9mm vs .45 caliber

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: yh125d


Of course, for defense I'd prefer my Python over just about anything
Beautiful gun to bad they stopped making it I have become revolver man myself because of outdoor lifestyle I lead...I have both a p220 and g19 and both have jammed up one way or another before. No thanks I want 100% though mud or snow shooting. What's funny is I didn't get a revolver until about 2 years ago and now absolutely love it!! I bought the super cheap tracker 44mag just for a field gun not wanting to get my expensive european semi-autos rusted out. For me it became just the perfect gun. I can treat it like shit drop it in mud and whip it off never really cleaning it. Powerful enough for all game. Lighter and ergonomics much better than straight handle autos. I can even carry concealed. Plus it's most accurate pistol I've ever shot. I can hit milk jugs at 100 yrds with irons all day..well maybe not all day fucker 'kicks' like a mule after about 20 shots.

Edit: What is the 44 Python variant called. I want to see if I pick pick a used one up at gun broker or something while the getting is good Never know what Obama will do.
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
I've toyed with the idea of carrying a 357 revolver just from the ease of cleaning and safety from malfunction. A misfire on a auto pistol would ruin your day. On a revolver you just pull the trigger again. I lean to the 357 because I could get lots of trigger time with it using .38 and keep nice 357 hollow point's in it while I'm wearing it.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: sourceninja
I've toyed with the idea of carrying a 357 revolver just from the ease of cleaning and safety from malfunction. A misfire on a auto pistol would ruin your day. On a revolver you just pull the trigger again. I lean to the 357 because I could get lots of trigger time with it using .38 and keep nice 357 hollow point's in it while I'm wearing it.

I chose the 44 magnum because i think it's even more versatile than the 357 as a field gun. You can purchase or load some plinking 210-240 gr personal-defense ammo that resembles good loads in the 45ACP range @ ~500ftlbs or , if you want to get serious and kill some moose or bears, go all the up to 340 gr Buffalo Bore w/ ~1650 ft lbs of energy and everything in between with hundreds of bullet designs which of course all chamber and feed.

I'm pretty much at the point if I could only have one gun the 44 mag is it. OTOH if I had to have only one dedicated CCW revolver I'd prolly go 357 because of mass and size.
 

EricMartello

Senior member
Apr 17, 2003
910
0
0
Originally posted by: JLee
Uh, no. Unless by "general direction" you mean "pointed at the target." In your typical indoors engagement distance, you're not going to have significant spread out of a shotgun.

I like how you take the time to counter an arbitrary statement with another arbitrary statement, yet manage to be wrong. It takes skill to be arbitrary and incorrect at the same time.

By general direction, obviously it means pointed at the target without consideration for precise aiming...i.e. what most people would be doing in that kind of situation. I don't know what you'd be doing.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Originally posted by: EricMartello
Originally posted by: JLee
Uh, no. Unless by "general direction" you mean "pointed at the target." In your typical indoors engagement distance, you're not going to have significant spread out of a shotgun.

I like how you take the time to counter an arbitrary statement with another arbitrary statement, yet manage to be wrong. It takes skill to be arbitrary and incorrect at the same time.

By general direction, obviously it means pointed at the target without consideration for precise aiming...i.e. what most people would be doing in that kind of situation. I don't know what you'd be doing.

No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.
 

EricMartello

Senior member
Apr 17, 2003
910
0
0
Originally posted by: JLee
No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.

My point is that with a shot gun you have a better chance of hitting a target when you are all psyched out from the mental stress of the situation...even cops and soldiers who have been in real firefights feel this stress, which is why soldiers go thru what many would say is brutal training.
 

Christobevii3

Senior member
Aug 29, 2004
995
0
76
FMJ 9mm yes sucks, it penetrates like crazy. 9mm JHP, is as good as 40 and almost as good as 45. Take 9mm any day.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: EricMartello
Originally posted by: JLee
No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.

My point is that with a shot gun you have a better chance of hitting a target when you are all psyched out from the mental stress of the situation...

Can you offer any evidence of this?
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Originally posted by: EricMartello
Originally posted by: JLee
No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.

My point is that with a shot gun you have a better chance of hitting a target when you are all psyched out from the mental stress of the situation...even cops and soldiers who have been in real firefights feel this stress, which is why soldiers go thru what many would say is brutal training.

A big plus with the shotgun is that since you're sending a lot more mass downrange, any hit will have more impact than a handgun round placed in the same location..I'm not convinced that aim is any less important, though.

*Googles*

Text- looks like average spread is 1" per yard of distance...so at 5yd, you have a 5" spread. TBH, that's more than I thought- our shotguns are less-lethal, and AR15s don't spread...so I'm not as familiar as I could be.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: EricMartello
Originally posted by: JLee
No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.

My point is that with a shot gun you have a better chance of hitting a target when you are all psyched out from the mental stress of the situation...

Can you offer any evidence of this?

1" spread per yard...at 15ft distance, you'd have a 3" spread. That's enough to give you a couple pellets on target that may have been a miss with a handgun, but IMHO it's not significant enough to make much of a difference. If we're talking outdoors, or if you live in a warehouse, that's another story.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: EricMartello
Originally posted by: JLee
No offense intended, but the way your statement was phrased implied, to me, that you can just point "that way" and be done with it.

FWIW, I'd be shooting center mass.

My point is that with a shot gun you have a better chance of hitting a target when you are all psyched out from the mental stress of the situation...

Can you offer any evidence of this?

1" spread per yard...at 15ft distance, you'd have a 3" spread. That's enough to give you a couple pellets on target that may have been a miss with a handgun, but IMHO it's not significant enough to make much of a difference. If we're talking outdoors, or if you live in a warehouse, that's another story.
[/quote]

Were any of those tests conducted under duress?

My point is that the average person may be able to more reliably hit a target with a shotgun but nobody is an average person. It's completely individual and the only advice being given out should be, "Try both and use whichever you're better at."
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Duress has absolutely no bearing on the shot pattern from the shotgun. Are you arguing the average shooter's proficiency with a long gun vs a handgun?
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,971
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: Kroze
A lot of people laugh at the fact that a 9mm is a joke and you'll need to put 20 rounds into someone before they'll "feel" anything or drop to the ground due to adrenaline.

a lot of people are stupid, and with 1 round you'll "feel" a LOT.

the advantage of .45 is larger bullet, higher KE, less penetration. thus, more solid transfer of KE from bullet to target, increasing the likelyness of knocking the target down.

this is somewhat mitigated using JHP's, which fan out and do a good job of transferring KE. (and as an added bonus, take out a lot of flesh in the process)

you can use JHP's for both.

imo, if you can handle the recoil of the .45, go for it.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,971
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
A well placed .22 is far better than a poorly placed .45 or 9.

a homeowner under attack may not have time to place his shots in ideal locations. better to get something that will have some effect regardless of where it hits...even if it's only to slow the target down for the follow up shots.

that's why the taurus judge looks cool. load first round with .410, all subsequent with .45 long colt. the first round slows him down, the following 4 make sure he stops moving.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
A well placed .22 is far better than a poorly placed .45 or 9.

a homeowner under attack may not have time to place his shots in ideal locations. better to get something that will have some effect regardless of where it hits...even if it's only to slow the target down for the follow up shots.

that's why the taurus judge looks cool. load first round with .410, all subsequent with .45 long colt. the first round slows him down, the following 4 make sure he stops moving.

If you're still holding onto it after the .410 goes off, anyway. :Q
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: JLee
Duress has absolutely no bearing on the shot pattern from the shotgun. Are you arguing the average shooter's proficiency with a long gun vs a handgun?

My point is that what works for one person might not work for another. Recommending a shotgun to someone because of the spread of the shot at X number of feet is silly if the person can put all eight rounds from a 1911 into a 1" circle at 15 feet but can't shoulder a shotgun because of short arms. I was originally addressing what EricMartello posted. I agree with everything you've posted so far.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
Originally posted by: gorobei
Originally posted by: Triumph
Instant incapacitation is caused by severing the nervous system. People's opinions are swayed by the movies, they think a 45ACP will throw someone through a plate glass window while a 9mm will bounce off of their jacket. It's all bullshit. People are just like zombies, aim for the brain and they'll go down.

uh, no.
bullets don't sever nervous systems. the kinetic energy of the round hitting tissue and transferring that energy to the surrounding tissue creates an overpressure wave in the tissue which triggers a massive response in the pain receptors. the massive and simultaneous input overloads the brain causing the "instant" incapacitation. it is a temporary effect that can be affected by sympathetic nervous response/compensation.

Ok thanks for that confusingly worded method of saying, "a bullet pressure wave needs to sever the central nervous system connection for guaranteed instant incapacitation." So aim for the head or neck, and either the bullet severs the spine, or the pressure wave severs the spine.

The FBI report also emphasizes that unless the bullet destroys or damages the central nervous system (i.e., brain or upper spinal cord), incapacitation of the subject can take a long time, seemingly longer if one is engaged in a firefight.

Failing a hit to the central nervous system, massive bleeding from holes in the heart or major blood vessels of the torso, causing circulatory collapse is the only other way to force incapacitation upon an adversary, and this takes time. For example, there is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10-15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed. (3)

More often than not, an officer firing at a suspect will not immediately know if he or she has even struck the target. The physics are such that the body will rarely involuntarily move or jerk, and usually there is no noticeable spewing of blood or surface tearing of tissue. Often there is no blood whatsoever. (4)

So much for instant incapacitation via "pain."

http://www.policeone.com/patro...ndgun-knockdown-power/

 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,806
46
91
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
A well placed .22 is far better than a poorly placed .45 or 9.

a homeowner under attack may not have time to place his shots in ideal locations. better to get something that will have some effect regardless of where it hits...even if it's only to slow the target down for the follow up shots.

that's why the taurus judge looks cool. load first round with .410, all subsequent with .45 long colt. the first round slows him down, the following 4 make sure he stops moving.

If you're still holding onto it after the .410 goes off, anyway. :Q

thats a .410 shotgun shell, the lowest power of shotgun shell that I know of.
 

LinuxIdiot

Golden Member
May 20, 2002
1,209
0
0
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: marvdmartian
I remember when I lived on Guam, there was a fella that went to prison for murder. Seems he was involved in a drug deal gone bad, where he and the victim got into a fight. He beat the shit out of the other guy, then decided he needed to die.......so he pulled out his 9mm, and emptied a 17-round magazine in the other guy.......then decided he needed to die MORE, so walked over to his vehicle, changed to his spare magazine, came back over and unloaded the whole thing in this guy's carcass!! :shocked:

Yeah........let's see someone put thirty four .45 sized holes in someone with just two magazines!!! :laugh:

http://www.midwayusa.com/eprod...duct?saleitemid=564303


Personally, I have winchester ranger 124gr +p in my kahr pm9. Maybe I am a girl, but I can't control the 45 as well. I miss my sig p229 .40, but I decided to consolidate calibers, so now I only have to buy 22, 9mm, 12ga and 308. With cheaper prices, I can practice more often (indoor target practice as well as action pistol). I just can't afford 45 prices like my buddies with their 1911's.

Next to the bed, when I go to sleep, #1 buckshot.


Eh I would rather have this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cthhnAoZ1GU

 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,713
1,067
136
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: gorobei
Originally posted by: Triumph
Instant incapacitation is caused by severing the nervous system. People's opinions are swayed by the movies, they think a 45ACP will throw someone through a plate glass window while a 9mm will bounce off of their jacket. It's all bullshit. People are just like zombies, aim for the brain and they'll go down.

uh, no.
bullets don't sever nervous systems. the kinetic energy of the round hitting tissue and transferring that energy to the surrounding tissue creates an overpressure wave in the tissue which triggers a massive response in the pain receptors. the massive and simultaneous input overloads the brain causing the "instant" incapacitation. it is a temporary effect that can be affected by sympathetic nervous response/compensation.

Ok thanks for that confusingly worded method of saying, "a bullet pressure wave needs to sever the central nervous system connection for guaranteed instant incapacitation." So aim for the head or neck, and either the bullet severs the spine, or the pressure wave severs the spine.

The FBI report also emphasizes that unless the bullet destroys or damages the central nervous system (i.e., brain or upper spinal cord), incapacitation of the subject can take a long time, seemingly longer if one is engaged in a firefight.

Failing a hit to the central nervous system, massive bleeding from holes in the heart or major blood vessels of the torso, causing circulatory collapse is the only other way to force incapacitation upon an adversary, and this takes time. For example, there is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10-15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed. (3)

More often than not, an officer firing at a suspect will not immediately know if he or she has even struck the target. The physics are such that the body will rarely involuntarily move or jerk, and usually there is no noticeable spewing of blood or surface tearing of tissue. Often there is no blood whatsoever. (4)

So much for instant incapacitation via "pain."

http://www.policeone.com/patro...ndgun-knockdown-power/

um. still no.
you need to work on your reading comprehension.

Nothing is being severed, certainly not the nerves or spinal column. The one shot stops I'm referring to are instances where one or two rounds of a "performance" JHP is fired and the target is sufficiently traumatized that they cease to be able to do whatever it was that made them a threat in a reasonable amount of time. (this is the general criteria of most departments when it comes to choosing a duty round.)
The current generation of JHP (hydrashok, corbon, rangerSXT, golden sabre, starfire, what have you) are all designed to expand and cavitate to transfer all the KE to the tissues of the organs in center mass. They all seek to over stimulate the pain receptors in those tissues to overload the brain and cause "blackout" or incapacitation. These designs are intended to avoid relying on hitting those special "magic" targets in the body that cause the perp to drop instantly (ie the spinal cord, brain, carotid, or aorta) due to instant death. Rather they are trying to incapacitate by relying on the overpressure effect on the brain. They merely need to hit the tissues in center mass (the largest and easiest to hit part of a human silhouette). They are not seeking to cut any particular nerve.

the article you link to is an editorial where a long beach PD detective criticizes the the FBI report you quoted for its lack of reliability/practicality and asks for better research into the effectiveness of defensive rounds punctuated by an anecdote about him using a .45 long colt back in the '80s and taking 5 rounds to drop a perp.

my response to your post was to correct the mis-information of your "sever the nervous system" statement. I and certainly no one else cares about the mechanism of how a headshot stops a perp.
Headshots are typically unreliable and low percentage in terms of being able to make. There's a reason why the mozambique drill is two to the chest and one headtap.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,971
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
A .410 is really not suited to personal defense. Even loaded with a slug or buckshot, it's pretty ineffective compared to a decent pistol round.

http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot41.htm

their testing methodology leaves a lot to be desired.

if you think .410 wont have an effect, you're retarded. it will have an effect. it'll have precisely the effect i described. SLOWING down the opponent.

a 1shot end to a conflict is a stupid ideal to hope for.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |