I agree... at age 11, you probably haven't even entered puberty yet! And where you come from, people are already screwing at that age?? :disgust:
Originally posted by: Boxxcar
Originally posted by: MithShrike
Most people my age (19) have lost their virginity by the age of 11 and have had more than 6 sexual partners. I am definitely of the minority here.
11 !!!!! Where are you? Africa?
Originally posted by: exdeathActually no, the wedding is set for Feb '06 with my fiancee of 3 years after dating for 3 years before the engagement.
And anything I've ever posted to these boards could just as well come from her fingers
And to buck the modern trend, she won't be 9 months pregnant at the wedding nor after, and in fact we plan to put off kids for at least a year after the wedding just to rub that point home. It flys in the face of everyone I know and they hate the fact that we managed to do everything "the right way." (ie: school first, house first, kids on OUR terms, etc)
Originally posted by: amcdonald
Originally posted by: exdeathActually no, the wedding is set for Feb '06 with my fiancee of 3 years after dating for 3 years before the engagement.
And anything I've ever posted to these boards could just as well come from her fingers
And to buck the modern trend, she won't be 9 months pregnant at the wedding nor after, and in fact we plan to put off kids for at least a year after the wedding just to rub that point home. It flys in the face of everyone I know and they hate the fact that we managed to do everything "the right way." (ie: school first, house first, kids on OUR terms, etc)
Just to let you know, you sound like an uptight christian assburger.
no one gives a crap about your 'right way' of doing things.
Is your fiance not going to be pregnant because you haven't had sex?
Originally posted by: MBrown
You shouldnt get girls just to have sex with them...
Originally posted by: TGS
Still the trend exists. A man who sleeps with many partners is a stud. While women who sleep with many partners is a whore.
Get over yourself, mister yeah I'd hit it, but she's still the whore. When people, especially other men will realize that by doing the same actions you are just a man-whore. Though for some reason our society respects the man-whore idea. Who are these guys having flings with? Other men?! Last time I checked if a man is having sex with a women, it also requires a women to be present. Thus when a women is participating in "whore-like" activities, there IS A MAN ON THE OTHER END.
Cripes on a stick guys. Wheres the vilification of the men that participate in the activities women are getting labelled with?
For point of reference, my wife at the time we were dating told me that she had more partners. The point really isn't the numbers but the reality that no man is going to go out into the "Real world" and find some 18 year old virgin that he can swoop down and marry. Reality suggests you will find someone with prior intimate experience. If the number of prior experiences scares you, than walk away because you probably aren't ready to handle the fact people have had intimate relationships long before you even thought about them.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: alkemyst
However, in these sort of things people tend to project their own lives onto the debate and since 'they have' only been with 3-4 people, they want to feel that is normal. Then they say things like 'I turned down at least a dozen or so+' (I can't remember all the chicks I have been with, yet alone who I turned down and turned me down).
Fact of the matter is if one was so virtuous as they claimed when it came to lack of nooky, they probably wouldn't be here.
I disagree, take me for instance. In the last 8 years I've only had sex with one person. That's because I'm able to hold a relationship, and I've been with the same girl for 8 years. In that time, I've had as much nooky as I wanted.
Does that make me a prude? Was I supposed to dump someone I liked just so I can go whoring around and increase my "count"?
Having sex with the same person 500 times is much less sleazy than having 500 one-night stands with random people or 100 short-term relationships.
Originally posted by: amcdonald
I'd be more concerned with him being 25 and her being 19.
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: TGS
Still the trend exists. A man who sleeps with many partners is a stud. While women who sleep with many partners is a whore.
Get over yourself, mister yeah I'd hit it, but she's still the whore. When people, especially other men will realize that by doing the same actions you are just a man-whore. Though for some reason our society respects the man-whore idea. Who are these guys having flings with? Other men?! Last time I checked if a man is having sex with a women, it also requires a women to be present. Thus when a women is participating in "whore-like" activities, there IS A MAN ON THE OTHER END.
Cripes on a stick guys. Wheres the vilification of the men that participate in the activities women are getting labelled with?
For point of reference, my wife at the time we were dating told me that she had more partners. The point really isn't the numbers but the reality that no man is going to go out into the "Real world" and find some 18 year old virgin that he can swoop down and marry. Reality suggests you will find someone with prior intimate experience. If the number of prior experiences scares you, than walk away because you probably aren't ready to handle the fact people have had intimate relationships long before you even thought about them.
