911 - Missile in airplane???

[bauerbrazil]

I dont know if this subject was discussed before, i just saw this site today and find this really interesting.

Could this be a hoax?

http://letsroll911.org/

 

[Czar]

you got this in an email didnt you

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Let me guess, Bush paid these guys to fly a plane with a pre-installed missile launcher on it to wreak havoc on NY so he could steal the Iraqi's oil?

 

[bauerbrazil]

Originally posted by: Czar
you got this in an email didnt you

No hehehe, just saw this link in another forum.

So, these images were made up or what?

 

[conjur]

LOL!

A missile fired. :roll:

If you look at their "slowed down" video, you see a quck flash. That's the nose of the plane hitting the building.

 

[DealMonkey]

That's the stupidest theory I've seen yet concerning 9/11.

 

[bauerbrazil]

Originally posted by: conjur
LOL!

A missile fired. :roll:

If you look at their "slowed down" video, you see a quck flash. That's the nose of the plane hitting the building.

I think about that too, but i found strange that thing under the plane.

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: DealMonkey
That's the stupidest theory I've seen yet concerning 9/11.

Mine or theirs?

 

[dmcowen674]

Idiots, that's reflection of impact off the plate glass windows. :roll:

Then it's dark because everything is going in through the building.

Real Genuises :roll:

Feel sad for them going though life that brainless.

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Idiots, that's reflection of impact off the plate glass windows. :roll:

Then it's dark because everything is going in through the building.

Real Genuises :roll:

Feel sad for them going though life that brainless.

I agree with you this time, Dave; we must blame Al Gore, though, for if he did not sign the Constitution and create the Internet, this kind of nonsense wouldn't exacerbate the number of members in the ICTC -Internet Conspiracy Theory Club.

 

[DealMonkey]

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: DealMonkey

That's the stupidest theory I've seen yet concerning 9/11.

Mine or theirs?

The whole premise of this thread . . . stupid.

 

[chrisms]

I think the real genius behind this plan, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, is that even if some parts of it are foiled the American people will always pass it off as "stupid." The Bush Administration could have created 9/11 with the knowledge that if evidence leaked out to the public that they had, no media outlet would have the guts to report it and thus is would be left to the "whackos" to tell the truth.

I'm not saying I believe these theories, but it is necessary to look at them with an open mind. Anything is possible. I think the most concrete evidence I've seen to support these theories is that airplane fuel is not hot enough to burn steel (which is the official explanation as to why the towers fell). Also, after the support beams were supposedly melted, the building fell in a perfect implosion at the speed of a freefall (wouldn't it come down slower, as the top runs through to bottom portion of the tower?).

Then of course there is the fact that fighter planes were delayed an hour . . . these theorists say that there must have been a military order to go against the law of having them in the air within 10 minutes.

One of the WTC buildings was pulled (intentionally brought down) by the orders of the owner. Videotape of that building before it fell shows that the fires were only on a few of the floors, and pulling it was not necessary. People were still inside at the time, and the owner collected a bunch of insurance money.

There are some very suspicious things about 9/11, and while I do not think it was a plot entirely concieved and funded by the Bush Administration, the evidence supporting that theory is strong enough to where some day I hope there is an investigation into it.

 

[DBL]

Originally posted by: chrisms
I think the real genius behind this plan, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, is that even if some parts of it are foiled the American people will always pass it off as "stupid." The Bush Administration could have created 9/11 with the knowledge that if evidence leaked out to the public that they had, no media outlet would have the guts to report it and thus is would be left to the "whackos" to tell the truth.

I'm not saying I believe these theories, but it is necessary to look at them with an open mind. Anything is possible. I think the most concrete evidence I've seen to support these theories is that airplane fuel is not hot enough to burn steel (which is the official explanation as to why the towers fell).

BS. Have you accepted that explanation at face value or have you researched it?

Also, after the support beams were supposedly melted, the building fell in a perfect implosion at the speed of a freefall (wouldn't it come down slower, as the top runs through to bottom portion of the tower?).

That's the way it was designed to fall. Again, is this what you read on some conspiracy site?

Then of course there is the fact that fighter planes were delayed an hour . . . these theorists say that there must have been a military order to go against the law of having them in the air within 10 minutes.

Sorry, but this has been explained numerous times before if you care to look it up.

One of the WTC buildings was pulled (intentionally brought down) by the orders of the owner. Videotape of that building before it fell shows that the fires were only on a few of the floors, and pulling it was not necessary. People were still inside at the time, and the owner collected a bunch of insurance money.

Haha! That's a new one. I'm sorry but you would have to be a few IQ points short of retarded to believe that one. It makes entirely no sense.

There are some very suspicious things about 9/11, and while I do not think it was a plot entirely concieved and funded by the Bush Administration, the evidence supporting that theory is strong enough to where some day I hope there is an investigation into it.

Look. I'm no fan of Bush but attitudes like yours scare me just as much if not more. Based on a couple of wacko Internet sites, you are willing to believe that the President of the US willfully engaged in a plot to murder almost 3K US citizens, in order to satisfy some political goal. Geez! Talk about delusional.

 

[daniel1113]

LOL... thanks, I needed a good laugh

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Idiots, that's reflection of impact off the plate glass windows. :roll:



Then it's dark because everything is going in through the building.



Real Genuises :roll:



Feel sad for them going though life that brainless.

I agree with you this time, Dave; we must blame Al Gore, though, for if he did not sign the Constitution and create the Internet, this kind of nonsense wouldn't exacerbate the number of members in the ICTC -Internet Conspiracy Theory Club.

click me

 

[LTC8K6]

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/559657/M/


Looks like the bulge housing the landing gear to me. The right side bulge is lit up by the sun and the left side bulge is shaded, making the right bulge more noticeable. Add to that the crappy quality, and voila, a missile pod!

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: chrisms
I think the real genius behind this plan, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, is that even if some parts of it are foiled the American people will always pass it off as "stupid." The Bush Administration could have created 9/11 with the knowledge that if evidence leaked out to the public that they had, no media outlet would have the guts to report it and thus is would be left to the "whackos" to tell the truth.

I'm not saying I believe these theories, but it is necessary to look at them with an open mind. Anything is possible. I think the most concrete evidence I've seen to support these theories is that airplane fuel is not hot enough to burn steel (which is the official explanation as to why the towers fell). Also, after the support beams were supposedly melted, the building fell in a perfect implosion at the speed of a freefall (wouldn't it come down slower, as the top runs through to bottom portion of the tower?).

Then of course there is the fact that fighter planes were delayed an hour . . . these theorists say that there must have been a military order to go against the law of having them in the air within 10 minutes.

One of the WTC buildings was pulled (intentionally brought down) by the orders of the owner. Videotape of that building before it fell shows that the fires were only on a few of the floors, and pulling it was not necessary. People were still inside at the time, and the owner collected a bunch of insurance money.

There are some very suspicious things about 9/11, and while I do not think it was a plot entirely concieved and funded by the Bush Administration, the evidence supporting that theory is strong enough to where some day I hope there is an investigation into it.

For crying out loud. I had friends that were part of the building contractors of the WTC and I watched them be built.

You get enough of the upper floors to buckle and the shear weight was simply a downward domino stack.

The first building was hit low enough that it nearly tipped over and almost didn't come straight down. That would've taken a bunch more of the city out.

 

[MegaWorks]

I wouldn't be shock if the CIA knew or made 9/11, Killing your own people to acheive your goals around the world why not! to get support to it's Wars around the world, use patriotism to get people joine the army and support for future conflicts

 

[chrisms]

DBL, you've provided nothing but insults and rhetoric (you tell me to 'look it up' instead of showing facts), and your writing off of the theories as "wacko" is exactly what scares me today. I suppose there are some things we dare not question because they are too out of line from what the media tells us.

"Some political goal"? I don't want to sound contradictory by telling you to just 'look it up,' but the complexities of groups like the Project for the New American Century and the goals of the Bush Administration are too much for me to explain here. In order to achieve those goals, it is possible that they could have seen justification in killing 3,000 Americans in order to better the country and world for the future.

I don't believe Bush created 9/11, as you assume I do (although I clearly stated otherwise in my first post.) I do believe that there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation to find who did create it, and if in the end it is found that it was Osama bin Laden well then I wouldn't be surprised.

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: MegaWorks
I wouldn't be shock if the CIA knew or made 9/11, Killing your own people to acheive your goals around the world why not! to get support to it's Wars around the world, use patriotism to get people joine the army and support for future conflicts

Ah, yes...always nice to hear the words of wisdom coming out of Canada. Perhaps you can help your friend Marty out--please list 3 contributions your country has made to the betterment of the human condition....once you actually do something for yourselves and stop being bottom-feeders to the north, perhaps we'll take you seriously.

 

[DBL]

Originally posted by: chrisms
DBL, you've provided nothing but insults and rhetoric (you tell me to 'look it up' instead of showing facts), and your writing off of the theories as "wacko" is exactly what scares me today. I suppose there are some things we dare not question because they are too out of line from what the media tells us.

I tell you to look it up b/c these topics have been discussed multiple times before and I don't really feel like wasting my time. Perhaps someone else will take you up on your offer? BTW, it's strange that you would accuse me of insults, rhetoric and failure to provide facts when you provided only some rambling nonsensical ideas and not one link to a well thought out and investigated factual site.

"Some political goal"? I don't want to sound contradictory by telling you to just 'look it up,' but the complexities of groups like the Project for the New American Century and the goals of the Bush Administration are too much for me to explain here. In order to achieve those goals, it is possible that they could have seen justification in killing 3,000 Americans in order to better the country and world for the future.

Almost anything is possible. What's your point? Is it probable? Is there evidence to support this idea? Is there not overwhelming evidence to debunk these ideas? Some things are not worth the time and effort to refute b/c they have no grounding in actual events and facts and as such, will always be relegated to the domain of conspiracy wackos.

I don't believe Bush created 9/11, as you assume I do (although I clearly stated otherwise in my first post.) I do believe that there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation to find who did create it, and if in the end it is found that it was Osama bin Laden well then I wouldn't be surprised.

Hmm. OBL willingly confessed and there is a mountain of evidence to suggest that it was an Al Qaeda operation. What more can you possibly want?

Let's see. You don't believe Bush was responsible for 9/11 but you support an investigation into who did do it. That must mean your not convinced it was Al Qaeda either. What's your theory? The Pope? Ariel Sharon? Elvis?

 

[chrisms]

I support an investigation because after reading the conspiracy theories, I am convinced there is enough evidence supporting them to warrant a more detailed look. While I don't believe they are correct, if they were it would be such a horrible crime that I would not want to risk it going unpunished because the government doesn't have the guts to look into it.

It's like if you're investigating a murder and you find a guy with the victim's blood on a knife in his house. Of course you're going to arrest him and charge him, but if the victim's husband just collected a bunch of money on his wife's new insurance policy, well then I'd say you should look into him as well.