About gun ownership

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
Seems like a dumb pool.

Yes, it was a lame joke... but the police are not so inept to accept the words of a suspected murderer as proof positive.

One can state they will defend their property with lethal force all they want.. but those same folks will have to accept the fact that they are now criminals themselves (at least in many jurisdictions). I'd go to great lengths to avoid living the rest of my life as a murderer.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Might ought to think about getting a dog.A real dog,not a yap yap dog.Look around your local shelter for German Shepard pups,or see a breeder.No one wants to confront a big dog.Plus get a weapon or two and I would get steel doors/bars on windows.I've lived in Louisiana for over fifty years and can count on one hand the times I have had to go to New Orleans,all but one on business.

Well with a family on the way, I'd like something that's a bit more kid-friendly. I was thinking of a Siberian, which I've read are good with kids, but are still risky as they have a hunter instinct, and might be prone to chasing running humans.

I suppose you can't have it both ways.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Yes, it was a lame joke... but the police are not so inept to accept the words of a suspected murderer as proof positive.

One can state they will defend their property with lethal force all they want.. but those same folks will have to accept the fact that they are now criminals themselves (at least in many jurisdictions). I'd go to great lengths to avoid living the rest of my life as a murderer.

No, they are not a criminal, the right to defend your life is absolute. If someone feels they are a criminal for defending their own life, than they need to seriously reevaluate their life.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Yes, it was a lame joke... but the police are not so inept to accept the words of a suspected murderer as proof positive.

One can state they will defend their property with lethal force all they want.. but those same folks will have to accept the fact that they are now criminals themselves (at least in many jurisdictions). I'd go to great lengths to avoid living the rest of my life as a murderer.

A killer, perhaps. A murderer? Killing in self-defense isn't, or shouldn't be, murder.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Yes, it was a lame joke... but the police are not so inept to accept the words of a suspected murderer as proof positive.

One can state they will defend their property with lethal force all they want.. but those same folks will have to accept the fact that they are now criminals themselves (at least in many jurisdictions). I'd go to great lengths to avoid living the rest of my life as a murderer.

Defending your home and property does not make you a murderer. I think the majority of Americans would agree with that statement.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
I can understand that sentiment, but as much as I support castle law, I don't think I'd adhere to it. It's a bit too harsh. If I just capped a guy in my house and he's on the floor bleeding out, I'm not gonna walk up to him and put a pill in his head. If he still had a gun I might.

I'm not saying you'd be that barbaric.
knowing me, I'd probably end up giving the douchebag first aid after all this tough talk... lol.

Hell, I've done first aid on Taliban/AQ assholes, and they did a lot more than try to steal my TVs!
 
Last edited:

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
A killer, perhaps. A murderer? Killing in self-defense isn't, or shouldn't be, murder.

I guess that depends on the place one lives. In most of the world "he was stealing my property" is not self defence. It is in fact second degree murder.

Though even still, I'd have a very hard time convincing myself that the act was not murder unless the threat was rather extreme in nature. I'm not sure I'd like to be known as a kiler either for that matter. But it is in some cases required.
 

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
Defending your home and property does not make you a murderer. I think the majority of Americans would agree with that statement.

But by the definition of the law, in many places it does. It certainly does in most of Europe and all of Canada. I'm not sure which states it does or does not make one a murdered.

I mean, sure, one could sit in jail for the rest of their lives considering themselves not murderers.. while still being convicted of such. I wouldn't so quickly assume majority either.. but I'll grant you that a good number would agree with you.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
Daedalus: Here's the thing, say some guy breaks through my window with a crowbar. I have no clue as to his intentions, other than that they are violent. There is no way to tell if he's there to steal my TV, kill my future family, or both. So what's safer for me, and by extension for my future family? To engage him in H2H with whatever's handy (if any) or to bust out a firearm and kill him from a distance? Let alone if there's more than one assailant.

Anyone breaks into my house, I will quite literally be "afraid for my life" (legal defense) and they'll be greeted by some form of lead. Period.

That said, if you live in an area where crime is so low you feel as safe as you do, more power to you. Here's a story though: I grew up in a DC suburb, one of the richest, whitest areas in the country. The public schools I went to are on par with most areas' private schools. Back in high school I got takeout from the same place, same time after school virtually every day for a couple of months. This place was in what was widely considered to be an extremely safe area. One day I go in, get my take-out as usual, and come out to a Hispanic guy with a weird ear ring (later confirmed as a gang sign) with his face pressed against my car's window. We notice each other when I'm about 20' away, and he gives me an eyes wide death glare. I drop eye contact and walk evasively back toward the restaurant (where there were people), and he eventually got in his car and drove off. But I had nothing at the time and had he come at me I probably would have been screwed. This was in broad daylight.

Bottom line, bad shit can happen anywhere. I got lucky. Experiences like that (I've got a few other less severe tales) are why I will soon own and carry. Not that I'm counting on them, but they happen. I can't say I understand how you can feel safe knowing that you, personally, would be completely helpless in the moment of crisis if it came. Not that you should live your life around it, but I feel being able to competently defend yourself (and potentially others) is just one of those life skills everyone should know. Like driving or some basic form of a sport. Besides, if nothing else going out with friends and shooting is fun.
 

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
Daedalus: Here's the thing, say some guy breaks through my window with a crowbar. I have no clue as to his intentions, other than that they are violent. There is no way to tell if he's there to steal my TV, kill my future family, or both. So what's safer for me, and by extension for my future family? To engage him in H2H with whatever's handy (if any) or to bust out a firearm and kill him from a distance? Let alone if there's more than one assailant.

Anyone breaks into my house, I will quite literally be "afraid for my life" (legal defense) and they'll be greeted by some form of lead. Period.

That said, if you live in an area where crime is so low you feel as safe as you do, more power to you. Here's a story though: I grew up in a DC suburb, one of the richest, whitest areas in the country. The public schools I went to are on par with most areas' private schools. Back in high school I got takeout from the same place, same time after school virtually every day for a couple of months. This place was in what was widely considered to be an extremely safe area. One day I go in, get my take-out as usual, and come out to a Hispanic guy with a weird ear ring (later confirmed as a gang sign) with his face pressed against my car's window. We notice each other when I'm about 20' away, and he gives me an eyes wide death glare. I drop eye contact and walk evasively back toward the restaurant (where there were people), and he eventually got in his car and drove off. But I had nothing at the time and had he come at me I probably would have been screwed. This was in broad daylight.

Bottom line, bad shit can happen anywhere. I got lucky. Experiences like that (I've got a few other less severe tales) are why I will soon own and carry. Not that I'm counting on them, but they happen. I can't say I understand how you can feel safe knowing that you, personally, would be completely helpless in the moment of crisis if it came. Not that you should live your life around it, but I feel being able to competently defend yourself (and potentially others) is just one of those life skills everyone should know. Like driving or some basic form of a sport. Besides, if nothing else going out with friends and shooting is fun.

Ok.. but my first reaction would be to threaten them verbally.. why on earth would I shoot unless I knew exactly what their intentions were? Despite my moral objection to doing that, it is unquestionably murder where I live.

I feel safe because I understand statistics. It is not worth worrying about things will likely never happen to me and even if someone did break in only another rare fraction would be a situation I could not handle.. If it really came down to it as a last resort I could run away.. or I could die trying.. but that would be the same in some situations regardless of the weapons I possess.

I'm confused how you think I am unable to defend myself.. I am quite capable of looking after my own.. I don't feel I need a gun for that.. Mind you it is not an option to me anyway given the laws of the land. Regardless of how "prepared" I am there is some situation I could dream up where it would not be enough... seems I drew the line of "who bloody cares, it is not worth worrying about" a bit earlier than some others.

I mean, if my neighbour got beaten and robbed in his own home my first reaction would not be "I should get a gun" but "what can I do to make sure that sort of thing is far less likely in the future."



To Nick. I can only claim I know it is murder in those places I said right after I don't know where it is illegal in the states, but I'm sure there are many states that have very similar laws to Canada. I don't understand how the act of killing someone could be anything but a terrible thing, required or not.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
No but state and federal prosecuters do. If you shoot someone and/or kill them, it better have been because you had a reasonable fear of great bodily harm or loss of life (or the defense of another from the same).

You'll be in deep water if you shoot someone running out of your house with a TV, even with a castle doctrine, but the law says you can stop them from leaving with your property with reasonable physical force, then escalate to deadly force when they confront you and become a threat.

Almost every castle doctrine law stil requires that the person was a threat and that the action was justfied under the normal use for force laws. Castle doctrine does not give a licence to unconditionally shoot or kill someone for being in your house. It only gives you legal immunity if you do end up shooting or killing someone in your house for a valid reason as defined by the regular laws regarding use of force.

If someone is running down the street when they hear me pump my shotgun, I'm not going to shoot them in the back. But if they're still in my house, they're a threat to my life. I don't know if they have a gun tucked in their pants or not and I'm not going to wait to find out. Sorry, but I'm not about stand there for a wild west quickdraw showdown with some scumbag who has already proven he doesn't respect me or my property. If I see them before they see me, they're dead.
 
Last edited:

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Im sure if someone made such a retarded generalization about a minority you would be calling them a racist.

I've learned it's best just to ignore CitizenLame. He's a thumb sucking troll who isn't able to properly wipe himself without government assistance.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
Ok.. but my first reaction would be to threaten them verbally.. why on earth would I shoot unless I knew exactly what their intentions were? Despite my moral objection to doing that, it is unquestionably murder where I live.

I feel safe because I understand statistics. It is not worth worrying about things will likely never happen to me and even if someone did break in only another rare fraction would be a situation I could not handle.. If it really came down to it as a last resort I could run away.. or I could die trying.. but that would be the same in some situations regardless of the weapons I possess.

I'm confused how you think I am unable to defend myself.. I am quite capable of looking after my own.. I don't feel I need a gun for that.. Mind you it is not an option to me anyway given the laws of the land. Regardless of how "prepared" I am there is some situation I could dream up where it would not be enough... seems I drew the line of "who bloody cares, it is not worth worrying about" a bit earlier than some others.

I mean, if my neighbour got beaten and robbed in his own home my first reaction would not be "I should get a gun" but "what can I do to make sure that sort of thing is far less likely in the future."



To Nick. I can only claim I know it is murder in those places I said right after I don't know where it is illegal in the states, but I'm sure there are many states that have very similar laws to Canada. I don't understand how the act of killing someone could be anything but a terrible thing, required or not.

Threatening them verbally could be an opening for them to attack. By the time you've said "who's there?" or "drop it" they could be in your face or have otherwise moved. Surprise is your friend. As for dunk people just wandering in.. is this a common occurrence in Canada? Everyone I've known since birth keeps their doors locked even during the day, if only with a cheap lock on a glass door. Suffice to say if people wandering in was relatively common I'd probably go with a verbal warning as well, but where I live to get in without my permission usually requires breaking something with intent.

And yeah, I know Canada's one of those gun-anal places. Not advocating you break the law. (although if the 2nd amendment was ever abolished I probably would)

When it comes to defending yourself, a gun and proper knowledge on how to use it gives you a serious advantage over your adversary. Unless you're Jet Li, I fail to see how you could be guaranteed to defend yourself effectively. As for running, if you're in your house/in close quarters that may not be an option.

As for the stats, like I said I don't see it as an issue of preparing for the immediate, but just a fact of life. I know how to use a gun in the same sense that I know how to drive, play soccer, and program in c++. And hell screw my relatively safe neighborhood, I drive a lot. I've had to change tires/gas up/find my way out of some pretty shady areas (where some of said less severe stories have come from). Hell I once used an outdoor restroom at a gas station and there was a full blown nightstick attached to the key lol.

But I digress. If you feel that safe... good for you. Hope you don't end up over your head someday. Personally I don't like relying on others (police) for my personal safety, and even if your MPs do show up in 60 seconds.. a lot can happen with a determined criminal in 60 seconds; and even calling the police is a lot more risky than acting direct (although less risky than H2H with a potentially armed stranger who for all you know is more skilled than you). But I guess for me crime is more of a potential issue for me. Stay safe.. or at lest your approximation of safe (sorry, couldn't resist).
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
No one is implying that one should flee their own home... but just that most criminals are likely sacred out of their pants in the first place... they don't want to have to steal for a living (most anyway) and that simply screaming at them to get the hell out would often be enough.. Any assertion of threat on the part of the home owner would likely be enough.. Besides that, I have no desire to spend the rest of my life in jail, thus I would not kill burglar unless I absolutely had to (the only time I would not be up on second degree murder charges).

