9mm vs .45 caliber

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Originally posted by: pontifex

thats a .410 shotgun shell, the lowest power of shotgun shell that I know of.

I know what a .410 is, but even the box-o-truth guy was surprised by the amount of recoil.

Originally posted by: Fayd

a 1shot end to a conflict is a stupid ideal to hope for.

A 3" 12ga slug would be a good start.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,971
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: pontifex

thats a .410 shotgun shell, the lowest power of shotgun shell that I know of.

I know what a .410 is, but even the box-o-truth guy was surprised by the amount of recoil.

Originally posted by: Fayd

a 1shot end to a conflict is a stupid ideal to hope for.

A 3" 12ga slug would be a good start.

a shotgun capable of firing a 12ga magnum shell while keeping recoil manageable isnt exactly small.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: pontifex

thats a .410 shotgun shell, the lowest power of shotgun shell that I know of.

I know what a .410 is, but even the box-o-truth guy was surprised by the amount of recoil.

Originally posted by: Fayd

a 1shot end to a conflict is a stupid ideal to hope for.

A 3" 12ga slug would be a good start.

a shotgun capable of firing a 12ga magnum shell while keeping recoil manageable isnt exactly small.

Nope, but if you want a one-shot stop, that's one of the better bets out there.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
Originally posted by: gorobei
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: gorobei
Originally posted by: Triumph
Instant incapacitation is caused by severing the nervous system. People's opinions are swayed by the movies, they think a 45ACP will throw someone through a plate glass window while a 9mm will bounce off of their jacket. It's all bullshit. People are just like zombies, aim for the brain and they'll go down.

uh, no.
bullets don't sever nervous systems. the kinetic energy of the round hitting tissue and transferring that energy to the surrounding tissue creates an overpressure wave in the tissue which triggers a massive response in the pain receptors. the massive and simultaneous input overloads the brain causing the "instant" incapacitation. it is a temporary effect that can be affected by sympathetic nervous response/compensation.

Ok thanks for that confusingly worded method of saying, "a bullet pressure wave needs to sever the central nervous system connection for guaranteed instant incapacitation." So aim for the head or neck, and either the bullet severs the spine, or the pressure wave severs the spine.

The FBI report also emphasizes that unless the bullet destroys or damages the central nervous system (i.e., brain or upper spinal cord), incapacitation of the subject can take a long time, seemingly longer if one is engaged in a firefight.

Failing a hit to the central nervous system, massive bleeding from holes in the heart or major blood vessels of the torso, causing circulatory collapse is the only other way to force incapacitation upon an adversary, and this takes time. For example, there is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10-15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed. (3)

More often than not, an officer firing at a suspect will not immediately know if he or she has even struck the target. The physics are such that the body will rarely involuntarily move or jerk, and usually there is no noticeable spewing of blood or surface tearing of tissue. Often there is no blood whatsoever. (4)

So much for instant incapacitation via "pain."

http://www.policeone.com/patro...ndgun-knockdown-power/

um. still no.
you need to work on your reading comprehension.

Nothing is being severed, certainly not the nerves or spinal column. The one shot stops I'm referring to are instances where one or two rounds of a "performance" JHP is fired and the target is sufficiently traumatized that they cease to be able to do whatever it was that made them a threat in a reasonable amount of time. (this is the general criteria of most departments when it comes to choosing a duty round.)
The current generation of JHP (hydrashok, corbon, rangerSXT, golden sabre, starfire, what have you) are all designed to expand and cavitate to transfer all the KE to the tissues of the organs in center mass. They all seek to over stimulate the pain receptors in those tissues to overload the brain and cause "blackout" or incapacitation. These designs are intended to avoid relying on hitting those special "magic" targets in the body that cause the perp to drop instantly (ie the spinal cord, brain, carotid, or aorta) due to instant death. Rather they are trying to incapacitate by relying on the overpressure effect on the brain. They merely need to hit the tissues in center mass (the largest and easiest to hit part of a human silhouette). They are not seeking to cut any particular nerve.

the article you link to is an editorial where a long beach PD detective criticizes the the FBI report you quoted for its lack of reliability/practicality and asks for better research into the effectiveness of defensive rounds punctuated by an anecdote about him using a .45 long colt back in the '80s and taking 5 rounds to drop a perp.

my response to your post was to correct the mis-information of your "sever the nervous system" statement. I and certainly no one else cares about the mechanism of how a headshot stops a perp.
Headshots are typically unreliable and low percentage in terms of being able to make. There's a reason why the mozambique drill is two to the chest and one headtap.

You're rambling so much that I really don't know what you're point is anymore. First of all, the article I linked is not a detective criticizing the FBI report. He's using it to support his position. Where the hell is your reading comprehension? Did you even look at my link?

Let me clarify my original post: The only way to reliably cause instant incapacitation 100% of the time is to sever the central nervous system. That's really all there is to it. I thought the "reliably" and "100% of the time" parts were implied, I guess not.
 

fstime

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2004
4,384
5
81
Headshot stats are irrelevant, any type of law enforcement officer is trained to aim for the central body mass, aka, the chest/torso. Much harder to be accurate when aiming for someones head and you don't have the time to be prefect in an emergency.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Headshot stats are irrelevant, any type of law enforcement officer is trained to aim for the central body mass, aka, the chest/torso. Much harder to be accurate when aiming for someones head and you don't have the time to be prefect in an emergency.

Not sure how that makes them "irrelevant." I'm not advocating only aiming for the head, my original post was meant to point out the fact that if you aim for center of mass, 1. don't be surprised if the guy doesn't fly backwards through a window, 2. don't be surprised if the perpetrator doesn't immediately drop to the ground, and 3. a 45ACP is not going to do either of the above with much more reliability than a 9mm. No one is arguing that a 9mm JHP does as much damage as a 45 JHP. But no one can guarantee that the 45 would've worked when a 9mm doesn't.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,100
38,662
136
Humans are not jugs of water.


Well thanks Einstein, cleared that up for me. Was starting to wonder why water jug committed crime was so low in these parts.
I used the example I did as it's simply a cheap, more plentiful (certainly dynamic) target material than real ballistics gel or clay. Why the chip on the shoulder?


And first you recommend slow, heavy bullets but you go on to recommend the Glaser slugs which are high-velocity, lightweight bullets, which is it?

If I recall, what I recommended was to try both and see what works best for that user. I also provided some info on why the .45ACP is better at stopping threats based on it's physical characteristics and velocity. The reason I recommended the Blue Dots is because I was specifically referring to Home Security, and in this respect the Dots shine regardless of caliber used. For the record, I was speaking more about the 9mm Springer I have for my wife, and not as a load I keep for my favorite 1911. Anyway, long story short the Dots are loaded with shot but don't go anywhere until contact, whereby a tremendous cavity is created by the pre-fragmented round. The immediate loss of vascular pressure within the body (not to mention to shock itself) makes the perp go limp. The added benefit of the round is that it's made not to travel into other rooms and kill your family. Same principle as Air Marshals using frangible rounds inside a pressurized aluminum hull. Hope that clears it up.


If drywall can stop them, a couple layers of denim will seriously ameliorate the impact against humans. Not only that, but they tend not to have enough recoil to reliably cycle semiautomatic firearms.

Maybe your personal opinion of them would change if you tried them yourself at an outdoor range with the targets of your choice. I don't agree with your position at all concerning the wonderfully protective benefits of denim towards objects moving around in the 1500fps+ neighborhood. Likewise, I myself am unable to corroborate the feed issue you mentioned. My wife's 9mm has gone through about $300 worth of Blue Dots and we haven't seen a single fault. Next time I go out with the Blues I'll take some old pairs of jeans with me and drape them across some cheap meat. I need to see this ameliorating for myself.







 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Bullets are like medicine. Sometimes they just take a little while to work, no matter how big or how many shots you put on target. There is NO magical "make it dead" that you can easily carry around.

I like 9mm. Less recoil, faster follow up shots, more capacity, cheaper ammo to train with. Some like .40 or .45, thats fine too. Being competent in your weapon will do more for you then carrying a bigger gun.

Heres an example of a guy who was shot 22 times with a .40 and 17 of those were center mass. He wasnt tweaked out on meth, he wasnt smoking crack. He had a small amount of alcohol in his system and that was it.


Article

Remarkably, Palmer had taken 22 hits from Soulis' .40-caliber Glock, 17 of which had hit center mass. Despite the fact that the weapon had been loaded with Ranger SXTs?considered by many to be one of the best man-stoppers available?Palmer lived for more than four minutes after the last shot was fired. His autopsy revealed nothing more than a small amount of alcohol in his bloodstream.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |