vladomir,
I ran SuperPI 8M with FSB 311 MHz and CPU multiplier 9 (= 2800MHz) in various settings of memory frequency and timing to determine the best combination of freq and timing, because with high freq (DDR266) + low latency (2.5-3-3-8-1T) the system was not stable in the previous test. Curiously this time the system became stable in this combination. (Maybe memory has been burning in?) So the test became meaningless (use this combination!) However, as I have done the test, I will give the results just for reference anyway.
BIOS: 1.1
OS: Windows 2000 Professional (roughly x 1.25 slower than Windows XP in SuperPI)
VCore: 1.5500, VDDR: 2.60, VNB: 1.65, VSB: 2.65, VHT: 1.35, VDDRRef: 0mv
CPU Multiplier 10
FSB = 280 MHz, CPU = FSB x 10 = 2800 MHz, LDT = FSB x 4 = 1120 MHz
DDR266 = CPU/15 = 186.7 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-1T: 06m 35s
CPU Multiplier 9
FSB = 311 MHz, CPU = FSB x 9 = 2800 MHz, LDT = FSB x 3 = 933 MHz
DDR200 = CPU/18 = 155.6 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-1T: 07m 02s
DDR200 = CPU/18 = 155.6 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-2T: 07m 19s
DDR200 = CPU/18 = 155.6 MHz, 3-4-4-9-1T: 07m 14s
DDR200 = CPU/18 = 155.6 MHz, 3-4-4-9-2T: 07m 24s
DDR266 = CPU/14 = 200.0 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-1T: 06m 32s
DDR266 = CPU/14 = 200.0 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-2T: 06m 47s
DDR266 = CPU/14 = 200.0 MHz, 3-4-4-9-1T: 06m 40s
DDR266 = CPU/14 = 200.0 MHz, 3-4-4-9-2T: 07m 05s
The system also passed SuperPI with
FSB = 312 MHz, CPU = FSB x 9 = 2808 MHz, LDT = FSB x 3 = 936 MHz, DDR266 = 200.6 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-1T, 06m 27s
This is the best result in my Venice, faster than
FSB = 283 MHz, CPU = FSB x 10 = 2830 MHz, LDT = FSB x 4 = 1132 MHz, DDR266 = 188.7 MHz, 2.5-3-3-8-1T, 06m 34s
But the system freezed with FSB 313 MHz, DDR266.
Acutally I bought two Venice 3200+. The second Venice is of almost the same overclockability as my Winchester (max freq 2650 MHz). This is not bad, but not so good as the first Venice. Venice core is clearly hit-or-miss just as the previous cores.