You must lead a very sheltered life. You actually believe criminals are scared?
 

CaptainGoodnight

Golden Member
Oct 13, 2000
1,427
30
91
I guess that depends on the place one lives. In most of the world "he was stealing my property" is not self defence. It is in fact second degree murder.

One of the three most fundamental human rights is property. ("life, liberty and property") Don't place a low value on it. Societies that don't usually lack the other two.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Yes, because you would be a murderer and a coward... I have a hard time labelling anyone who shoots without actually being in threat of death themselves as anything but a coward.

When a person who you know is a criminal is walking toward you even after you've told them to stop, what do you think their intentions are? A friendly chat?

You're willfully ignorant and horribly naive.
 

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
You must lead a very sheltered life. You actually believe criminals are scared?

I didn't say all criminals... 90% of 'criminals' in my area of teens either taking crap to sell for booze, taking the booze, or taking stuff to break having already consumed the booze. Not exactly the kind of folk that would instill fear in my soul..

A criminal is still human, I'm sure we have a few that are the hardened pro type... but they generally don't get the chance to get very good at it. Or maybe they don't practice having never had to rob someone with a gun.. I have no idea.

I guess you could call the fact hat we don't have to deal with crime of that nature here sheltered... sigh.

We simply don't have the same crime as you guys I guess... though I'm not ever going to whine about how sheltered I feel because of it.. lol
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
It was a sawed off double barrel, maybe 10' away, the first shot was right at the top left of my pelvis which sent me to the ground, didn't knock me down, but my leg just stopped supporting me, the second shot he ran up to me, and put the gun about three feet from my face, I pulled my leg in between the barrel and my head and the shot went through my calf and into the rear of my thigh. After wards I got up, and chased the motherfucker but couldn't catch him, so I jumped in his car, and ran over him, then drove myself to call the hospital.

So no, a .410 isn't good for defense, as it is too under powered for non-precision shooting but it can penetrate, and if hit in a more critical area can definitely kill, that was my point.

I personally carry a Glock 26, and use a SBR .223 for home defense. It's small enough to be very maneuverable, powerful enough to kill at both close, and medium range, but the short barrel keeps the over penetration of neighbors walls to a minimum.

You should have just made a noise. According to that pansy Canuck in this thread, that would have been enough to prevent him from shooting you.
 

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
When a person who you know is a criminal is walking toward you even after you've told them to stop, what do you think their intentions are? A friendly chat?

You're willfully ignorant and horribly naive.

I am neither... sigh. But I guess us Canadians are more manly here as we don't need no stinking guns to beat the crap out of someone...


If they don't leave... then we have escalation of threat don't we... I never said they could not pose a threat.. I said that shooting first was insane (and very illegal in some places).

If they come at me and are armed, I guess I either attack them with something and hope I don't get killed, call for help, or leave. Though if I don't attempt to leave before I attack them it could also be assault.
 

Daedalus685

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,386
1
0
You should have just made a noise. According to that pansy Canuck in this thread, that would have been enough to prevent him from shooting you.
Wow... you win the Internet sir..

So because I don't need a gun to thwart off a crook I'm the pansy? Really?

I'm glad you have so eloquently ignored the entire point... For people who seem to dehumanize criminals so much you certainly talk up their abilities a hell of a lot.

Ugg, I never said a noise would scare off a person resolved to shoot you.. I compared the common criminal to a rat (well squirrel).. The ones sulking around after my Bike who run off at a simple threat of "don't make me come down there."
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
-snip-
I had a few questions to you guys regarding gun ownership, which are reflected in the attached polls.

Thanks.

I prefer revolvers for home defense. I have .38 spc and .357 mags.

I prefer a revolver over a semi-auto to avoid any risks of jams etc. I have a semi-auto and can clear jams and shoot simultaneously, yet still prefer my revolvers.

If you are concerned about over-penetration there is ammo available to reduce that risk.

My house is fairly small, with small rooms so I feel the area is just to 'tight' for a shotgun. I suppose if I lived in a house with huge rooms a shotgun might be a good choice. If so, I think I'd go with a 20 gauge. IMO, a 12 gauge is overkill etc.

Fern
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |