9/11 consipracy movie

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
this is irrefutible proof? it's OPINION.

"IF it is atomized and IF it happened to go down specific elevator shafts" you call that indisputible evidence?

all i see is speculation and evidence that it would have taken a Series of events all of which hinge on IF's to take place in order to have what we saw happen happen.
You seem to scoff at reasonable interpretations of facts and evidence just so you can hold onto your theory like a 2 year olds blanky...
 

Votingisanillusion

Senior member
Nov 6, 2004
626
0
0
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Nik
Why the hell does this have to keep coming up? Isn't it the same OP that keeps posting this damn bullshit?

:| What a giant insult to those and the families of those who've died in the tragic attack. :|

Lock and ban.

WRONG, protesting the war is NOT a knock on veterans and NOT accepting the media report of what happened in the Twin Towers is NOT a knock on the families.

I'm not talking about the war. It's already been determined beyond a shadow of a doubt that conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks are totally bogus and that the attack happened just how the general public believes it did.

Drumming this ****** up over and over is nothing more than insulting now.

You are very unamerican. You speak like a Chinese communist dictator, or a Soviet dictator: those who do not agree with you do not deserve free speech!
I shall add that you do not care about the facts when you dare speaking in the name of the victims' families: not only is it gross, not only doing so you are falling at the lowest levels of bad rethoric, but above all you are misrepresenting those families!!! Many families say that the 9/11 commission report is a cover-up!!!
I suggest you STFU and research what those families have to say, in the hope that you stop insulting those families.

I also suggest that you watch this new documentary, 911 Eyewitness, which includes footage in which you can see and hear four bombs exploding in the WTC:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=eyewitness
Then come back and dare tell me that what you saw and heard did not happen!

I recommend you also watch Loose Change 2nd Edition; it includes a lot more testimonies and documents about the bombs inside the WTC (included are many testimonies and radio recordings of the firefighters inside the WTC reporting bombs exploding at different floors, and the fire being very limited, and about to be under control), and got rid of dubious theories based on low quality videos (missile under the WTC planes theory):
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Nik
Why the hell does this have to keep coming up? Isn't it the same OP that keeps posting this damn bullshit?

:| What a giant insult to those and the families of those who've died in the tragic attack. :|

Lock and ban.

WRONG, protesting the war is NOT a knock on veterans and NOT accepting the media report of what happened in the Twin Towers is NOT a knock on the families.

I'm not talking about the war. It's already been determined beyond a shadow of a doubt that conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks are totally bogus and that the attack happened just how the general public believes it did.

Drumming this ****** up over and over is nothing more than insulting now.

You are very unamerican. You speak like a Chinese communist dictator, or a Soviet dictator: those who do not agree with you do not deserve free speech!
I shall add that you do not care about the facts when you dare speaking in the name of the victims' families: not only is it gross, not only doing so you are falling at the lowest levels of bad rethoric, but above all you are misrepresenting those families!!! Many families say that the 9/11 commission report is a cover-up!!!
I suggest you STFU and research what those families have to say, in the hope that you stop insulting those families.

I also suggest that you watch this new documentary, 911 Eyewitness, which includes footage in which you can see and hear four bombs exploding in the WTC:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=eyewitness
Then come back and dare tell me that what you saw and heard did not happen!

I recommend you also watch Loose Change 2nd Edition; it includes a lot more testimonies and documents about the bombs inside the WTC (included are many testimonies and radio recordings of the firefighters inside the WTC reporting bombs exploding at different floors, and the fire being very limited, and about to be under control), and got rid of dubious theories based on low quality videos (missile under the WTC planes theory):
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

Text
 

DAGTA

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,172
1
0
Originally posted by: Nik
Why the hell does this have to keep coming up? Isn't it the same OP that keeps posting this damn bullshit?

:| What a giant insult to those and the families of those who've died in the tragic attack. :|

Lock and ban.

Insult? If I'm killed somehow, it's not insulting if some people continue to try and find out what happened because they don't accept the 'official' version.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
this is irrefutible proof? it's OPINION.

"IF it is atomized and IF it happened to go down specific elevator shafts" you call that indisputible evidence?

all i see is speculation and evidence that it would have taken a Series of events all of which hinge on IF's to take place in order to have what we saw happen happen.
You seem to scoff at reasonable interpretations of facts and evidence just so you can hold onto your theory like a 2 year olds blanky...

IF it were an INTERPRETATION of fact i would have posted something differently, as it was, it wasn't an INTERPRETATION of fact it was CONJECTURE pure and simple.

 

Votingisanillusion

Senior member
Nov 6, 2004
626
0
0
Nik, your reply proves how you do not care at all about the victims' families but only used them as a pretext to bahave like a little fascist pretending to have the superior moral authority necessary to ban those who dare criticize the 9/11 Bush commission report.
Even if I tell you that some families sued Bush for 9/11 you will not care. Most families had to sign a magic clause to obtain money from the victims fund after 9/11: they had to give up their right to sue Bush and his administration about 9/11. Money to be less free and to STFU: of course neither Bush nor anyone else behind him is guilty of anything of what happened on 9/11, that is why they forced those families to sign that clause.
 

Night Blade

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
439
0
0
I think the truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, can you honestly say the government never covers up anything at all? Truth is there's some very rich bastards out there who profited tremendously from 9/11 & continue to do so, not to say 9/11 was done on purpose but could this happen? Could someone plan something this elaborate? For a couple billion I can't see why not.

But, where's the real proof? footage from the Pentagon, or just 1 of those flight recorders would put all these conspricay theories to rest.
 

BrokenVisage

Lifer
Jan 29, 2005
24,771
14
81
Originally posted by: Night Blade
I think the truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, can you honestly say the government never covers up anything at all? Truth is there's some very rich bastards out there who profited tremendously from 9/11 & continue to do so, not to say 9/11 was done on purpose but could this happen? Could someone plan something this elaborate? For a couple billion I can't see why not.

But, where's the real proof? footage from the Pentagon, or just 1 of those flight recorders would put all these conspricay theories to rest.

Finally, wisdom from an original ATOT'er.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Night Blade
I think the truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, can you honestly say the government never covers up anything at all? Truth is there's some very rich bastards out there who profited tremendously from 9/11 & continue to do so, not to say 9/11 was done on purpose but could this happen? Could someone plan something this elaborate? For a couple billion I can't see why not.

But, where's the real proof? footage from the Pentagon, or just 1 of those flight recorders would put all these conspricay theories to rest.

i'm not saying all the conspiracy theories are right. it was just driving me nuts the extremity of the Anti Conspiracists in this thread, so i was playing devils advocate. probably my stand is pretty close to what you posted.

but you have to admit the anti conspiracists came on pretty strong.

again, i think there are a lot of inconsistencies in the govt explanation. and it seems like it is in their power to put those to rest if they wanted to. however they aren't hence the rise of more conspiracy theories.

 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,877
12,149
136
watching the initial video footage - those videos have so little focus on the planes when they hit the WTC that it's impossible to make a sure statement about the status of the aircraft bodies, IMO.
 

BrokenVisage

Lifer
Jan 29, 2005
24,771
14
81
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Night Blade
I think the truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, can you honestly say the government never covers up anything at all? Truth is there's some very rich bastards out there who profited tremendously from 9/11 & continue to do so, not to say 9/11 was done on purpose but could this happen? Could someone plan something this elaborate? For a couple billion I can't see why not.

But, where's the real proof? footage from the Pentagon, or just 1 of those flight recorders would put all these conspricay theories to rest.

i'm not saying all the conspiracy theories are right. it was just driving me nuts the extremity of the Anti Conspiracists in this thread, so i was playing devils advocate. probably my stand is pretty close to what you posted.

but you have to admit the anti conspiracists came on pretty strong.

again, i think there are a lot of inconsistencies in the govt explanation. and it seems like it is in their power to put those to rest if they wanted to. however they aren't hence the rise of more conspiracy theories.
It's funny that over the years more people have begun to accept the govenment playing a role in the JFK assassination. The JFK movie only exemplified it, it wasn't the main cause. But maybe as time goes by and we get futher away from the incident more people will be open minded about it like they were with JFK. I'm in the same boat as you guys and like to take this stance just to balance the pig-headedness on here, but by no means am I in totally agreement with the theorists, I just like the points they make.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Night Blade
I think the truth lies somewhere in between these extremes, can you honestly say the government never covers up anything at all? Truth is there's some very rich bastards out there who profited tremendously from 9/11 & continue to do so, not to say 9/11 was done on purpose but could this happen? Could someone plan something this elaborate? For a couple billion I can't see why not.

