Dx12 is going to get rid of the driver thread(driver/api overhead) ,games today have 4 threads MAXIMUM (threads that get high % so are essential for speed, caused by ps4 hardware the main threads run on one of the two cpus so 4 threads max) vga thread included,so dx12 is going to make slow quads even more redundant than they already are because there will be even less threads to run and dual cores will become even faster for the same reason.But DX12 is going to make those 4 module FX chips age surprisingly well..even though they are currently dead-ish.
games today have 4 threads MAXIMUM
so dx12 is going to make slow quads even more redundant than they already are because there will be even less threads to run and dual cores will become even faster for the same reason.
Dx12 is going to get rid of the driver thread(driver/api overhead) ,games today have 4 threads MAXIMUM (threads that get high % so are essential for speed, caused by ps4 hardware the main threads run on one of the two cpus so 4 threads max) vga thread included,so dx12 is going to make slow quads even more redundant than they already are because there will be even less threads to run and dual cores will become even faster for the same reason.
Games today have more than 4 threads.
The disappearing driver thread's % will go straight to the working threads on a dual because it runs on the same core as those threadsSimple no.
okan since you already have a mobo for the FX, just go for the 6300
Not worth spending money on a new board + processor
Can't understand the reasoning behind recommending a Pentium when he already got a board that can take the FX.
okan since you already have a mobo for the FX, just go for the 6300
Not worth spending money on a new board + processor
Can't understand the reasoning behind recommending a Pentium when he already got a board that can take the FX.
Again with thief? The in-build benchmark may use more threads but inside the game you get only 1 thread (and another 2-3 threads that spike up a bit whenever needed)
FX-6300 is probably not much faster than the G3258 in GTA5, though.
I picked the G3258 because it is socket 1150, and a much faster CPU can be put in down the road, so more future proof, I think.
GTA V at minimum recommends a Quad-Core CPU -
This reviewer couldn't get his G3258 to even run the game at all -
http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/1911-gta-v-cpu-benchmark-4790k-3570k-9590-more
For GTA V, i'm pretty sure the FX-6300 would slap that Pentium around, but for future expansion, obviously the 1150 socket is where it's at.
On another note. My 3570K bottlenecks my GTX 780 @ 1440p in this game. My CPU usage is usually around 90-100% on all cores... game is a killer.
I repeat, he is using a GTX460 768mb video card.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-460/specifications
Doesn't change the fact that a FX 6300 would still offer better performance in GTA V over the Pentium, especially at lower resolutions, which he will have to play in because of his older VC (Which pretty much meets or beats the minimum system requirements)
I'm confident that there will be no noticeable difference.
Since he has already decided to go with the dead end FX-6300, I don't care anymore. :biggrin:
3. fx 6300 (maybe i don't need motherboard, i have ga-870-usb3l, not listed but i found someone who use. Than its cheaper for my.)
I need good workstation.
GA-870-usb3l doesn't support FX-6300 and other Visheras, only certain Bulldozers:
http://www.gigabyte.com/support-downloads/cpu-support-popup.aspx?pid=3801
With the G3258, he can put an i7-4790 in it 2 years down the road, and get a huge performance boost.
His vid card is pretty weak, so there's not much worry about gaming bottlenecks. That was my reasoning.
With the G3258, he can put an i7-4790 in it 2 years down the road, and get a huge performance boost.
In 2 years there will be several options and better ones from Intel and who knows even Zen. Plus it will be nice to have DDR4
Is this a graphics engine benchmark just like aten's thief benchmark?4 threads max? Are you kidding me? How many times to you need to be proven wrong on this subject before you give it a rest?
You do see those threads even in the video.Completely wrong, Thief uses more than one thread. You will have to use a second Monitor and play the game in full screen to register all the threads.
Is this a graphics engine benchmark just like aten's thief benchmark?
Show us the threads.
You do see those threads even in the video.
Exactly what I said "threads that get high % so are essential for speed"
You get one thread of 22,99% out of 25% which is the maximum for your quad,that is where all your speed comes from,the faster this thread goes the faster the game runs.
The dual only gets around 30-35% out of 50% (60-70 out of 100%) because it needs to run the other stuff,but how much faster is the core of a g3258?
Even if the main thread only runs at 25% on the g3258 because it runs 4 major threads it will still be faster than amd quads.
GA-870-usb3l doesn't support FX-6300 and other Visheras, only certain Bulldozers:
http://www.gigabyte.com/support-downloads/cpu-support-popup.aspx?pid=3801
Yes, but ga-870a-usb3 support. Someone who use with fx 8350 send me a bios software ( it is modified from usb3 bios, same motherboard with little different)
And guys,
fx 6300 is very cheap among others ( about 75$). Why throw extra 60-70$ , and upgrade idea's probability too little.
I can drink something with this 60-70$ , like beer, rakı :biggrin: