80 - 1 and Counting

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,568
9,939
146
More than 80 editorial boards have formally endorsed Hillary Clinton for President of the United States. Only one has endorsed Donald Trump. One.

These are the voices of newspapers from communities across America, large and small, conservative and liberal, traditionally Republican and traditionally Democratic, and they speak with one united voice in a manner unprecedented in the history of our country.

The stakes are high. Below find some reasons they ALL think the only sane and logical and, indeed, patriotic choice in this election is Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Read, listen, absorb or not absorb. It's your choice. To me, and to them, representatives of towns and cities and regions from every part of our land, the choice is beyond clear, even from those papers who have NEVER endorsed a Democrat in their entire history!

Idaho Statesman: "Two people with strong, urban New York ties wouldn’t seem to bode well for understanding the needs of rural America. But during Clinton’s days in Arkansas, she developed a sensitivity and empathy for small towns and those living agrarian lifestyles. She reinvented herself and, more importantly, educated herself about the issues rural economies and workers face, and in doing so she is better prepared to understand many issues at the heart of our state."

San Diego Union-Tribune: "This paper has not endorsed a Democrat for president in its 148-year history. But we endorse Clinton. She's the safe choice for the US and for the world, for Democrats and Republicans alike."

Chicago Sun-Times: "Allow us, as well, a special shout-out to those who understand what a danger Trump represents but are cool to Clinton: A vote for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, a man who could not even pass a basic world geography test, is not a principled protest gesture. It is a retreat to the sidelines."


The Dallas Morning News: "We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections."

The Cincinnati Enquirer: "The Enquirer has supported Republicans for president for almost a century ... But this is not a traditional race, and these are not traditional times. ... We need a leader who will bring out the best in all Americans, not the worst."

New York Daily News: "Heaven help America were, unthinkably, Clinton to fail. She is all that stands between the United States of America and never-before-seen proof that the Founding Fathers weren't all that they've been cracked up to be."

Corpus Christi Caller-Times: "She is not, as has been sold, a mere lesser of two evils. Her experience and intellect would make her a standout in any group of candidates."

Akron Beacon Journal: "Hillary Clinton is the change. ... She knows her way around the partisan battles. The country doesn't need a revolution. It isn't a wreck. It requires the right brand of change."

Sun Sentinel: "Hillary's toughness and clear-headedness are reasons some of America's adversaries – Vladimir Putin, to name one – seem so eager to see Donald Trump in the White House. Hillary will look Putin in the eye and not blink."

The Tampa Bay Times: "Hillary Clinton is the only candidate for president with the values, experience and knowledge to meet the challenges at home and abroad."

Seattle Times: "Clinton brings a superior understanding of America’s challenges, opportunities and its role in building prosperity and stability around the world."

Bangor Daily News: "The choice is between voting for someone committed to a life of public service who has the experience, the intelligence and the temperament to lead the nation versus someone who is committed only to himself, who lies constantly and who regularly displays a lack of self-control."

News & Observer in Raleigh: "Let’s stop pretending Donald Trump is a reasonable choice in this presidential election. ... As a candidate, Clinton will not win by dividing and offering hollow promises of huge tax cuts and restoring some mythical former America. She will win on knowledge, competence and grit."

Niagara Gazette: "In this year’s presidential race, only one candidate has any idea what it means to serve something greater than self or the proven ability to do so, and that candidate is Hillary Clinton. ... She is smart, diplomatic, poised and worldly. She has a clear-eyed take on the universe and her place in it. She is an adult."

Los Angeles Times: "Perhaps her greatest strength is her pragmatism — her ability to build consensus and solve problems. As president, she would be flexible enough and experienced enough to cut across party lines and work productively with her political opponents."

The Arizona Republic: "This year is different. The 2016 Republican candidate is not conservative and he is not qualified. That's why, for the first time in our history, The Arizona Republic will support a Democrat for president.
 
Reactions: Number1

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
OP shows clear signs of bias! Only offering one side of the story! Where is the Trump support that you promised! I demand only equal treatment of both candidates' support!
 

sontakke

Senior member
Aug 8, 2001
895
11
81
Yes, he never listed the one supporting Trump; he is obviously biased. I am not going to put any emoji because if you need emoji to figure out sarcasm, you need to stay away from internet.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Too bad that the endorsement from the Santa Barbara News-Press is behind a paywall. I'll bet it's good for a few laughs.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,286
6,352
126
Shit, even the editorial poles are fixed. I wonder how many of those papers have been out of business for years or are owned by illegal aliens.
 
Reactions: JEDIYoda

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
My dad is surrounded by Trump bots in his neighborhood down in Jax. I think he would love to put one of those in his front yard.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
38,409
8,703
136
Proof of media conspiracy. We are lost... flee!

JK Actually, I'm really glad it's this lopsided. If it were only 70/30 the atmosphere would be wretched. The political atmosphere in this country is bad enough as it is.
 
Last edited:

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,697
8,096
136
My only wish is that the traitorous scumfucks who actually vote for Strongman Trump would get branded as the traitorous scumfucks that they are so they can be publicly shamed for the rest of their disgusting lives.

Oh well.
 

Painman

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
3,728
29
86
My only wish is that the traitorous scumfucks who actually vote for Strongman Trump would get branded as the traitorous scumfucks that they are so they can be publicly shamed for the rest of their disgusting lives.

