Originally posted by: conjur
More of your inaccuracies.Originally posted by: ntdz
You have no idea do you...I don't ignore anti-Bush stuff at all, just because you say ****** like that doesn't mean it's true.Originally posted by: conjur
That's just it, you don't interpret the news. You ignore anything that isn't pro-Bush. If you don't ignore it, you slam it, smear it, deface it, piss on it, sh*t on it, and try and break it in half. That's interpreting?Originally posted by: ntdz
What, people aren't allowed to have different opinions than you? Everyone has to interpret every news event the in the exact same way? Come on, give me a break here...Originally posted by: conjur
Sure you don't. Although, I must imagine the news at the BBC and from whatever other sources via Google are most often ignored by you. Your posts prove that.
Besides, what do you think YOU do? You ignore anything positive going on in the country, which is evidenced by the countless economic threads you go into and try to discredit.
I don't try and discredit anything. I merely point out the reality of a situation whenever you and that fluffer, zendari, post the first bit of positive economic news. One report <> a robust economy.
And, that economic news is a prime example of how you ignore anything that doesn't put a positive spin on the economy. I've posted numerous articles from various publications (including that bi-partisan budget analysis) and you ignore them all and try to dismiss it by smearing me in the process.
The budet analysis has nothing to do w/ the economy, it's about the debt/defit of the US government down the round 35 years from now. What that has to do with consumer confidence rising in December of 2005 is beyond me...