Heh see my post a few back regarding equal treatment of both sexes in the breeding pools.
Guy or girl matters not in my view. It's the focus on sex sex sex sex sex sex sex football beer sex sex sex sex TV sex sex sex in our society that annoys me. I'm not saying you shouldn't do it at all, but damn, there is more to life than 24/7 beer and sex. And on college campuses, I find chit chat amongst my own age group, about nothing but "banging chicks", absolutely repulsive. For starters shave and get a fvcking hair cut.
The size -2 stick bit*h fad is finally going out of style. I don't know about anyone else here but I prefer a woman with meat and some body, someone that can handle a .45 as well as I can, not just a skeleton with fake tits. You know, someone that you CAN have sex with without breaking them like a barbie doll.
Originally posted by: BlueWeasel
Originally posted by: ElFenix
you're violating half + 7
You sure?
25/2 = 12.5 + 7 = 19.5 years old
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: TGS
Still the trend exists. A man who sleeps with many partners is a stud. While women who sleep with many partners is a whore.
Get over yourself, mister yeah I'd hit it, but she's still the whore. When people, especially other men will realize that by doing the same actions you are just a man-whore. Though for some reason our society respects the man-whore idea. Who are these guys having flings with? Other men?! Last time I checked if a man is having sex with a women, it also requires a women to be present. Thus when a women is participating in "whore-like" activities, there IS A MAN ON THE OTHER END.
Cripes on a stick guys. Wheres the vilification of the men that participate in the activities women are getting labelled with?
For point of reference, my wife at the time we were dating told me that she had more partners. The point really isn't the numbers but the reality that no man is going to go out into the "Real world" and find some 18 year old virgin that he can swoop down and marry. Reality suggests you will find someone with prior intimate experience. If the number of prior experiences scares you, than walk away because you probably aren't ready to handle the fact people have had intimate relationships long before you even thought about them.
Heh see my post a few back regarding equal treatment of both sexes in the breeding pools.
Guy or girl matters not in my view. It's the focus on sex sex sex sex sex sex sex football beer sex sex sex sex TV sex sex sex in our society that annoys me. I'm not saying you shouldn't do it at all, but damn, there is more to life than 24/7 beer and sex. And on college campuses, I find chit chat amongst my own age group, about nothing but "banging chicks", absolutely repulsive. For starters shave and get a fvcking hair cut.
The size -2 stick bit*h fad is finally going out of style. I don't know about anyone else here but I prefer a woman with meat and some body, someone that can handle a .45 as well as I can, not just a skeleton with fake tits. You know, someone that you CAN have sex with without breaking them like a barbie doll.
Originally posted by: TGS
Still the trend exists. A man who sleeps with many partners is a stud. While women who sleep with many partners is a whore.
Get over yourself, mister yeah I'd hit it, but she's still the whore. When people, especially other men will realize that by doing the same actions you are just a man-whore. Though for some reason our society respects the man-whore idea. Who are these guys having flings with? Other men?! Last time I checked if a man is having sex with a women, it also requires a women to be present. Thus when a women is participating in "whore-like" activities, there IS A MAN ON THE OTHER END.
Cripes on a stick guys. Wheres the vilification of the men that participate in the activities women are getting labelled with?
For point of reference, my wife at the time we were dating told me that she had more partners. The point really isn't the numbers but the reality that no man is going to go out into the "Real world" and find some 18 year old virgin that he can swoop down and marry. Reality suggests you will find someone with prior intimate experience. If the number of prior experiences scares you, than walk away because you probably aren't ready to handle the fact people have had intimate relationships long before you even thought about them.
Originally posted by: livinlovin
Where I come from guys who sleep around are called dirtbags, not studs.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Tell us this how old were you when you started dating this chick of 8 years.
I am willing to bet (although it's possible it will last) that this is more phone time than poon time.
If you found someone that makes you happy it make no sense to look on.
Originally posted by: GrantMeThePower
If you started dating a chick and she told you (after a bunch of dates) that she'd been with 8 dudes (and she's only 19 years old) what would you do?
but I've turned down at least another 6 or 7, most of whom were really smokin', but I said no because I want to keep it as a special thing. (no comments on the stupidity/lamness of that. q]
I think your the woman here.