So far, the facts surrounding the San-Berdoo attack include the origin of Tashkeen Malik.
Farook had traveled to Saudi Arabia to engage her, and she'd only been in the US since 2013. Farook himself had been born in Illinois.
So what would compel someone to leave their 6-month-old baby in the hands of relatives so they could go out and kill people at a Christmas party?
That indicates the insanity dimension to the radicalization that may have occurred -- and seems likely.
ISIS isn't taking credit for this, even as they applaud it. And then, you add some workplace grievance, which seems to underlie it. Here's this guy earning about $13,000/year more than the California family median income of $57,000. He owns a house. He has a big SUV.
For Tashkeen and Syed: was there some sort of problem they had with "a Christmas party" among office workers? And who stirred up those issues -- if there were any?
I think the suspicion for this almost-unexplainable attack is beginning to fall on Tashkeen Malik. Until 2013, she hadn't been part of a wider family circle around Farook -- an extended family that seems to be "just an ordinary family of American Muslims."
And they're the ones who will suffer in American Public Opinion. Just what Dr. Baghdadi prescribes.
Considering the nature of the public facility attacked, it almost seems like a copy-cat replication of Dear's assault on Planned Parenthood.
And I keep saying that a threat from radical Islamists seems pretty desperate, if they're copying attacks made by Lanza, Holmes, Dear and others.
It's like saying "See?! We're insane, too!"