Amol S.

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,397
709
136
This years 92nd Academy Awards was quite different than previous ones. A major difference was that this year the "Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film" has been replaced by "Academy Award for Best International Feature Film", where the international film is allowed to win other Oscars, as well as best picture. This years award also went to the film that won "Academy Award for Best International Feature Film", which is the Korean film "Parasite".

Other new things were introduced in this years Oscar, this years orchestral performance was conducted by a female orchastrator. A major topic that was prominent in this years Oscars was the theme of empowerment (woman, race, and ect.).

During the final song performance that showed the actors that we loved that had passed away this year, the first person to be shown was Kobe Bryant, the basketball player who recently died in a helicopter crash. Singing from the Grammy winner was great.

There was comedy jokes in the Oscar as well this year.

I give it a 5 filled circles (5 out of 5) ◙◙◙◙◙

PS: can someone add a star emoji, to the emoji menu please.
 

UncleWai

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2001
5,701
68
91
Pretentious trash. Best picture category has been a joke, always with that M Night Shytmalan twist trying to be smarter than the general public.
 

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
7,461
500
126
Pretentious trash. Best picture category has been a joke, always with that M Night Shytmalan twist trying to be smarter than the general public.

Some decent films this year but they just had to give it to a foreign language film. Wut?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,474
27,748
136
The comments here just write themselves. Of course the same whiny criticism has been flung at the Oscars since the Oscars began. Yet, people keep watching the show. The Oscars show exists because it's incredibly cheap to produce and always gets the ratings.
 

NoTine42

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2013
1,387
78
91
The In Memorandum montage did not include Luke Perry, who was in one of the night’s nominated films, “Once soon a time in Hollywood”.
They were correct to include Kobe, who won an Oscar.

Eminem surprised everyone and showed up to the Oscars 17 years late to give a live performance of his Oscar winning, “Lose yourself”
 

Chromagnus

Senior member
Feb 28, 2017
255
111
86
A lot of times the Oscars suck and get it wrong but Parasite was definitely the best movie this year and deserved to win.
 

ondma

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2018
2,768
1,350
136
Havent seen Parasite. I would have liked to see Ford v Ferrari win. Also saw The Irishman and Marriage Story. Both were well done, but glad neither won best picture.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,472
867
126
Havent seen Parasite. I would have liked to see Ford v Ferrari win. Also saw The Irishman and Marriage Story. Both were well done, but glad neither won best picture.

I'm glad Joaquin Pheonix won for best actor. He deserved it. His speech however was a bit crazy. I thought they would play him off quickly but they didn't.

I haven't seen Parasite either but am kind of curious now since it won so many awards. I may have to check it out.

Also, as much as I like Jimmy Kimmel and him hosting the Oscars it just drags them out that much longer. The no host format seems to help keep it under the alloted time limit.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,493
3,159
136
Parasite?
One of those movies Hollywood has a circle jerk over but no one will actually ever go see it because for the subtitles, plus its a foreign film.
Another one of those winning films that most of America will never watch.
So they won, so whats the point?

And Once Upon A Time In Hollywood ???
Seriously?
It was in the theaters for what? About one week?

The awards are really more about craft than anything else.
An awards show for those within the industry with an understanding of inner workings and of interest only to those within the industry and not so much for the general public. Like watching a medical convention hosted by Tom Hanks with doctors and professionals talking about their craft.
And that craft is how and why winners are chosen as they are and why to the general public a lot of those winning choices make absolutely no sense.

If this were an oil painting awards show, the winning paintings would be quite misunderstood and abstract while to the general public the winning paintings should be of pretty lakes and sunsets.
 
Last edited:

KeithP

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2000
5,660
198
106
The comments here just write themselves. Of course the same whiny criticism has been flung at the Oscars since the Oscars began. Yet, people keep watching the show. The Oscars show exists because it's incredibly cheap to produce and always gets the ratings.

I don't follow the Oscars that closely but the haven't the ratings been steadily declining?

-KeithP
 

ondma

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2018
2,768
1,350
136
I'm glad Joaquin Pheonix won for best actor. He deserved it. His speech however was a bit crazy. I thought they would play him off quickly but they didn't.

