Originally posted by: LTC8K6
I think you need a 9600XT to come close to a 9500Pro. The 9500Pro is generally far superior to the 9600Pro, and sometimes clearly beats the XT even when running with AA and AF. Only in a couple instances do the 9600's pull a bit ahead of the 9500pro.
agreed, if you can find one, and for a decent price.
OP, I'd get the 9600XT if you could get the seller to match the Geforce's price.
If they are not equal price, go with the Geforce.. hands down.
you probably wont be able to find the 9500pro/9600xt for the price of a GF4. They are still great bargains.
I use a leadtek 128MB AGP8X TI4200 and play HL2/Doom3 just fine@960x600 at whatever the default display quality settings are.
im not too picky though, and am upgrading soon to a much more powerful card.
if you have the cash, i'd suggest a 6600/GT or 6800/gt geforce. otherwise, the Geforce4s are holding up well in price/performance.
For your situation, considering the curent market, I'd get either: one of the Geforce 4TIs or 9600Pro (not the EZ version or another slower model, make sure the memory bandwidth, core and memory speed at least match what is listed for the 9600pro on ATI's website).
I was between a GF4 and 9600 Pro myself a year ago and went with the GF4 personally, Nvidia drivers have been very reliable across a broad selection of games (both OGL/D3D) and worked well with my systems for years.
So I gave up DX9 support for Nvidia drivers.. worth it in my book. The whole system just runs much more "streamlined", even in the Luna GUI over my ATI cards.