Maybe I should follow suit.
Roflmouth just trying to troll as usual along racial lines.
The ignore function makes post like this very very confusing. Just seems so random now. I like it.
Hey racist retard, who are you talking about? Certainly not the left because they're rich enough to afford it. You must be talking about hillbilly inbreds like yourselfs.
i find it interesting that a lot of Dems are so worried about possible Russian influence on the elections but not on possible election fraud from within the country. Both should be looked into.
Love it.
"........ provide the commission with all publicly available voter roll data"
That bastard! Is he actually gathering publicly available data! Is he actually going to look into voter fraud !! We can't have that happening!
The difference is, there is direct evidence of Russian interference. The IC has told us this with a high degree of certainty. The evidence for widespread voter fraud is non-existent. Generally you need something to go on before you can justify using government resources to investigate something. We could also have a commission on getting to the bottom of that alien autopsy in hangar 51, but somehow I doubt it's a wise use of tax payer money.
Also, you can see why there is no trust here, right? The POTUS who started this so-called investigation has alleged widespread voter fraud without evidence, and we know he is egomaniacally obsessed with disproving the notion that he lost the popular vote. And we know he has appointed someone to lead it who has a history of making baseless claims of voter fraud without evidence to back them up. Trump chose him for a reason.
Even IF there is a good reason to investigate it, there is no reason to trust a single thing that comes out of Trump's investigation. Trump is not impartial on the matter and has no interest in getting at the truth.
*last 4 if your social not the full number to my knowledge
But the committee hasn't given a good answer why they need it or what it's for other than investigating "stuff" about voter fraud and "stuff"
The intelligence community also said that there is no evidence that the Russians were able to change any votes. That came out recently in the hearing with AG Sessions. Also, the NYT two days ago had to retract an article that falsely stated that 17 intelligence agencies had confirmed Russian influence on the elections. There is no public evidence for it.
Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
i find it interesting that a lot of Dems are so worried about possible Russian influence on the elections but not on possible election fraud from within the country. Both should be looked into.
The evidence of Russian involvement is mountainous.
The difference is, there is direct evidence of Russian interference. The IC has told us this with a high degree of certainty.
The intelligence community also said that there is no evidence that the Russians were able to change any votes. That came out recently in the hearing with AG Sessions. Also, the NYT two days ago had to retract an article that falsely stated that 17 intelligence agencies had confirmed Russian influence on the elections. There is no public evidence for it.
With regards to looking into possible election fraud... why not set up a group of trusted Ds and Rs... and have them look into it? i don't see why the President couldn't do it... and keep it at an arm's length. If it hasn't seriously been looked into before... then how is anyone to know what the extent of the fraud may be... it may be more serious than anyone thought. It certainly cannot hurt.
I'm regretting turning Buckshit back on, but it was quite confusing when he made his return debut.The ignore function makes post like this very very confusing. Just seems so random now. I like it.
The intelligence community also said that there is no evidence that the Russians were able to change any votes. That came out recently in the hearing with AG Sessions. Also, the NYT two days ago had to retract an article that falsely stated that 17 intelligence agencies had confirmed Russian influence on the elections. There is no public evidence for it.
With regards to looking into possible election fraud... why not set up a group of trusted Ds and Rs... and have them look into it? i don't see why the President couldn't do it... and keep it at an arm's length. If it hasn't seriously been looked into before... then how is anyone to know what the extent of the fraud may be... it may be more serious than anyone thought. It certainly cannot hurt.
pffft, like he doesn't have it alreadyThey'll be passing your information right along to Putin.
You don't have to change any votes to unfairly influence an election. There is evidence that the Russkies hacked into the computers that control voter lists in Democratic strongholds. Scramble those lists even a little and you have chaos on election day. Dem areas can't vote while GOP areas unaffected. The studies into exactly what the Russians did are still ongoing despite many GOP Congress critters doing their best to block it, saying nothing there.
OTOH voter fraud was a top priority of the Justice Dept throughout the GWB years, and many GOP dominated states have rushed through draconian laws meant to prevent such fraud. Meanwhile in the decades that have passed next to no cases of actual voter fraud have been proven. Look at SC-have to have a driver's license or official ID to vote, can get official ID for free at DMV. When the court challenge is over the state all of a sudden shuts down all the DMV branches in black areas "for budgetary reasons."
why is that data being archived in the first place? who or what I vote for is nobodys business and should never be kept for data mining.