I haven't seen Parasite either but am kind of curious now since it won so many awards. I may have to check it out.

Also, as much as I like Jimmy Kimmel and him hosting the Oscars it just drags them out that much longer. The no host format seems to help keep it under the alloted time limit.
Yea, he deserved it. The speech *was* bizarre though. I am a Christian Bale fan, thought he was great in Ford V Ferrari. Also though Matt Damon should have been nominated for playing Carroll Shelby. He did a great job.
 

Chromagnus

Senior member
Feb 28, 2017
255
111
86
Parasite?
One of those movies Hollywood has a circle jerk over but no one will actually ever go see it because for the subtitles, plus its a foreign film.
Another one of those winning films that most of America will never watch.
So they won, so whats the point?

It's an amazing movie and people shouldn't be scared off from subtitles to actually see it. The point is that they gave the award for best movie to the best movie, this year it just happens to be a Korean movie.
 

Chromagnus

Senior member
Feb 28, 2017
255
111
86
I don't follow the Oscars that closely but the haven't the ratings been steadily declining?

-KeithP

Probably, but ratings have been steadily declining for basically everything (except possibly sports). Fewer people are watching live TV.
 
Reactions: Ken g6

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,472
867
126
Parasite?
One of those movies Hollywood has a circle jerk over but no one will actually ever go see it because for the subtitles, plus its a foreign film.
Another one of those winning films that most of America will never watch.
So they won, so whats the point?

And Once Upon A Time In Hollywood ???
Seriously?
It was in the theaters for what? About one week?

The awards are really more about craft than anything else.
An awards show for those within the industry with an understanding of inner workings and of interest only to those within the industry and not so much for the general public. Like watching a medical convention hosted by Tom Hanks with doctors and professionals talking about their craft.
And that craft is how and why winners are chosen as they are and why to the general public a lot of those winning choices make absolutely no sense.

If this were an oil painting awards show, the winning paintings would be quite misunderstood and abstract while to the general public the winning paintings should be of pretty lakes and sunsets.

I liked Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. It was original, well written and of course well acted.

I generally only watch these shows when I've actually seen some of the movies up for an award. My wife likes to watch them too so I don't mind watching them with her.
 

OccamsToothbrush

Golden Member
Aug 21, 2005
1,389
825
136
The comments here just write themselves. Of course the same whiny criticism has been flung at the Oscars since the Oscars began. Yet, people keep watching the show. The Oscars show exists because it's incredibly cheap to produce and always gets the ratings.

The Oscars show existed long before there were ratings to get. And the Oscars show will continue to exist even if California falls into the ocean and the only people left in show biz are a few interns who happened to be in New York at the time. They'll dress up and give each other awards because that's all the Oscars has even been. A circle jerk of self-satisfication with no more real world relevance than the Mid-West Toner Salesman of the Year Award. They ACT like it's important and some idiots believe them.
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,282
3,903
75
It's an amazing movie and people shouldn't be scared off from subtitles to actually see it.
I wouldn't mind subtitles for certain movies from decades ago. (Godzilla comes to mind.) But this is 2020. If you want to release a foreign-language film in America these days, you should pay for a proper voice dub and deepfake lip syncing.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,803
29,553
146
I wouldn't mind subtitles for certain movies from decades ago. (Godzilla comes to mind.) But this is 2020. If you want to release a foreign-language film in America these days, you should pay for a proper voice dub and deepfake lip syncing.

oh hell no.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
96,112
15,760
126
I wouldn't mind subtitles for certain movies from decades ago. (Godzilla comes to mind.) But this is 2020. If you want to release a foreign-language film in America these days, you should pay for a proper voice dub and deepfake lip syncing.


Why?
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,282
3,903
75
So it looks like it was originally made in the language of every country you release it in.*

So you can keep your eyes on the screen and not have to constantly be reading words at the bottom.

* If it's done properly. Too many studios cheap out on their visual effects these days.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
96,112
15,760
126
So it looks like it was originally made in the language of every country you release it in.*

So you can keep your eyes on the screen and not have to constantly be reading words at the bottom.

* If it's done properly. Too many studios cheap out on their visual effects these days.


Dub sucks. There is no way you are going to pay actors enough to do a good job on conveying the original performance.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |