Originally posted by: noto12ious
Canun, you've dodged a mountain of evidence indicating controlled demolition at WTC1, WTC2, and especially WTC7
What mountain of evidence? No structural engineer has said it was not possible for the planes to do it. The only thing on here that you call "proof" is the opinions of people doing the best to stay alive. BTW, I seem to recall seeing a fireman on the screen that day stating that #7 had to come down due to the hazard for firemen on the scene. That is a fuzzy recollection, so that isn't proof.
If it sounds like a controlled demolition (numerous huge explosion detonations preceeded all 3 building collapses).. If it looks like a controlled demolition (as indicated by news reporters, fire fighters, demolitions experts...along with obvious demolition squibs 50 floors below any collapse point)...and if eyewitness accounts are also consistent with controlled demolition (numerous corroborating eyewitness testimony to lower level demolition flashes seconds before collapses initiated at the top)...
Numerous huge explosions? Other than when the plane hit, where are they on the films? The plumes I already explained which have at least equal validity to your claim. Applying a logic test such as Occam's Razor puts forth this question? Which is more probable? The planes caused the collapse, or the gov't spent weeks preparing the building for demolition?
If pyroclastic dust clouds are consistent with a controled demolition (including WTC 7)... then I guess it really was a result of controlled demolition Why haven't any of these thoroughly documented pre collapse explosions been officially recognized by the government? Don't forget national hero William Rodriguez's testimony of explosions in the basement levels before the planes struck... explosions which injured many people on the basement levels. Why have ALL of these explosions been ignored by the government of the United States of America? Well?
Did you ever think the witnesses may be wrong? As another poster interjects, there was no seismic signs of pre collapse explosions, and the equipment used to detect earthquakes would notice something like that.
Then again, you can go ahead and believe the official "theory", that for the first time in the history of the world, three steel framed buildings were brought down by fires on the same exact day...and hasn't been repeated since. The official report (which again, ignores every single major pre collapse explosion...I do enjoy pointing that out) basically says that demolition crews across the world are idiots! Why are these demolition crews across the world wasting so much time and money planting explosives throughout many floors to take down buildings, when instead they could just light a few blowtorches, plant a few explosives in the upper floors and watch buildings crumble like on 9/11?
You really are clueless. Do you know how much prep work has to be done to get a precise implosion? You have to gut the beams, place the charges at angles to cut the beams precisely. (which there was no evidence of) Additonally, a large enough impromptu explosion to take out all the central beams would have blown out the garage and the first floor of the buildings, which would have been very noticable, which there weren't. You never took physics, or structural analysis did you? I have, and what you are saying is completely improbably.
Damn, demolition crews sure are clueless! I especially enjoy pointing out WTC7. Perfectly symmetrical collapse with inward kinks where the central columns are, pre collapse explosions caught on camera, demolition flashes while the building is going down, pyroclastic dust clouds, and squibs to boot
Oh yeah, then there's the whole federal offense of criminally removing debris from the crime scene. Why bother investigating? Haha.
Yup, searching for survivors is a problem. You're right they were criminally negligent. Geez.
No wonder the administration strongly opposed the formation of an investigative Comission (which conveniently omitted WTC7).
And to think, controlled demolition at WTC is only a small piece of the overal 9/11 picture =)
And aliens were at Roswell, and we should all drink the cool aid why we can. You still haven't explained how this is the logical conclusion to come to. Additionally, you still haven't stated what expertise you have with buildings, demolitions, structures, etc.
<3 people in denial. You always put a smile on my face. Hey Acanthus, where's your government report?
Do you think for yourself? You are quoting conspiracy theorists, then exagerate your claims. You state that all demolition experts state it was a controlled implosion, which is not the case. You state that the "plumes" are charges, when there is an equally logical explanation that make more sense.