That's inspired. Finally, I can email AMD to give them an ad campaign their worse than useless marketing and sales could never create. Radeon! The game mutilator!
Seriously, this stuff is better than anything AMD has done since they put Ruby on the cards.I like money. Do you like money too? Buy Radeon and save money.
I like money. Do you like money too? Buy Radeon and save money.
Go away! Gamin'!-Honestly AMD's marketing would be 100% better if they just put Frito in charge.
Welcome to AMD. We love you.Go away! Gamin'!
You're not wrong. While our gang is familiar with it. If it isn't on the shelf in stores, or their friends don't have one, I doubt most average gamers have any idea the 6700 exists. And indeed, that 51RISC is nothing more than a reconditioned Powercolor Fighter. It is why they blacked out the name in GPU-Z as the lone review mentions. You can get the 6700 at Amazon as well, the XFX version is $290, $299 at Newegg.
I only used the 6700 for debating purposes because it points out what a wet blanket the 7600 is. It brings nothing worthwhile for budget gamers IMO. More vram was the only feature that could have made it an attractive purchase in mid 2023. The 4060 will crush it worse than the 3050 has done to the 6600.
I am at a loss why it seems compelling to anyone at $249. Some models of 6650XT have dropped below $225 multiple times and they don't even sell out. As someone else said, it's like AMD isn't even trying anymore.
They screwed over their own brand by fumbling too many times. That's how stuff like this happens.How is it AMD's fault people buy 3050's over 6600/6600XT's? Or 1050's over 480/590's before that? Geforce sells.
They really do hurt their own brand too often. Some may reply that Nvidia does it too. But they are not held to the same standard, for whatever reason. It isn't fair, but that's life.They screwed over their own brand by fumbling too many times. That's how stuff like this happens.
Ultimately they keep delivering. This is actually the first time in a long time that they've really made a truly unappetizing product line, but even then there is no one to punish them for it.They really do hurt their own brand too often. Some may reply that Nvidia does it too. But they are not held to the same standard, for whatever reason. It isn't fair, but that's life.
Ultimately they keep delivering. This is actually the first time in a long time that they've really made a truly unappetizing product line, but even then there is no one to punish them for it.
Meanwhile Turing has aged poorly and going forward is probably going to have to rely on FSR for performance improvements. Lovelace is on such a bleeding edge node that there won't be a huge bump from buying a 3nm card from the next generation. Unless NVidia changes heading, next generation DLSS that might not be supported by the 4000 series probably won't be all that useful.
Turing was worse in my opinion.
Oh, he definitely has that. Why else would he keep making brain dead decisions for the 4000 series GPUs? He's like a rabid zombie going, "Moarrrr money! Moarrr RAM chips to use on moarrrr cards! Pinch pinch pinch! Gotta make profits above anything else!"Seriously, watching Jensen made me wonder if he has some sort of cognitive/memory disease.
If it's a single instance, it can be jet lag, illness or whatever. It might also just be a lack of preparation. It was a demanding key note anyway. Intel, Apple and AMD don't make their CEO do a 2 hour keynote.Seriously, watching Jensen made me wonder if he has some sort of cognitive/memory disease. Or he was tripping.