married status would be determined as of Dec 31 2010, so even if we got married after we closed on the new house we still couldn't qualify? Do you agree with what is stated in these articles or am I missing something?

Thanks,
JH
 

anonmouseuser

Senior member
Jun 25, 2002
288
0
0
I filed in October for the tax year 2008...my check is finally going to be sent next month.

It took a request for assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate Service a couple weeks ago for them to finally process it.

Since its only been a few weeks for you tho, you probably need to wait a few more before calling them. Mine was probably just an extreme case.

Thanks.
 

KnickNut3

Platinum Member
Oct 1, 2001
2,382
0
0
Could use some help, please.

I left a job in 09, and my Roth 401k was transferred to a Roth IRA when I left the company. The company match went into a Traditional IRA since they said it would otherwise be taxed. The 1099-R form lists it as G distribution, "direct rollover of a distribution (other than a designated Roth account distribution)".

For example, 10,000 was the transfer (box 1), and 8,000 was Roth contributions (box 5). However, TurboTax is labeling the entire 10,000 transfer as an excess Roth distribution with penalties because my income makes me ineligible for Roth contributions.

Is the form wrong? If I enter an H code, "Direct rollover of a designated Roth account distribution to a Roth IRA," no taxable event occurs in TurboTax. I have tried calling the company but they keep telling me they don't provide tax advice (thank God I'm not there anymore!). How should I approach this?

Thank you!
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
AFAIK whatever was transferred from the old account is not counted, but any matching/new funds that exceed the threshold you are allowed could be.

You need to count the original funds as a direct rollover and the other as new contributions. Your company may have just bundled it all into one to save them effort. I'd report it as it actually went in...much like not getting a 1099 you should have.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
.........cost basis ..sale price ..profit(loss)
2009 918.00 ..1,023.06 ...105.06 ..Long term

2010 1,050.00 ..1,060.28 ...10.28 ..Short term

How do you determine the cost basis?
The amount you purchased the items for along with any fees and commissions for purchase and sale.

If you paid $10/share and for 100 shares that cost was $1000.
You may have paid some type of broker fees at purchase and/or selling. Assume that those totaled $25.

So the cost basis of the sale would have been $1025.
 

KnickNut3

Platinum Member
Oct 1, 2001
2,382
0
0
AFAIK whatever was transferred from the old account is not counted, but any matching/new funds that exceed the threshold you are allowed could be.

You need to count the original funds as a direct rollover and the other as new contributions. Your company may have just bundled it all into one to save them effort. I'd report it as it actually went in...much like not getting a 1099 you should have.

Report it as two separate 1099s? What codes should I use, the "direct roth rollover" as it should have been? Won't that cause a problem if my forms don't match what they sent to the IRS? Or should I just do it "right" regardless and just make a best efforts to have them correct it?
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,591
5
0
FYI:
I tried to use TurboTax for a family member.
Unless you pay $15 it WILL NOT import information from last year.
That means all your personal information as well as employer info and 2008 filing info is not available. It all must be reentered. :\

Filing may free, but you have to spend extra time to get re-enter last year's data.

I personally switched from the stand alone TT back in '03 when they pulled the "malware" stunt.
This will now have me switch the family members that were using TT Free for simple filing to another program.
 

Bullhonkie

Golden Member
Sep 28, 2001
1,899
0
76
This should be quite simple. Just wanted to run through it and make sure I'm not missing anything really obvious--numbers are all roughly speaking.

I'm 27, a full-time student pursuing my first degree, and living on my own. I didn't work in 2009.

My only income is from scholarships/grants totaling ~22k. My tuition/fees/required materials paid in 2009 is ~12k, leaving ~10k in taxable scholarship/grant funds. Cannot claim any educational credits because my tuition was paid with non-taxable scholarship/grant money. After standard deduction (single) and personal exemption, remaining taxable income is ~1k and tax owed is ~100.

Does that look right?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
This should be quite simple. Just wanted to run through it and make sure I'm not missing anything really obvious--numbers are all roughly speaking.

I'm 27, a full-time student pursuing my first degree, and living on my own. I didn't work in 2009.

My only income is from scholarships/grants totaling ~22k. My tuition/fees/required materials paid in 2009 is ~12k, leaving ~10k in taxable scholarship/grant funds. Cannot claim any educational credits because my tuition was paid with non-taxable scholarship/grant money. After standard deduction (single) and personal exemption, remaining taxable income is ~1k and tax owed is ~100.

Does that look right?

Sounds about right.
 

newnameman

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,219
0
0
I've got a question about the American Opportunity Credit. I see from the IRS site that it can be claimed for expenses from the "first four years of post-secondary education". So I can take this credit even though my fourth year of post-secondary education is in graduate school, correct? (I completed my undergrad degree in three years).
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
This should be quite simple. Just wanted to run through it and make sure I'm not missing anything really obvious--numbers are all roughly speaking.

I'm 27, a full-time student pursuing my first degree, and living on my own. I didn't work in 2009.

My only income is from scholarships/grants totaling ~22k. My tuition/fees/required materials paid in 2009 is ~12k, leaving ~10k in taxable scholarship/grant funds. Cannot claim any educational credits because my tuition was paid with non-taxable scholarship/grant money. After standard deduction (single) and personal exemption, remaining taxable income is ~1k and tax owed is ~100.

Does that look right?

Looks dead on.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |