Yes. It is relevant in every interaction. With the legal system it is relevant and has huge impact. In this case triply is a measurement of magnitude, not frequency. Thanks for playing at pedantry though!
So, triply(?) always relevant, then?
I'm not a lawyer but I don't think it's a given that pleading guilty to a felony must be ignored if the plea deal is not accepted. We'll see when our resident lawyers weigh in. I suspect that DVC at least is very well versed on this very issue. Don't remember Woolfe's background.False. Per the article, a judge determined that the new charge constituted a probation violation even though he had yet to be convicted of it. When he was found not guilty, that order should have been vacated yet was not.
Catch-22, Southern style.
The Alford plea is immaterial because it was denied.
There needs to be honest and real repercussions for incidents like this, where a piece of evidence that could completely clear someone is kept off the record/out of the courtroom in order to 'win' a case. That isn't justice.Bump...here's another example of an innocent man convicted of a murder he did not commit...prosecutors hid the fact that he was 640 miles away from the crime scene...when the defense reopened the case and defendent found innocent, prosecutors REFUSED to allow him free (WTF) and offered an "Alford Plea" to save their own skins.
https://www.propublica.org/article/alford-pleas-fred-steese-conviction-without-admitting-guilt
Difficulty: No racism here (both victim and defendant were poor white gay folk though, so same miscarriage of justice rules apply!!)
Because getting your hand cut off for a crime you did not commit is better then getting your head cut off for the same crime you did not commit. The more you resist the "MAN" the harsher the penalty. Fresh to the world are you?Wait, but why did he plead guilty to assault? That part makes no sense.
Difficulty: No racism here (both victim and defendant were poor white gay folk though, so same miscarriage of justice rules apply!!)
s no sense.
There needs to be honest and real repercussions for incidents like this, where a piece of evidence that could completely clear someone is kept off the record/out of the courtroom in order to 'win' a case. That isn't justice.
Lawyers in general are scum of the earth type people - do you really think scum is truly going to setup a system that polices co-scum, and actually have that system work* in the manner it should rather in the manner that benefits them the most?
*: work as in actually work full time, not "work" as in appear to work only when minimally convenient/necessary.
What happens in these cases is poor defendants are provided overworked public defenders, ie not enough lawyer, mostly because scum of the earth (ie you & pals) don't see egalitarian justice to be in their self-interest.
Shouldn't be a problem, that Big Gov you all like would never setup a self-sustaining system for itself, would it? Embrace your ideology Fail!
Typical degenerate who can't take any responsibility for his peers shunning taxes to pay for more public defenders. I mean, you consistently admit that every problem with the system is basically you.
Well, I'm in IL...which means before you even posted that you were wrong. LOL, be honest Failbot, have you actually been right about anything here?
No, it's perfectly correct that you & all the other degenerates are the root of basically every problem with modern western society.
Well, I'm in IL...which means before you even posted that you were wrong. LOL, be honest Failbot, have you actually been right about anything here?
You're Fails peer?
Look up apostrophe use while you're at it.
Also generally even most righties can manage to make their idiotic insulting nicknames for people have some reference to the name of the person. How is it that you fail at that most basic task?
No I mean how can anyone believe the whole story when the guy wanted to plead guilty to assault? You don't plead guilty to assault unless you're guilty of something from what I can tell in this case. Doesn't look like we have the full story (which makes sense, since it's not legal to sentence someone to years in prison if found not guilty).
Sorry, I intentionally leave those out, or put them in, to annoy grammar nazis. You asked me to look up peer though for some reason. Without knowing the reason I took a guess that You are Fails peer? You are is You're isn't it? I don't know man, I'm just a product of ma envirahments!
I'm not sure if you've (did I get that one right?) read much AgentFail, or, Fail for short, but it's a pretty safe statement to make that his/her/it (some of us are not convinced it's not an entertaining bot) posts are just...fail. Other than some very indoctrinated Lefties here, I'm not sure I've seen any one poster (alt, bot, or otherwise) fail so consistently. Sorry, not alt, Mods have assured us Fail is not an alt.
Appears a great success to portray conservatives as your/svnla/roflmouth's peers. They certainly aren't going to disparage their own in lieu of trying to discredit western liberalism all day, just like you.
Really two things make up your (did I get that one right xthetenth?) continued Fail:
1.) You're insistence of some accomplishment of some kind of goal/success story/whatever that, not strangely, only you are visualizing much less proclaiming. That you keep bringing up your delusion as if it's an accomplishment of some grand goal is especially entertaining...
2.) Tied into #1 above, that you think anyone would need to "disparage their own", is, also quite entertaining.
Others may have you on ignore, but honestly, I think you're my favorite crazy here in P&N right now - whoever/whatever you are. If you're a bot as some suspect, I salute your (correct use again?) creator/maintainer, it's a really good representation of a scarred by Billy Bob Lefty. Post on AgentFail, post on...
Let's not pretend there's any great mystery why I'm far and away the most despised person here by all your peers.
In order to be despised, you would have to elicit something other than pity. HTH
In order to be despised, you would have to elicit something other than pity. HTH
I'm sure your degen peers love it when it's made plainly obvious why they'd agree with you on this and just about everything.
Conservatives sure do identify with wannabe strong types, trump/chucky/you/that guy who used to brag about how alpha he was/etc.