Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
I hate double posting, but I am going to post this here for others to read so they don't have to link to another thread with the same exact post (received complaints, but didn't want to violate the rules) Anyway, here is the post!
I decided to test my friends E6750 because he wasn't sure if his motherboard was bad or if the chip was bad. Being that I just built my new C2Q rig and am having heat problems, I welcomed the idea as it would help me diagnose if I am simply doing something wrong, or if my Q6600 simple runs to damn hot.
Both tests were done in 23c room temperature, ran P95 mixed mode and temperatures were taken at 10 minutes into the test.
Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz (400x8 1.312v) Hottest CPU Core = 80c, PWM = 77c
PIC
E6750 @ 3.6Ghz (450x8 1.46vv) Hottest CPU Core = 56c, PWM = 54c
PIC
Tested with Tuniq Tower 120 - Fan on high. 4 Antec case fans on high.
So, the question is, does my Q6600 run abnormally hot? From the looks of it and doing the math, the answer would be 'No'. However, with people posting reports of 55c load temps on air, I really have to question that validity of those claims. Not because it isn't possible, but it just seems to me that if someone can run their Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz at 55c load, then it would stand to reason you can run your E6750 @ 30c load... Now, I never heard of that... In AT's test of their heat sinks they don't even test full load like Orthos/P95, they run like FarCry looped or something and their numbers are far from 30c on 'load'. So, I dunno guys, what do you think? Are people exaggerating their idle and load times? Or are people misreporting them innocently? Before I update the BIOS on my motherboard, the temps were 15c lower accross the board (they were reporting Tcase, or some BS like that) and truly thought my Q6600 was running great... I flashed BIOS and noticed that SOB was running far hotter than I thought. So, I wonder if a lot of people just think their temps are lower than they are.
Also, what is the wattage these things output? All things being equal (3.2, same voltage) I would expect a quad to have double the heat. However, the C2D runs higher voltage and clock speed, which increases its thermal output. It seems to be in the scenario I tested above that the E6750 = 125ish watts or so heat, and the Q6600 = 175ish watts... Just a guestimate!
Edit ** I am considering one of those things if my temps are still too high when I receive my new Thermalright SI-128 SE. I am either going to RMA my chip for a replacement, or I am going to lap it. I almost lapped it tonight, but I figured I better not rush something like that. I don't want to regret it. Hell, I am almost tempted to buy my friends E6750 and just ditch this Q6600. Runs too damn hot and before Aigo comes in and says I told ya so! I just gotta say, yeah, you were right... Water cooling does not look so bad afterall