:)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,692
6,133
136
Originally posted by: JustaGeek
So we are not going to talk about the processors anymore...?

It's seems the topic has changed to red haired women, the OP doesn't seem to like them.
 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
rofl, this is most hilarious thread I've seen on AT so far I guess he's dyslexic and took 2 hours to write the thread, then got called out on grammar/spelling errors and that made him go berserk
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Settle down thread starter. You made the right decision in your purchase.

As for people who don't think that More than 60fps is useless. Try this test if you have the equipment. Take an old PC. Play A game like BHD. Online you will notice enemies appearing and than disappearing than A few seconds they come from were you orginally seen them. Now play same game with C2D and NV 8800gtx. Same internet connection. You will notice right away no more Ghost players instead you become the ghost.

This pc with 1950 pro runs average around 170 FPS. With my gaming system I run about 250 FPS. Its a hugh differance in online game play hugh.

As for the differance between AMD and Intel at high res. Its not a big differance until the next generation gpu's come out. Than its a new ball game. All indications are showing Phenom is't going to improve that situation much. So a 1 1/2 year old C2D system will still spank AMD's native Q core . Thats what I call value. Now if you game at low res. Which many do in competition the differances are infact hugh and at A lan event. C2D pawn K8 plan and simple. now limiting the FPS as some games do . Is bad for the industry . If all things are = than NO reason to upgrade. Bad for hardware makers.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Settle down thread starter. You made the right decision in your purchase.

As for people who don't think that More than 60fps is useless. Try this test if you have the equipment. Take an old PC. Play A game like BHD. Online you will notice enemies appearing and than disappearing than A few seconds they come from were you orginally seen them. Now play same game with C2D and NV 8800gtx. Same internet connection. You will notice right away no more Ghost players instead you become the ghost.

This pc with 1950 pro runs average around 170 FPS. With my gaming system I run about 250 FPS. Its a hugh differance in online game play hugh.

As for the differance between AMD and Intel at high res. Its not a big differance until the next generation gpu's come out. Than its a new ball game. All indications are showing Phenom is't going to improve that situation much. So a 1 1/2 year old C2D system will still spank AMD's native Q core . Thats what I call value. Now if you game at low res. Which many do in competition the differances are infact hugh and at A lan event. C2D pawn K8 plan and simple. now limiting the FPS as some games do . Is bad for the industry . If all things are = than NO reason to upgrade. Bad for hardware makers.

I don't know what articles you've been reading, Phenom has been "apparently" been beating C2D outright. It's not even made to compete with it, it's competition is supposed to be the new Intel CPUs.
 

AmberClad

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
4,914
0
0
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
rofl, this is most hilarious thread I've seen on AT so far I guess he's dyslexic and took 2 hours to write the thread, then got called out on grammar/spelling errors and that made him go berserk
Well, to be fair, his first response to being schooled in proper grammar and spelling was fairly non-psychotic (although most of you probably didn't see it in the brief time before he changed it). But he decided to edit that reply to something railing against ginger-haired women for some reason, a few minutes later.

*shrugs*
 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
Maybe his dad decided he shouldn't have to put up with that crap and change things into ******* ginger-twat ? That might explain the old-school cussing ?

As for nemesis, wtf? How can 170vs250fps be a huge difference? It's completely irrelevant lol, because your monitors refresh rate prolly caps out at 100 or so, making fps above 100 'invisible' so to speak. And most games are GPU limited, so saying C2D pawn K8 plan and simple is a very weird statement, at best, I'd say more leaning towards bullshit. You're obviously a Intel fanboy. Some people can tell the difference between 60 and 70fps, but much above that there simply is no difference, not a difference the human eye can see at least.
 

soybeast

Senior member
Apr 26, 2006
255
0
76
rofl wow. There's actually a half decent discussion going on in a thread that says "Fuck off GINGER TWAT!"

Clearly I need to rethink everything I thought I knew about starting discussions.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Well could you link to those articles were K10 beats C2D in gaming . Good luck at finding such an article. Based on what we have seen so far only . K10 is a litle stronger than K8 2-3% is all. Its not going to improve much even if some members here say it will . When its all said and done I will show those threads and what the over hyping members stated.

One member here yesterday stated that a penryn 3.6 or higher isn't possiable from intel because it would go abovw 125 watts, At the same time he ignored K10 @ 2.6 will be @ 125 watts. So were is the room for K10 to improve on a outdated SOI tech that has hugh leakage problems the smaller the process becomes.

Thats just pure fud by that member. Intel is on a bran new transitor tech. So there is alot of room for improvement. Most would agree . Not all most. AMD is on soi. @ 65 . So AMD has to face up to the fact they either have to leave SOI @45nm or play spin the bottle.

Either way @ 45nm AMD is in trouble . Use soi which is having hugh problems scaling up at 65nm. Or go to Bulk stressed. Which will be a learning process for AMD. Either way AMD is in a world of hurt. Its not the end of the world but intel is hitting on all cylinders.

Its going to be a rough road for AMD. Harder than its ever been. Once Nehalem and Larrabee come out in 08 its not going to get easier.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
Maybe his dad decided he shouldn't have to put up with that crap and change things into ******* ginger-twat ? That might explain the old-school cussing ?

As for nemesis, wtf? How can 170vs250fps be a huge difference? It's completely irrelevant lol, because your monitors refresh rate prolly caps out at 100 or so, making fps above 100 'invisible' so to speak. And most games are GPU limited, so saying C2D pawn K8 plan and simple is a very weird statement, at best, I'd say more leaning towards bullshit. You're obviously a Intel fanboy. Some people can tell the difference between 60 and 70fps, but much above that there simply is no difference, not a difference the human eye can see at least.

Wasn't talking about what the human I can see. I was referring to online gameplay or lan events were FPS aren't limited. I am sure I am not only person who has seen Ghosting players that seem to be in 1 place while they are infact in another area. Some call it lag and its not just connection lag. If my PC is sending a single to the server of 250fps. and an enemy is sending 150fps in same area of map the 150 fps player is going to lag to 250fps players machine . There is more than 1 form of lagg. AMD suffers from the form of lagg I just discribed. Badly.
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
If anything, the OP should be mad that he didn't splurge for a 8800gtx, because unless he wants to play at 1024x768, a dual core cpu is not what he should be worried about.
 

SniperDaws

Senior member
Aug 14, 2007
762
0
0
im not keen on these forums, its full of egg heads who would prefer to pick at your grammer than interact with the original topic.

Most of you i like, but there are some really annoying geeks on here.

 

Ballashoes

Junior Member
Jul 18, 2005
15
0
0
Originally posted by: SniperDaws
im not keen on these forums, its full of egg heads who would prefer to pick at your grammer than interact with the original topic.

Most of you i like, but there are some really annoying geeks on here.

I'm not keen on these forums, it's full of egg heads who would prefer to pick at your grammar than interact with the original topic.

Most of you I like, but they're some really annoying geeks on here.



 

SniperDaws

Senior member
Aug 14, 2007
762
0
0
Originally posted by: Ballashoes
Originally posted by: SniperDaws
im not keen on these forums, its full of egg heads who would prefer to pick at your grammer than interact with the original topic.

Most of you i like, but there are some really annoying geeks on here.

I'm not keen on these forums, it's full of egg heads who would prefer to pick at your grammar than interact with the original topic.

Most of you I like, but they're some really annoying geeks on here.

lmao

Goodnight God bless

 

21stHermit

Senior member
Dec 16, 2003
927
1
81
Originally posted by: gingerstewart55
Originally posted by: SniperDaws
where are the doubters now?

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3127&p=4

All you Dual Core owners can suck lemons, if id of listened to you i would of missed out.

I'd personally clean up your rant by substituting the proper word "HAVE" where you have "OF"......like this......

"All you Dual Core owners can suck lemons, if I'd HAVE listened to you I would HAVE missed out."

I know when you say it "I would've" it sounds a lot like "I would of", but it's have, not of.

Welcome to 3rd grade English.
:thumbsup:

 

MetaDFF

Member
Mar 2, 2007
145
0
76
Originally posted by: munky
If anything, the OP should be mad that he didn't splurge for a 8800gtx, because unless he wants to play at 1024x768, a dual core cpu is not what he should be worried about.

I totally agree with that analysis :thumbsup:

On a side note... this thread has turned into a circus. :roll:
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Ballashoes
Most of you I like, but they're some really annoying geeks on here.

Anyone that failed third grade grammar should not be trying to give grammar advice. They're= they are, while there= "at or in that place".
 

rodrigu3

Member
May 14, 2007
136
0
0
correcting people's grammar online? why don't you just apply for an editorial position at your local newspaper and make some money while you're at it
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Ballashoes
I couldn't careless how people spell online. I was trying to be an egghead.

Oops, my bad, then. BTW, your post did make me laugh, so I guess you accomplished your goal.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |