ADD/ADHD folks: any perspective from lifelong medication users?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gintaras

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,892
1
71
As for the OP, I don't think the validity of treatment needs to be debated. Kid's too young. Period.

It might be that kids parents were on drugs/medication for long time...genes might be altered....

I'm one of those LUCKY, who was born in USSR...we didn't have some material(electronics...etc) things that our age kids had that were born in West, but we didn't have mental, many medical problems and MOST important - DEPRESSION

Does anyone look deppresed on these photos
 

kache

Senior member
Nov 10, 2012
486
0
71
It might be that kids parents were on drugs/medication for long time...genes might be altered....

I'm one of those LUCKY, who was born in USSR...we didn't have some material(electronics...etc) things that our age kids had that were born in West, but we didn't have mental, many medical problems and MOST important - DEPRESSION

Does anyone look deppresed on these photos

Look =/= Be

Many people look perfectly normal, yet they kill themselves the day after...
 

MonKENy

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2007
2,026
3
81
we run a staff of 12 clinicians and everyone said the same thing. Hes too young to be put on meds. How severe is he? At 5 years old no one thinks its a safe bet. MAYBE if he was around 10 and it was a very temporary solution or if he was going into school and flipping over desks and running around the school etc.

Please go see another doctor and get a second opinion.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,077
136
I don't have much to add to the discussion of medications at this point; I am curious about a few things, though OP.

At what age did your child start watching TV/cartoons, even if just plopped in front for some entertainment while parents were watching/dinner was being eaten/etc.? Also, does your child have any handheld gaming device (smart phone/game system/etc.) that he plays?
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
That's strange. Caffeine should exacerbate the distraction issues....

Drugs are weird. Amphetamines like Dexedrine and Adderall give me super human ability to concentrate and get complex tasks done, but methylphenidate made me so profoundly confused that all I could do was lay down and wait for it to wear off. Methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta) made me feel like my brain was trying to run in multiple directions at the same time. I guess methylphenidate really helps some people, but I can't understand how.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
After much ado, we've started our 5-yo son on Focalin. The difference is night and day, even with the lowest possible dose.

Presumably there are some young adults here who grew up (or parents of those kids) who have had experience with the drug or drugs in it's class. I'm curious – how do you feel about it, many years in?

Of course the difference is night and day. Give any 5 year old those drugs and it will be a night and day difference in thier behavior.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
It might be that kids parents were on drugs/medication for long time...genes might be altered....

I'm one of those LUCKY, who was born in USSR...we didn't have some material(electronics...etc) things that our age kids had that were born in West, but we didn't have mental, many medical problems and MOST important - DEPRESSION

Does anyone look deppresed on these photos

They are all on the Vodka
The depression starts when they quit drinking
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
The whole point of this thread was to get opinions from people who had been on these drugs long term, starting in childhood.

Medication at this age is a concern to me, but so is Myxolydian's early point about what are the consequences of NOT helping him right now.

That said, I'm thoroughly enjoying the wild assumptions and baseless attacks on my parenting. We read plenty of books together; we eat well; we've tried other strategies prior to this. I don't consider myself 'done' now that I've got a prescription. So, yeah.

What exactly is the problem with your 5 year old that requires the use of a psychotropic drug? Focalin has not been approved by the FDA for 5 year olds.

My big concern is the use of psychotropic drugs on a very young child during a period of rapid growth of the brain and central nervous system.

No need to rush things, some children might bloom a little later and will do perfectly well, trying to force something by using drugs at such an early age could lead to irreversible changes in the brain, changes that you will not be able to predict.

There has been cases of psychosis and aggressive behaivor from the use of focalin, also it has a high risk of dependency from extended use. It is a schedule ii drug.

The FDA has an advisory against the use of this drug on children under 6 years of age.

Remember you only get one shot at this and it is best to err on the side of caution.
 

Agent11

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2006
3,535
1
0
Society has changed a lot in the last 50 years in America. I am of the opinion that 90% of the people on medication for depression and ADD do not need it.

Used to be kids had hills and woods to run around in and raise hell, now they sit around most of the time. Then the parents wonder that they act like they are stir crazy?

Also many people have cause to be melancholy, does this mean that their brains aren't working properly and they require medication? Of course not.
 

Scooby Doo

Golden Member
Sep 1, 2006
1,040
18
81
And kids died from consumption or some other unknown disease. Oh well.. have another couple...
 

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
The worst is not the meds its, the special treatment and the sense of entitlement these children are given. How they are given extra time on test and assignments. This is very damaging to them and society.
 

Vdubchaos

Lifer
Nov 11, 2009
10,411
10
0
It might be that kids parents were on drugs/medication for long time...genes might be altered....

I'm one of those LUCKY, who was born in USSR...we didn't have some material(electronics...etc) things that our age kids had that were born in West, but we didn't have mental, many medical problems and MOST important - DEPRESSION

Does anyone look deppresed on these photos

Depression is a bigger "pill" issue than ADD/ADHD and all of the others combined. That's mostly because EVERYONE has it (at times), it's an emotion and part of LIFE.

And those that have it more often = illeness

Again, they managed to make EVERY human emotion into a disease and have a pill for it.

Look up Japaneses market and depression. 10 years ago or so "depression pills" were no where on the horizon. TODAY it's a billion dollar industry.

Not saying SOME people don't have a severe/serious issue (they do)....but not THIS many, sorry.

The worst is not the meds its, the special treatment and the sense of entitlement these children are given. How they are given extra time on test and assignments. This is very damaging to them and society.

Agreed
 

rivan

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2003
9,677
3
81
I don't have much to add to the discussion of medications at this point; I am curious about a few things, though OP.

At what age did your child start watching TV/cartoons, even if just plopped in front for some entertainment while parents were watching/dinner was being eaten/etc.? Also, does your child have any handheld gaming device (smart phone/game system/etc.) that he plays?

As much as I dislike it, my wife is one of those people who turns on the TV as soon as she gets up, even if she has no intention to watch; she likes the background noise. Typically it's just the news.

We let him watch cartoons for a limited amount of time (typically no more than 30 minutes) starting around probably around age 2. Too young, I know. Hindsight. He'll take 'screen time' any chance he gets - totally different from his older sister, who's in the same environment and got cartoons at a similar age/exposure level.

We got a Fire last year. There are a number of games on it, mostly educational (though it hasn't always been this way). Use time crept up to almost an hour/day, most days at one point and we've drastically cut back on it. For months it's been ~30 minutes on weekends only.

I'm crystal clear that this may be our fault in whole or - more likely imo - in part. I believe at least part of this is genetic; many of the behaviors I see in him remind me of myself at his age. I'm interested in saving him some of that stress.

Of course the difference is night and day. Give any 5 year old those drugs and it will be a night and day difference in thier behavior.

Yep. But is the difference a change from constant class and team sport disruptions and constant distraction to active, happy participation?

It's not turning him into a zombie.

Trust me, I'm reticent about the medication; I'm one of those weirdos who actively avoids pills as a rule. But as I've mentioned before in this thread, I see my kid having a hard time doing the this thread and it's my job to do whatever I can.

What exactly is the problem with your 5 year old that requires the use of a psychotropic drug? Focalin has not been approved by the FDA for 5 year olds.

I've only found out about the age recommendation through this thread (but had similar reservations before it). We're just a few weeks from 6, and he's a big kid, so perhaps that figured in. I'm looking at the FDA guide and digging up studies currently.

His issues are, as redundant as it seems to type out, attention centered. If the activity is something super active, he's fine. If it's something he likes and requires concentration (coloring and Lego, mostly) he can stick with it. Outside that, he struggles. He loves playing soccer and basketball - can't wait to go to practice/games but once there if he's idle on the field or bench for 30 seconds, he completely loses focus to the extent the pack of kids with the ball could rumble right past him without him noticing. Afterward he's upset with himself over it. Not for long, but he is.

It's challenging him similarly socially and scholastically. He's a bright kid; a natural problem and puzzle solver. I don't think he (or all kids, as alluded above) needs to get As but I also don't think he deserves to fall (farther) behind because I didn't act when I should have.

I know what you're thinking - he's a 5(almost 6)-year old. And a boy. But I've been watching him among his peers for a long time and it's just not in the same league.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
As much as I dislike it, my wife is one of those people who turns on the TV as soon as she gets up, even if she has no intention to watch; she likes the background noise. Typically it's just the news.

We let him watch cartoons for a limited amount of time (typically no more than 30 minutes) starting around probably around age 2. Too young, I know. Hindsight. He'll take 'screen time' any chance he gets - totally different from his older sister, who's in the same environment and got cartoons at a similar age/exposure level.

We got a Fire last year. There are a number of games on it, mostly educational (though it hasn't always been this way). Use time crept up to almost an hour/day, most days at one point and we've drastically cut back on it. For months it's been ~30 minutes on weekends only.

I'm crystal clear that this may be our fault in whole or - more likely imo - in part. I believe at least part of this is genetic; many of the behaviors I see in him remind me of myself at his age. I'm interested in saving him some of that stress.



Yep. But is the difference a change from constant class and team sport disruptions and constant distraction to active, happy participation?

It's not turning him into a zombie.

Trust me, I'm reticent about the medication; I'm one of those weirdos who actively avoids pills as a rule. But as I've mentioned before in this thread, I see my kid having a hard time doing the this thread and it's my job to do whatever I can.



I've only found out about the age recommendation through this thread (but had similar reservations before it). We're just a few weeks from 6, and he's a big kid, so perhaps that figured in. I'm looking at the FDA guide and digging up studies currently.

His issues are, as redundant as it seems to type out, attention centered. If the activity is something super active, he's fine. If it's something he likes and requires concentration (coloring and Lego, mostly) he can stick with it. Outside that, he struggles. He loves playing soccer and basketball - can't wait to go to practice/games but once there if he's idle on the field or bench for 30 seconds, he completely loses focus to the extent the pack of kids with the ball could rumble right past him without him noticing. Afterward he's upset with himself over it. Not for long, but he is.

It's challenging him similarly socially and scholastically. He's a bright kid; a natural problem and puzzle solver. I don't think he (or all kids, as alluded above) needs to get As but I also don't think he deserves to fall (farther) behind because I didn't act when I should have.

I know what you're thinking - he's a 5(almost 6)-year old. And a boy. But I've been watching him among his peers for a long time and it's just not in the same league.

Nothing you are describing sounds like a problem that requires medication. In fact your description sounds like myself when I was a young child I did not take medications. I grew up naturally and ended up living a successful life. I sure as heck tested the patience of my parents and teachers at times when I was young. I think you are rushing to mold him into something. He is five years old, he is only starting out and he might not be the perfect "Soccer kid" So he gets distracted when he is just sitting doing nothing but waiting. Thats normal.

Sad that our world is pushing pharms on young children for things that are really just normal childhood behavior. Just get him out of that boring structured sports league shit and do other things with him that will keep his young growing active mind interested. Maybe when he is older that structured sports team league stuff might be something he will do better in to your level of satisfaction.

My parents kept me interested and occupied by plying me with chemistry sets, old TV,radio,etc sets to take apart, 300 and 1 electronic kits,legos,erector sets,trips to the library. then BMXing Hutch Prostar , trips to science museum etc..

Your 5 year old sounds like a bright kid who probably gets bored sitting around like a halfwit waiting for some soccer ball to come his way and is probably daydreaming big ideas to spare him the boredom. Seriously do not snuff that out so he could fit in with the masses.
 
Last edited:

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,420
293
126
It's challenging him similarly socially and scholastically. He's a bright kid; a natural problem and puzzle solver. I don't think he (or all kids, as alluded above) needs to get As but I also don't think he deserves to fall (farther) behind because I didn't act when I should have.

I know what you're thinking - he's a 5(almost 6)-year old. And a boy. But I've been watching him among his peers for a long time and it's just not in the same league.
Directly in opposition to those (who don't know any better) claiming that children diagnosed with ADD/ADHD are just displaying normal behavior like all the other kids, most parents seeking help for their child are exactly in your shoes. They (and often others such as teachers, coaches, other family members) have observed their child exhibiting problems that most other children are NOT, and while the child may have more or less severe problems depending on the context or activity, they have noticed a clear pattern that exists through multiple contexts, be it in sports, learning an instrument, playing games, reading, in the classroom, or at home.

I hope you've taken notice from where most of your critics are coming. Mental health professionals? Nope. Physicians? Nope. Hell, someone who has raised a few children? Not even. So far, we have:

- One clearly disgruntled poster who can hardly confine his contempt for his parents for 'ruining his life', just because his trust fund didn't come through. Now you have to wonder....if he is still so obviously bitter about it after all this time, imagine what he was like back then? I'm betting he gave his parents plenty of cause to send him to a psychiatrist, whom he also blames (apparently)

- At least two posters who clearly are resentful that persons with disabilities receive accommodations, which they call "unfair" because they never got them.

It is important to understand there is a lot of self-loathing in mental illness or other conditions that carry a massive stigma due to ignorance. Just like a lot of vehement homophobes secretly enjoy homosexual rendezvous when they're not with their wife and children or in church, there are actually a number of persons who have received diagnosis for a mental health condition or other misunderstood disorder that carries a highly negative stigma, are taking medication for it, but nonetheless will be outspoken critics of the psychiatric profession and medications. They will tell others that rather than resorting to drugs, they remedied their problems by pulling-up their bootstraps and getting on with it, when in fact they are on the very medications against which they rant.

And then you have the ones who actually do refuse the treatment, claim they are doing just fine by their own force of will, while their life is actually a pretty sad state of dysfunction, which they conceal from everyone.
 
Last edited:

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
And then you have the ones who actually do refuse the treatment, claim they are doing just fine by their own force of will, while their life is actually a pretty sad state of dysfunction, which they conceal from everyone.
Said by my friend: "I don't need any of that antidepressant bullshit"
He spends thousands of dollars per year on marijuana. Antidepressants are cheap and they are covered by insurance, so they would cost about $100/year in comparison.
 

Agent11

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2006
3,535
1
0
Said by my friend: "I don't need any of that antidepressant bullshit"
He spends thousands of dollars per year on marijuana. Antidepressants are cheap and they are covered by insurance, so they would cost about $100/year in comparison.

It's too bad marijuana isn't legal. It's safer and has fewer complications.
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,462
0
0
Not on drugs, don't have kids on drugs, but have a bunch of friends who are dealing with the same dilemma. I should note that if the kid has asbergers things get way more complicated so I'm mostly talking about ADHD/ADD.

Personally I think you should be careful about diagnosing a kid with something just because they're a hyper kid and can get distracted. I would also work on diet first. This kinda ties into the whole food thread we have floating around here somewhere but if your kid is eating like shit that would be your first battle to fight. Make sure they're getting the proper nutrients. It's amazing how affected your body is by a lack of proper nutrition and vitamins. Also, sunlight/vitamin D makes a massive difference. This should be obvious during the winter to many but you gotta get your kid to go outdoors and not just be on the computer all the time. Not sure about how physical exercise fits into all this but you might as well get that one dealt with at the same time you get the kid to go outdoors.

After that, start looking at medication with their doctor.
 
Last edited:

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,462
0
0
As much as I dislike it, my wife is one of those people who turns on the TV as soon as she gets up, even if she has no intention to watch; she likes the background noise. Typically it's just the news.

We let him watch cartoons for a limited amount of time (typically no more than 30 minutes) starting around probably around age 2. Too young, I know. Hindsight. He'll take 'screen time' any chance he gets - totally different from his older sister, who's in the same environment and got cartoons at a similar age/exposure level.

We got a Fire last year. There are a number of games on it, mostly educational (though it hasn't always been this way). Use time crept up to almost an hour/day, most days at one point and we've drastically cut back on it. For months it's been ~30 minutes on weekends only.

I'm crystal clear that this may be our fault in whole or - more likely imo - in part. I believe at least part of this is genetic; many of the behaviors I see in him remind me of myself at his age. I'm interested in saving him some of that stress.



Yep. But is the difference a change from constant class and team sport disruptions and constant distraction to active, happy participation?

It's not turning him into a zombie.

Trust me, I'm reticent about the medication; I'm one of those weirdos who actively avoids pills as a rule. But as I've mentioned before in this thread, I see my kid having a hard time doing the this thread and it's my job to do whatever I can.



I've only found out about the age recommendation through this thread (but had similar reservations before it). We're just a few weeks from 6, and he's a big kid, so perhaps that figured in. I'm looking at the FDA guide and digging up studies currently.

His issues are, as redundant as it seems to type out, attention centered. If the activity is something super active, he's fine. If it's something he likes and requires concentration (coloring and Lego, mostly) he can stick with it. Outside that, he struggles. He loves playing soccer and basketball - can't wait to go to practice/games but once there if he's idle on the field or bench for 30 seconds, he completely loses focus to the extent the pack of kids with the ball could rumble right past him without him noticing. Afterward he's upset with himself over it. Not for long, but he is.

It's challenging him similarly socially and scholastically. He's a bright kid; a natural problem and puzzle solver. I don't think he (or all kids, as alluded above) needs to get As but I also don't think he deserves to fall (farther) behind because I didn't act when I should have.

I know what you're thinking - he's a 5(almost 6)-year old. And a boy. But I've been watching him among his peers for a long time and it's just not in the same league.

Your kid sounds completely normal.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |