I notice you did not engage with any substantive points.I won't miss you. The rest of you have a nice day, I've said all I care to. But really guys, take a chill pill and give one to Sotomayor while you're at it, you could really imagine her hyperventilating while banging out her dissent.
See you next time, hopefully not too soon.
He won’t because he is ignorant clown. He answered no questions and now is attacking “liberal” justice. Seems clear he is magat concern troll, willfully ignorant or just dumb. Notice he didn’t say anything about the ethics of Thomas and Alito ruling on case with clear conflicts. Interesting that is.I notice you did not engage with any substantive points.
Yes, it seems like the exchange was basically:He won’t because he is ignorant clown. He answered no questions and now is attacking “liberal” justice. Seems clear he is magat concern troll, willfully ignorant or just dumb. Notice he didn’t say anything about the ethics of Thomas and Alito ruling on case with clear conflicts. Interesting that is.
Biden can’t remove federal judges/ justices. That power is reserved for congress by impeachment…and the (R)s ain’t never gonna impeach one of their own.These are the best law experts in the US? Anything the US President orders anyone in government to do is by definition official business. Biden should remove the justices that decided this due to gross incompetence.
He can absolutely remove federal judges/justices now. General Fascist, I order you to take out these justices with military strike.Biden can’t remove federal judges/ justices. That power is reserved for congress by impeachment…and the (R)s ain’t never gonna impeach one of their own.
everything done as the US President is legal now.Biden can’t remove federal judges/ justices. That power is reserved for congress by impeachment…and the (R)s ain’t never gonna impeach one of their own.
Yeah, not sure what people aren’t getting here. He can now kill SCOTUS if they do things he doesn’t like. Congress tries to impeach him? Kill them too. Someone tries to run for president against you? Killed.He can absolutely remove federal judges/justices now. General Fascist, I order you to take out these justices with military strike.
Official act is done. Immune. Not allowed to determine intent of act. The argument by Trump lawyers was literally a President can order seam team six to asssinate political rival and be immune from any repercussions.
Congress moves to impeach President for action. President removes opposition party to Guantanamo as terrorists and traitors. Official act. Immune. Not allowed to determine intent of act.
How is anyone not understanding the insanity and unamerican nature of this ruling?
He can absolutely remove federal judges/justices now. General Fascist, I order you to take out these justices with military strike.
Official act is done. Immune. Not allowed to determine intent of act. The argument by Trump lawyers was literally a President can order seam team six to asssinate political rival and be immune from any repercussions.
Congress moves to impeach President for action. President removes opposition party to Guantanamo as terrorists and traitors. Official act. Immune. Not allowed to determine intent of act.
How is anyone not understanding the insanity and unamerican nature of this ruling?
I refuse to succumb to lazy cynicism. Better things are possible: we just have to keep voting for it, pressing our elected officials, and engaging with one another. It's a slog, but we shouldn't give up, because it isn't going to be the white men that the most severe consequences are going to fall on.
Not quite.No, technically the court just said the president can do anything he wants now. All he has to do is say it was related to his official capacity in upholding national security.
I think the justices are confusing Thomas Hobbes with the Founding Fathers, with a touch of the Nazi, Carl Schmitt (author of "The Problem of Parliamentary Democracy and believer of the idea that the executive must be able to act in the exception, even extra-legally), thrown in for good measure.Not quite.
Thr argument they push is that in his official capacity as president, as defined by duties and whatever he is immune from prosecution.
So as president, telling his vice president to commit election fraud. Immune.
Telling state officials to commit election fraud. Not immune.
They toss out a lot of federalist touch Feely bullshit about the president should not have his feelings hurt because he has to be all Rambo and Thomas has some bull shit about special counsel and whatever.
The big wtf is the outer rim crap.
I new those fuckers secreted rim jobs at those billionaire orgy yacht outings.
Still reading....
Going to be interesting how Barret evolves as a Justice over time
Again, the President can remove those state officials unwilling to do his/her bidding to Guantanamo as terrorists and a danger to America. Official act. Immune. Can’t ask about intent.Not quite.
Thr argument they push is that in his official capacity as president, as defined by duties and whatever he is immune from prosecution.
So as president, telling his vice president to commit election fraud. Immune.
Telling state officials to commit election fraud. Not immune.
They toss out a lot of federalist touch Feely bullshit about the president should not have his feelings hurt because he has to be all Rambo and Thomas has some bull shit about special counsel and whatever.
The big wtf is the outer rim crap.
I new those fuckers secreted rim jobs at those billionaire orgy yacht outings.
Still reading....
Going to be interesting how Barret evolves as a Justice over time
So, what you are saying is that you did not read the ruling and don't know that the president cannot remove state election officials.Again, the President can remove those state officials unwilling to do his/her bidding to Guantanamo as terrorists and a danger to America. Official act. Immune. Can’t ask about intent.
Looks like you’re the one who didn’t read the decision. He can have them arrested or killed at his leisure.So, what you are saying is that you did not read the ruling and don't know that the president cannot remove state election officials.
I'm referencing Barretts's comments on page 63-64So, what you are saying is that you did not read the ruling and don't know that the president cannot remove state election officia
Looks like you’re the one who didn’t read the decision. He can have them arrested or killed at his leisure.
That’s a concurrence and is not controlling. I would read the actual opinion. It is abundantly clear that the president is immune for all official acts and it expressly states communicating with other executive branch officials are official acts. For example, it mentioned that asking Pence to commit a coup was an official act.I'm referencing Barretts's comments on page 63-64
What page do you recommend
That’s a concurrence and is not controlling. I would read the actual opinion. It is abundantly clear that the president is immune for all official acts and it expressly states communicating with other executive branch officials are official acts. For example, it mentioned that asking Pence to commit a coup was an official act.
So it could be true that talking to Arizona officials would not be an official act and he could be prosecuted, but ordering the military to kill them or for federal law enforcement to arrest them would be, and for those he would be immune.