Oh well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHCvK9pG4Zc

Fuck it, I'm not going to try to embed with this forum's weirdness

Just click on the fucking thing, and realize that when Zappa is talking about Nazis, He's talking about YOU.

Seriously. Permanent badges of shame for people who politically disagree with you? Who the fucking hell do you think you are? What do you think your "movement" is, when it's led by a corporatist, neo-neocon, stinking sack of warmongering pigshit who regards you as useful idiots?

Where the fuck is your personal pride?
 
Reactions: PokerGuy

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,242
86
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHCvK9pG4Zc

Fuck it, I'm not going to try to embed with this forum's weirdness

Just click on the fucking thing, and realize that when Zappa is talking about Nazis, He's talking about YOU.

Seriously. Permanent badges of shame for people who politically disagree with you? Who the fucking hell do you think you are? What do you think your "movement" is, when it's led by a corporatist, neo-neocon, stinking sack of warmongering pigshit who regards you as useful idiots?

Where the fuck is your personal pride?

It's about time someone stood up for the people who were against desegregation.
 

Painman

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
3,728
29
86
It's about time someone stood up for the people who were against desegregation.

I dunno what the hell happened to Red Dawn, but I'm going to ape his advice:

1) Grab your lower lip

2) Pull it up over your face

3) Swallow
 
Reactions: Ophir

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,222
136
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHCvK9pG4Zc

Fuck it, I'm not going to try to embed with this forum's weirdness

Just click on the fucking thing, and realize that when Zappa is talking about Nazis, He's talking about YOU.

Seriously. Permanent badges of shame for people who politically disagree with you? Who the fucking hell do you think you are? What do you think your "movement" is, when it's led by a corporatist, neo-neocon, stinking sack of warmongering pigshit who regards you as useful idiots?

Where the fuck is your personal pride?

Isn't that cute? The poorly educated, low information and low class cuck learned a new word and couldn't wait to spray it all over. How droll.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
An excellent illustration of how the media in this country has gone to complete crap. The only sane thing to do would be to not endorse either of the candidates. Endorsing the scumbag over the jackass just shows how worthless they've become.

It also shows just how terrified the established politicos and are of Trump, which is definitely an indicator that he's doing something right. If he wasn't such a thundering jackass, it would be easy to support him.
 
Reactions: AnonymouseUser

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Not seeing the logic of that at all.

Sometimes if everyone is saying that someone is totally unsuitable for a job it just means that they are totally unsuitable for a job.

True, but that's not what's going on here. "everyone" in this case is actually "everyone part of the political establishment and media". If they all agree someone is wonderful, that's a good reason to think that person is terrible. If they all agree someone is terrible, then it is at least good enough reason to take a good look at that candidate as a good possible option.

It's like when all the entertainment celebs/actors etc and their worthless pals think someone is great, then you know they're crap.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
An excellent illustration of how the media in this country has gone to complete crap. The only sane thing to do would be to not endorse either of the candidates. Endorsing the scumbag over the jackass just shows how worthless they've become.

It also shows just how terrified the established politicos and are of Trump, which is definitely an indicator that he's doing something right. If he wasn't such a thundering jackass, it would be easy to support him.

I don't think endorsements matter that much. It's to be expected that some of the typical players will endorse no matter what.

I also respectfully disagree with your premise that "if established politicos are terrified of Trump then he's doing something right." While that may be true in some aspects, especially the self-serving ones (e.g. worried about getting jobs in the admin or loss of influence) there's plenty of stuff to be concerned about with Trump for everyone and not just established politicos. And although they'll reflexively cry "false equivalency" like a bunch of sheep, there's definitely concerns for the not "established politicos" from a Clinton administration as well although she doesn't threaten the political class self-interests the same way. The only thing that's reasonably certain is that there is a huge reserve of unhappiness in the electorate that's being expressed in populist rhetoric and candidates and the policies of neither major party are doing a damn thing to address it. Indeed one side in particular is doing a great job to fan those flames of discontentment by telling folks how their party is so great for them and not to vote against their own "self-interests." As if someone posting 20 times a day on an ATPN message board to be a fluffer for a particular candidate (see OP) has the slightest fvcking clue what the self-interests of a typical Trump voter is. Or a third party candidate voter.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,443
9,343
136
True, but that's not what's going on here. "everyone" in this case is actually "everyone part of the political establishment and media". If they all agree someone is wonderful, that's a good reason to think that person is terrible. If they all agree someone is terrible, then it is at least good enough reason to take a good look at that candidate as a good possible option.

Again I'm not seeing the logic at all.

If you needed serious surgery and Bob down the pub said he'd do it with a carpet cutter you'd be OK with that if every medical professional said that Bob was a really bad choice?
 
Reactions: KMFJD and Perknose

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,568
9,939
146
As if someone posting 20 times a day on an ATPN message board...

Talk about Trumpian levels of lack of self-awareness! Someone is in desperate need of Moonie's mirror.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,286
9,114
136
My only wish is that the traitorous scumfucks who actually vote for Strongman Trump would get branded as the traitorous scumfucks that they are so they can be publicly shamed for the rest of their disgusting lives.

Oh well.

The "Orange T".
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Talk about Trumpian levels of lack of self-awareness! Someone is in desperate need of Moonie's mirror.

If it's any consolation I'm sure your efforts have influenced some folks who were considering whether to vote 3rd party or for Clinton to move decisively to the 3rd party camp now. You've probably lost more votes for Clinton than you've gained for her.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |