Because, true to Orwell's words, the argument for those wishing to inflict govt violence on others, and who actually have the power to do so, is that they are doing so in self-defense and out of necessity. They gotta do unto lest they be done unto.And yet the argument continues.
If you don't have a video of wiping ur ass I can assume you walk around with shit in ur pants right? Guess its true since you don't have a video of your own experience.How about you link some of it up for us to see. I want to see your proof.
My personal fav is when Prosperity Gospel folks on their 3rd marriages cite Matthew 19:4-6.Well, there are those passages in Leviticus...
So, you got nothing to back up your claims but your stupidity, thanks for your contribution of nothing relevant.If you don't have a video of wiping ur ass I can assume you walk around with shit in ur pants right? Guess its true since you don't have a video of your own experience.
I know that I am often willing to accept a rational argument in lieu of evidence, but he just want us to believe him because he says so, and call us names when we don't.So, you got nothing to back up your claims but your stupidity, thanks for your contribution of nothing relevant.
He could at least humor us with some "ANTIFA and Me" fanfic but I guess that's too much effort.I know that I am often willing to accept a rational argument in lieu of evidence, but he just want us to believe him because he says so, and call us names when we don't.
Well, if we're going to get our hits in before we cease with the off-topic stuff, I may as well do mine.
Of course it's a windy road for conservatives. That's how the road looks when you don't have all the answers; when you have principles and fail to meet them, and can only do as best you can. Progressives, by contrast, have the same answers for everything because there are no principles, only the pursuit of power. That's what's so sad about blacks and gays and (soon) transgenders. They're just pawns in the chess game, to be sacrificed when necessary to the agenda. Blacks wallow in poverty in cities overwhelmingly controlled by democrats. No one cares about their conditions until they blow up and present a political opportunity as they do now. That's why it's no surprise to me that you said earlier, "Let's keep the protests going until the election."
What does this response have to do with what I posted?
I'll say it as simply as I can for you.
I disagree with your interpretation of his words and intentions.
so what you're saying is that you disagree with the accepted definitions of words.
I'll say it as simply as I can for you.
I disagree with your interpretation of his words and intentions.
Extraordinary rendition, water boarding, the usual.So tell us what he really meant. Hunt Antifas down like middle eastern terrorists... and then what?
Here we go again. Not at all.
He said nothing about killing anyone.
I'll say it as simply as I can for you.
I disagree with your interpretation of his words and intentions.
So tell us what he really meant. Hunt Antifas down like middle eastern terrorists... and then what?
I guess "hunting" means something else to you than it does to every other human that has practiced it for more than 200,000+ years. Also, I guess "hunt them down like we do in the middle east," which is exactly what he said, was never meant to suggest anything, because he didn't specifically say the word "kill."
You guys are so precious: you demand literal evaluation, with no room for context or nuance, or advanced, adult level critical thinking when established, thoroughly-practiced dogwhistles are dogwhistling to you as they always have; but then whenever someone like Trump uses literal, 3rd grade language to expose the strange thoughts in his brain, we must accept that what he literally said isn't what he literally meant, because now we don't understand the "subtle brilliance of his thinking."
fuck off, goobers. No one is fooled by your vain, practiced stupidity.
Again, look at my post and tell me specifically where we differ. I don't think you really read it if you came to the conclusion that I was saying his words meant he really wanted to kill people.
Shoot them. We shoot terrorists in the Middle East. That's what America does. America shoots terrorists in the Middle East.Hunt them down and bring them to justice as they are nothing but criminals.
Hunt them down and bring them to justice as they are nothing but criminals.
First you say the issue is what he did not say.
Then he has a clear pattern of "overtly partisan pro-Trump rhetoric with zero accountability.
He intended to invoke an image of hunting and killing looters to inflame...
Please speak out against that. What makes it appear your covert mission is to support his activities are
1. your lack of condemnation for Gaetz.
2. your repetition of his phrasing. His words are not ok even if an interpretation of them in a vacuum exists which otherwise would be.
I have no idea what you Wanted him to say.
Yes he is as partisan as are many politicians Pelosi, Shumer, McConnell, and many others come freely to mind.
He intended to invoke an image of hunting and killing looters. I disagree.
Looters and rioters need to be hunted down and brought to justice. If that stirs up unrest sorry about that. Looters and rioters have no place anywhere and are nothing but criminals. I have no "Covert Mission" I openly support the criminal prosecution of looters and rioters.
You don't like his words. Fine that is your option. I don't need to condemn Gaetz for his words that you don't like or agree with.
Shoot them. We shoot terrorists in the Middle East. That's what America does. America shoots terrorists in the Middle East.
Gaetz wants American law enforcement and military members to shoot American citizens, the same way we shoot terrorists in the Middle East. There's no secret fucking decoder ring for this pcgeek. He wants American citizens to die.
lol, it's like you refuse to admit what you very well know is done when "terrorists in the middle east are hunted down."
this is why no one respects you. You know exactly what he means, you just dare not admit it because you feel that you "are being attacked."
Hell, even Atreus tapped out on the "no contest" with that one. It's plainly obvious that there is but one interpretation. but you are living up to your avatar again.
The issue is what you did not say.
And Gaetz has never said or done anything asinine before right?You guys are free to "interpret" and read into the meaning anyway you like I suppose. I do not for an instant think that he meant for the United States to hunt down and kill looters and rioters without due process. That is asinine.
Yes. That's what we're saying. Matthew Gaetz is fucking asinine.You guys are free to "interpret" and read into the meaning anyway you like I suppose. I do not for an instant think that he meant for the United States to hunt down and kill looters and rioters without due process. That is asinine.