- Mar 21, 2000
- 359
- 0
- 0
I dont know if this subject was discussed before, i just saw this site today and find this really interesting.
Could this be a hoax?
http://letsroll911.org/
Could this be a hoax?
http://letsroll911.org/
Originally posted by: Czar
you got this in an email didnt you
Originally posted by: conjur
LOL!
A missile fired. :roll:
If you look at their "slowed down" video, you see a quck flash. That's the nose of the plane hitting the building.
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
That's the stupidest theory I've seen yet concerning 9/11.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Idiots, that's reflection of impact off the plate glass windows. :roll:
Then it's dark because everything is going in through the building.
Real Genuises :roll:
Feel sad for them going though life that brainless.
The whole premise of this thread . . . stupid.Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
That's the stupidest theory I've seen yet concerning 9/11.
Mine or theirs?
Originally posted by: chrisms
I think the real genius behind this plan, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, is that even if some parts of it are foiled the American people will always pass it off as "stupid." The Bush Administration could have created 9/11 with the knowledge that if evidence leaked out to the public that they had, no media outlet would have the guts to report it and thus is would be left to the "whackos" to tell the truth.
I'm not saying I believe these theories, but it is necessary to look at them with an open mind. Anything is possible. I think the most concrete evidence I've seen to support these theories is that airplane fuel is not hot enough to burn steel (which is the official explanation as to why the towers fell).
Also, after the support beams were supposedly melted, the building fell in a perfect implosion at the speed of a freefall (wouldn't it come down slower, as the top runs through to bottom portion of the tower?).
Then of course there is the fact that fighter planes were delayed an hour . . . these theorists say that there must have been a military order to go against the law of having them in the air within 10 minutes.
One of the WTC buildings was pulled (intentionally brought down) by the orders of the owner. Videotape of that building before it fell shows that the fires were only on a few of the floors, and pulling it was not necessary. People were still inside at the time, and the owner collected a bunch of insurance money.
There are some very suspicious things about 9/11, and while I do not think it was a plot entirely concieved and funded by the Bush Administration, the evidence supporting that theory is strong enough to where some day I hope there is an investigation into it.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Idiots, that's reflection of impact off the plate glass windows. :roll:
Then it's dark because everything is going in through the building.
Real Genuises :roll:
Feel sad for them going though life that brainless.
I agree with you this time, Dave; we must blame Al Gore, though, for if he did not sign the Constitution and create the Internet, this kind of nonsense wouldn't exacerbate the number of members in the ICTC -Internet Conspiracy Theory Club.
Originally posted by: chrisms
I think the real genius behind this plan, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, is that even if some parts of it are foiled the American people will always pass it off as "stupid." The Bush Administration could have created 9/11 with the knowledge that if evidence leaked out to the public that they had, no media outlet would have the guts to report it and thus is would be left to the "whackos" to tell the truth.
I'm not saying I believe these theories, but it is necessary to look at them with an open mind. Anything is possible. I think the most concrete evidence I've seen to support these theories is that airplane fuel is not hot enough to burn steel (which is the official explanation as to why the towers fell). Also, after the support beams were supposedly melted, the building fell in a perfect implosion at the speed of a freefall (wouldn't it come down slower, as the top runs through to bottom portion of the tower?).
Then of course there is the fact that fighter planes were delayed an hour . . . these theorists say that there must have been a military order to go against the law of having them in the air within 10 minutes.
One of the WTC buildings was pulled (intentionally brought down) by the orders of the owner. Videotape of that building before it fell shows that the fires were only on a few of the floors, and pulling it was not necessary. People were still inside at the time, and the owner collected a bunch of insurance money.
There are some very suspicious things about 9/11, and while I do not think it was a plot entirely concieved and funded by the Bush Administration, the evidence supporting that theory is strong enough to where some day I hope there is an investigation into it.
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
I wouldn't be shock if the CIA knew or made 9/11, Killing your own people to acheive your goals around the world why not! to get support to it's Wars around the world, use patriotism to get people joine the army and support for future conflicts
Originally posted by: chrisms
DBL, you've provided nothing but insults and rhetoric (you tell me to 'look it up' instead of showing facts), and your writing off of the theories as "wacko" is exactly what scares me today. I suppose there are some things we dare not question because they are too out of line from what the media tells us.
"Some political goal"? I don't want to sound contradictory by telling you to just 'look it up,' but the complexities of groups like the Project for the New American Century and the goals of the Bush Administration are too much for me to explain here. In order to achieve those goals, it is possible that they could have seen justification in killing 3,000 Americans in order to better the country and world for the future.
I don't believe Bush created 9/11, as you assume I do (although I clearly stated otherwise in my first post.) I do believe that there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation to find who did create it, and if in the end it is found that it was Osama bin Laden well then I wouldn't be surprised.