iwearnosox
Lifer
- Oct 26, 2000
- 16,018
- 5
- 0
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
i have watched this video
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=74617
the upper left goes first, then lower left, then lower center.
i might have missed one, but at no point does a lower one go first.
and there is a HUGE error in the google vid you posted.
it ISOLATES your view, aka: you can NOT see any area other than the supposed "explosions"
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
and i quote
i have watched this video
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=74617
the upper left goes first, then lower left, then lower center.
i might have missed one, but at no point does a lower one go first.
and there is a HUGE error in the google vid you posted.
it ISOLATES your view, aka: you can NOT see any area other than the supposed "explosions"
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
He shouldn't bother. Conspiracy theorists blabber on and on about any inconsistency they can find ad nausea despite the miilion bits of evidence that prove otherwise. It's a behaviorial issue, you'll never accept facts the way rational people do. I don't pretend to be an expert in collapsing buildings but the forces in play are extreme- air, heat, millions of pounds of collapsing steel.
Go do something useful with your life instead of wasting your time with this crap. There's more qualified people that have already looked at this "evidence" and found it to be what it is- unfounded.
Had this been 50 years ago you'd be yammering on about the grassy knoll- which only now has had the magic bullet and multiple shots resolved through science. I'd sure WTC will pan out as it did.
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
He shouldn't bother. Conspiracy theorists blabber on and on about any inconsistency they can find ad nausea despite the miilion bits of evidence that prove otherwise. It's a behaviorial issue, you'll never accept facts the way rational people do. I don't pretend to be an expert in collapsing buildings but the forces in play are extreme- air, heat, millions of pounds of collapsing steel.
Go do something useful with your life instead of wasting your time with this crap. There's more qualified people that have already looked at this "evidence" and found it to be what it is- unfounded.
Had this been 50 years ago you'd be yammering on about the grassy knoll- which only now has had the magic bullet and multiple shots resolved through science. I'd sure WTC will pan out as it did.
Actually, all the links in my sig prove that the facts are founded
People had reason to "yammer" about the grassy knoll. The bullet through the windshield automatically destroyed the official story... but that's for another thread
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Thanks for bumping the thread so more people could see the evidence for themselves
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Thanks for bumping the thread so more people could see the evidence for themselves
No problem, I'm sure there's an aspiring psychologist in our midst somewhere, the longer this dribble is on the front page the more likely you're going to receive the care you require.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
3 shots fired is the "official" story. If you want to open up a JFK thread, go ahead and do so...I'll post some simple facts that would destroy the official government story about JFK.
Otherwise, this thread is for the truth about 9/11
This is a 9/11 thread. You brought up JFK.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
3 shots fired is the "official" story. If you want to open up a JFK thread, go ahead and do so...I'll post some simple facts that would destroy the official government story about JFK.
Otherwise, this thread is for the truth about 9/11
Lol. Just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes:
1. Is there a face on Mars?
2. Who killed Martin Luther King?
3. Did we land on the moon?
4. Do aliens live amongst us?
5. Lochness monster, fish or fantasy?
6. Crop circles- artistic aliens or bored farm hands?
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Thanks for bumping the thread so more people could see the evidence for themselves
No problem, I'm sure there's an aspiring psychologist in our midst somewhere, the longer this dribble is on the front page the more likely you're going to receive the care you require.
Some people will never be open to the true facts...so if that's what makes you sleep better at night, that's your prerogative...again, thanks for bumping up this information on how WTC#7 fell faster than the speed of gravity due to a vacuum
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Thanks for bumping the thread so more people could see the evidence for themselves
No problem, I'm sure there's an aspiring psychologist in our midst somewhere, the longer this dribble is on the front page the more likely you're going to receive the care you require.
Some people will never be open to the true facts...so if that's what makes you sleep better at night, that's your prerogative...again, thanks for bumping up this information on how WTC#7 fell faster than the speed of gravity due to a vacuum
I'm open to rational arguments, not biased and flawed amatuer implosion analysis. There are people smarter and more educated than you or I that have laughed at these "facts" for sure.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
This is a 9/11 thread. You brought up JFK.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
3 shots fired is the "official" story. If you want to open up a JFK thread, go ahead and do so...I'll post some simple facts that would destroy the official government story about JFK.
Otherwise, this thread is for the truth about 9/11
Lol. Just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes:
1. Is there a face on Mars?
2. Who killed Martin Luther King?
3. Did we land on the moon?
4. Do aliens live amongst us?
5. Lochness monster, fish or fantasy?
6. Crop circles- artistic aliens or bored farm hands?
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since it's obvious mikey refuses to address how I just destroyed his pancaking theory, here's something else that doesn't get enough attention, imo.
WTC7 collapses faster than the speed of gravity because of a vacuum:
From the video 9/11 Eyewitness:
(from time frame 1:15:44)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...0438587461603&q=911+eyewitness&pl=true
A fleeing maid left a dyson on in the lobby. I have one myself, they're quite powerful.
Thanks for bumping the thread so more people could see the evidence for themselves
No problem, I'm sure there's an aspiring psychologist in our midst somewhere, the longer this dribble is on the front page the more likely you're going to receive the care you require.
Some people will never be open to the true facts...so if that's what makes you sleep better at night, that's your prerogative...again, thanks for bumping up this information on how WTC#7 fell faster than the speed of gravity due to a vacuum
I'm open to rational arguments, not biased and flawed amatuer implosion analysis. There are people smarter and more educated than you or I that have laughed at these "facts" for sure.
None of your questions have any relevance to 9/11. Mars? Don't care. MLK? Never cared about who killed him. Moon? Never heard of an argument denying the official landing...but now that you mention it, I'll see what people are talking about. Aliens..who knows? Lochness, don't care, probably fantasy. crop circles have been proven to be falsified, iirc.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
This is a 9/11 thread. You brought up JFK.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
3 shots fired is the "official" story. If you want to open up a JFK thread, go ahead and do so...I'll post some simple facts that would destroy the official government story about JFK.
Otherwise, this thread is for the truth about 9/11
Lol. Just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes:
1. Is there a face on Mars?
2. Who killed Martin Luther King?
3. Did we land on the moon?
4. Do aliens live amongst us?
5. Lochness monster, fish or fantasy?
6. Crop circles- artistic aliens or bored farm hands?
And now I brought up more than that. It's quite telling of your "perspective." Perhaps it will help others trust your opinion if you let us know your thoughts on other matters. Go on, inquiring minds want to know.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
noto12ious stop the madness, you're absurd, as is this thread.
Why stop when the facts are on my side? That is, the truth's side
Notice how mikey can't address the links i just posted above? He can't refute the evidence :thumbsup:
and i quote
i have watched this video
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=74617
the upper left goes first, then lower left, then lower center.
i might have missed one, but at no point does a lower one go first.
and there is a HUGE error in the google vid you posted.
it ISOLATES your view, aka: you can NOT see any area other than the supposed "explosions"
Do explain how that link refutes this? Remember, YOU tried to dismiss the squibs as being the result of pancaking:
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/demolition.wave.170.jpg
The lower squib is cleary shown appearing first...as shown in Loose Change 2nd Edition.
The upper squib is clearly shown appearing a few seconds later...as shown again in Loose Change 2nd Edition.
Video here: (Time frame 52:13 - 52:25)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid...9923762628848&q=loose+change+2&pl=true
So much for the pancaking theory
How can there ben an "error" in that video...when it is factual evidence? Look at you trying to dodge the presented jpg image. LOL at you.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
None of your questions have any relevance to 9/11. Mars? Don't care. MLK? Never cared about who killed him. Moon? Never heard of an argument denying the official landing...but now that you mention it, I'll see what people are talking about. Aliens..who knows? Lochness, don't care, probably fantasy. crop circles have been proven to be falsified, iirc.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
This is a 9/11 thread. You brought up JFK.Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
The bullet through the windshield
WHAT? there were 3 shots fired, not ONE through the windsheild.
3 shots fired is the "official" story. If you want to open up a JFK thread, go ahead and do so...I'll post some simple facts that would destroy the official government story about JFK.
Otherwise, this thread is for the truth about 9/11
Lol. Just to see how deep the rabbit hole goes:
1. Is there a face on Mars?
2. Who killed Martin Luther King?
3. Did we land on the moon?
4. Do aliens live amongst us?
5. Lochness monster, fish or fantasy?
6. Crop circles- artistic aliens or bored farm hands?
And now I brought up more than that. It's quite telling of your "perspective." Perhaps it will help others trust your opinion if you let us know your thoughts on other matters. Go on, inquiring minds want to know.
Now, go dig up your facts refuting all the points i made 1 post above