MadScientist
Platinum Member
- Jul 15, 2001
- 2,155
- 48
- 91
I read your post on the Abit forum and his reply. I don't agree with the shotgun method of overclocking, but if you (he) want to run your ram at 4-4-4-12-2T, 2.05 vdimm, and a 1:1.2 divider, and it's stable, that's your call. I agree that for intial CPU testing running Prime95 for 1 hour at the Small FFts setting is sufficient, but for system stability you should run Prime95 Blend setting for at least 8 hours. If you are a gamer or do any video encoding, you will see why.Originally posted by: TungFree
I posted my concerns at Abit as well and SerpentRoyal Posted a reply with a simpler approach.
I followed it and now my setting has changed a bit:
3.3ghz 367x9 1.360Vcore 2.05V Dramm 4-4-4-12-2T
In Memtest #5 both 1.95 and 2.00 Dramm Volts failed while they passed in Prime 95 preveously.
So I am sticking with 2.05V Dramm setting.
The reason your ram failed memtest86+, test 5, at 4-4-4-12-2T, 1:1.2 divider, 367 FSB (880 mhz mem freq) at 1.95 and 2.00 vdimm and passed Prime95 is because you were running Prime95 on the Small FFts setting that puts very little stress on the ram. If you had run Prime95 on the Blend setting, that stresses both your CPU and ram, it would have most likely failed.
According to the CoreTemp program, what are your load temps (running Prime95, Small FFts setting) with your CPU set at 1.360 vcore?