A protest condemned in San Franciso?

[shrumpage]

I wouldn't call them a hate group - and it isn't a quote, but it is in the very first paragraph of the article.

 

[Kappo]

Another "we can do it and it's ok but if anyone else does it, it's hate speech" thread. Boooooooring. Come up with some new material people. Im getting bored and you are here to entertain me and someone picking on grammatical errors and other nitwit crap is not the way to appease your AT god.

Thank you!

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

 

[shrumpage]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

It stated that a guy that worked for city hall said they were annoying etc. a assemblymember (a glorified city hall clerk)

...not a offical commdemation, just a guys opinion while watching the event.

Granted this is a soggy thread so he probably would like to make it out that all of san francisco was getting ready to march them into a big communial pagan cooking pot to feed them to gay sex slaves after dancing naked to honor che and cast out the demons of bush.


Hmm I should contact the vast liberal conspiracy board and maybe they should release the secret plan to the public, maybe the twerps would go home

 

[shrumpage]

More than 25,000 evangelical Christian youth landed Friday in San Francisco for a two-day rally at AT&T Park against "the virtue terrorism" of popular culture, and they were greeted by an official city condemnation and a clutch of protesters who said their event amounted to a "fascist mega-pep rally."

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: shrumpage

More than 25,000 evangelical Christian youth landed Friday in San Francisco for a two-day rally at AT&T Park against "the virtue terrorism" of popular culture, and they were greeted by an official city condemnation and a clutch of protesters who said their event amounted to a "fascist mega-pep rally."

hmm, didnt say that originally, guess they officialy condemmed it, well so be it.

They hate sf and all it stands for and the city doesent like them either, problem solved.

Maybe next time they will stay in bumfvck where they dont start trouble. rumor is they called in two bomb threats becasue some homeless dudes had a suitcases laying out on market street and prancing up and down castro neighborhood shouting anti-gay slogans into a usually quiet neighborhood.

(of course if the anarchists or anti-war peeps did this unscheduled blood would flow as the suburban cops would be all over them)

 

[shrumpage]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: shrumpage

More than 25,000 evangelical Christian youth landed Friday in San Francisco for a two-day rally at AT&T Park against "the virtue terrorism" of popular culture, and they were greeted by an official city condemnation and a clutch of protesters who said their event amounted to a "fascist mega-pep rally."

hmm, didnt say that originally, guess they officialy condemmed it, well so be it.

They hate sf and all it stands for and the city doesent like them either, problem solved.

Maybe next time they will stay in bumfvck where they dont start trouble. rumor is they called in two bomb threats becasue some homeless dudes had a suitcases laying out on market street and prancing up and down castro neighborhood shouting anti-gay slogans into a usually quiet neighborhood.

(of course if anarchists or anti-war peeps did this blood would flow)

The article always said that. And the anti-war peeps did have a bunch of rallies - very recently - and blood did not flow.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: shrumpage

More than 25,000 evangelical Christian youth landed Friday in San Francisco for a two-day rally at AT&T Park against "the virtue terrorism" of popular culture, and they were greeted by an official city condemnation and a clutch of protesters who said their event amounted to a "fascist mega-pep rally."

hmm, didnt say that originally, guess they officialy condemmed it, well so be it.

They hate sf and all it stands for and the city doesent like them either, problem solved.

Maybe next time they will stay in bumfvck where they dont start trouble. rumor is they called in two bomb threats becasue some homeless dudes had a suitcases laying out on market street and prancing up and down castro neighborhood shouting anti-gay slogans into a usually quiet neighborhood.

(of course if anarchists or anti-war peeps did this blood would flow)

The article always said that. And the anti-war peeps did have a bunch of rallies - very recently - and blood did not flow.

You can counterprotest a legit action with no blowback.(they had permission to rally at city hall but not march on castro as it was getting evening and it is a working class neighborhood) And I did not see that when I read it before soggy posted it, it must have been a update, I read the gate every day.

Regardless, I should have checked again when you pointed it out so you are correct.

 

[shrumpage]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: shrumpage

More than 25,000 evangelical Christian youth landed Friday in San Francisco for a two-day rally at AT&T Park against "the virtue terrorism" of popular culture, and they were greeted by an official city condemnation and a clutch of protesters who said their event amounted to a "fascist mega-pep rally."

hmm, didnt say that originally, guess they officialy condemmed it, well so be it.

They hate sf and all it stands for and the city doesent like them either, problem solved.

Maybe next time they will stay in bumfvck where they dont start trouble. rumor is they called in two bomb threats becasue some homeless dudes had a suitcases laying out on market street and prancing up and down castro neighborhood shouting anti-gay slogans into a usually quiet neighborhood.

(of course if anarchists or anti-war peeps did this blood would flow)

The article always said that. And the anti-war peeps did have a bunch of rallies - very recently - and blood did not flow.

You can counterprotest a legit action with no blowback.(they had permission to rally at city hall but not march on castro) And I did not see that when I read it before soggy posted it, it must have been a update, I read the gate every day.

I wasn't talking about counter protests - i was talking about normal protests that were happening - some one said 10k in the same area.


I just love how you jump all over some one and call them names when they make a typo - but you can't even admit you made a mistake, when its beeen proven.

The guy was making a remark and not one on the record, it is pretty tasteless that they targeted SF to spread hate to people that never invited them in the first place.

BTW - the remark was on the record - thats why it was quoted in a newspaper!

kappo summed it up pretty good:

"its okay if i do, it but if some else does it - its bad"

 

[Steeplerot]

Settle down, obviously once again you have no sense of humor, I pointed out his typo as a joke,read and try to slow down foaming of the mouth.
The subject of anti-war demonstrations earlier in the week never even came up, those kids were not even in town yet nor even relative to the op, your the one who brought it up duh.

And yes, the actual sf chronicle is the newspaper that comes out beforehand in print then updated on their website: the sf gate. sf gate and the chronicle are one in the same company. Dont get your underwear into complicated knot.

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

Seems to be BS. A "city condemnation" would normally refer to run down property.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

Seems to be BS. A "city condemnation" would normally refer to run down property.

condemnation: an expression of strong disapproval; pronouncing as wrong or morally culpable

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

Seems to be BS. A "city condemnation" would normally refer to run down property.

condemnation: an expression of strong disapproval; pronouncing as wrong or morally culpable

Right, but is there an official one of those? There is a "city condemnation" of property.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: shrumpage
People do complain about groups and gatherings all the time, what makes this different is the city offically condemned the group. Could you imagine the fall out if a city offically condemned a group of muslims, homosexuals, PETA or any other group?

The city didn't officially do any such thing.

It is stated in the very first paragraph of the article.

Seems to be BS. A "city condemnation" would normally refer to run down property.

condemnation: an expression of strong disapproval; pronouncing as wrong or morally culpable

Right, but is there an official one of those? There is a "city condemnation" of property.

I am sure that a city government PR agent of some sort can issue one on a certain subject, sometimes even call a vote. I know SF and maybe portland has called a official vote for condemnation of the iraq war for example. (not the tearing a building down one -its something different)

It doesent really mean anything but that the powers that be do not see whatever it is as positive and strong disapproves it. It's just a way of grandstanding about a subject really.

 

[Starbuck1975]

It doesent really mean anything but that the powers that be do not see whatever it is as positive and strong disapproves it. It's just a way of grandstanding about a subject really.

Would you feel the same way if a Bible belt or NeoCon stronghold town or city issued a similar condemnation againt an anti-war protest?

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: Starbuck1975

It doesent really mean anything but that the powers that be do not see whatever it is as positive and strong disapproves it. It's just a way of grandstanding about a subject really.

Would you feel the same way if a Bible belt or NeoCon stronghold town or city issued a similar condemnation againt an anti-war protest?

If it reflects the opinion of their city then why not, they are not stopping anyone just expressing their view.