indeed it is a SKU that allows overclocking but does nothing to performance. So if 8130P positions against the 2600K on performance. then the 8110 which is positionned against the 2600 need the overclock possibility AND an overclock to compete with the 2600 does that sound right?
Just look at it this way:
Hypothetical FX 8c- 2.8GHz same price as an i7 2600 running 3.4GHz
Hypotetical FX 8c 3.2GHz same price as an i7 2600K running 3.4GHz
So which on competes what?
Is it the second one competing an overclockable i7? but that would mean they do not compete against the normal SKU... or is the first one competing to the normal SKU and make their part more actractive because it is oc-able?
I don't believe a company tries to compete on overclockability but on stock performance. and overclockability being a advantage towards an extremen minority of the public.
So for me the cpu classes are FX vs i5-i7 non-K parts.