But, where's the real proof? footage from the Pentagon, or just 1 of those flight recorders would put all these conspricay theories to rest.

i'm not saying all the conspiracy theories are right. it was just driving me nuts the extremity of the Anti Conspiracists in this thread, so i was playing devils advocate. probably my stand is pretty close to what you posted.

but you have to admit the anti conspiracists came on pretty strong.

again, i think there are a lot of inconsistencies in the govt explanation. and it seems like it is in their power to put those to rest if they wanted to. however they aren't hence the rise of more conspiracy theories.
It's funny that over the years more people have begun to accept the govenment playing a role in the JFK assassination. The JFK movie only exemplified it, it wasn't the main cause. But maybe as time goes by and we get futher away from the incident more people will be open minded about it like they were with JFK. I'm in the same boat as you guys and like to take this stance just to balance the pig-headedness on here, but by no means am I in totally agreement with the theorists, I just like the points they make.

what really amazes me is when those that only want to accept the govt version of the truth try to imply that anyone that doesn't believe it exactly as they do is being somehow unpatriotic.

that really drives me crazy.
 

Votingisanillusion

Senior member
Nov 6, 2004
626
0
0
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
watching the initial video footage - those videos have so little focus on the planes when they hit the WTC that it's impossible to make a sure statement about the status of the aircraft bodies, IMO.

I totally agree and the authors as well! That is one of the reasons they released the 2nd Edition of Loose Change very recently:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
It also includes a lot of very interesting new material.
 

SampSon

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
7,160
1
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
9/11: Debunking The Myths

Popular Mechanics March 05'
I don't see why people would try and say two commuter planes didn't hit the towers, that is pretty cut and dry.

What you will never sell me on is a huge plane hitting the pentagon and only doing the damage it did.

The security video, while short and vague, would show more than a split second flash if a 155ft plane was flying past it. Also no one in washington noticed a huge jetliner flying incredibly low towards the pentagon?
The way it crashed into the pentagon it would have to been flying very low for sometime in order to impact the way it did.

/tinfoil
 

RCN

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2005
2,134
0
0
I'm not big on conspiracy theories and for the record I'm republican. I am convinced of two things though. There is more to the story of the Pentagon and flight 93 was shot down. Interestingly enough this video suggest a good plane for the job. A Falcon 20.
 

vital

Platinum Member
Sep 28, 2000
2,534
1
81
I believe 9/11 was done by terrorist attacks and not a conspiracy by the US government.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
9/11: Debunking The Myths

Popular Mechanics March 05'
I don't see why people would try and say two commuter planes didn't hit the towers, that is pretty cut and dry.

What you will never sell me on is a huge plane hitting the pentagon and only doing the damage it did.

The security video, while short and vague, would show more than a split second flash if a 155ft plane was flying past it. Also no one in washington noticed a huge jetliner flying incredibly low towards the pentagon?
The way it crashed into the pentagon it would have to been flying very low for sometime in order to impact the way it did.

/tinfoil

500mph.. do some thinking. They didn't release continuous frames.. Go figure. Photochop?

Although the Pentagon crash was questionable, you can't say it's all fake.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
9/11: Debunking The Myths

Popular Mechanics March 05'
I don't see why people would try and say two commuter planes didn't hit the towers, that is pretty cut and dry.

What you will never sell me on is a huge plane hitting the pentagon and only doing the damage it did.

The security video, while short and vague, would show more than a split second flash if a 155ft plane was flying past it. Also no one in washington noticed a huge jetliner flying incredibly low towards the pentagon?
The way it crashed into the pentagon it would have to been flying very low for sometime in order to impact the way it did.

/tinfoil

People in washington did see the plane flying low, the pentagon couldnt track the 767 because it was too low, and the reason the damage was slight is because the pentagon is a military structure with reinforced walls and blast resistant windows.
 

noto12ious

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2001
1,131
0
0
thanks for the link.

great video. and it's not surprising...

i'll be passing this along to others.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |