- Feb 22, 2007
- 16,240
- 7
- 76
I don't have Photoshop, but I might consider getting CS5 just for the Content Aware Fill!
Gimp can do the same thing and it's free! That said.. it's still an awesome feature.
I am part of the CS5 testers and now can talk about it , so if anyone has questions about it just ask and I will answer what I can.
My biggest gripe is lack of support for ATI video cards. You get acceleration in photoshop but not in anything else . The new premiere mercury engine only supports nvidia cuda so most of the new features are not usable in real time. You can chance things but the video will stop playing like before.
I figured something was up when they said they said 'increased support for 3d accelerator cards, like nvidia.'
Do you think they'll put some more work into ATI support or that they'll just stay in favor of nvidia?
Yes it's free, and it sucks compared to Photoshop.
I doubt it. They are using cuda and currently there is no easy way to go from cuda to ATI methods like OpenCL. ATI is partly to blame here for not going after the professional market the way nvidia has done.
I find GIMP incredibly unintuitive and I am looking to upgrade from CS2 PS to CS 5 PS for $199.Gimp can do the same thing and it's free! That said.. it's still an awesome feature.
I find GIMP incredibly unintuitive and I am looking to upgrade from CS2 PS to CS 5 PS for $199.
Weren't the cs5 cuda features limited to quadros and a few of the higher end nvidia cards? I dont think anything below a gtx 260 has support, it might be a cuda version restriction.
So far the only non-quadro card that Adobe has certified is a GTX-285. I'm curious to see if the GTX-470 or 480 will be included.
http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/systemreqs/
Hopefully those are just "tested" cards and not some kind of hard lock against them.
From what I've read on the Adobe forums, hardware acceleration is not enabled on non-tested cards.
You still benefit from the software (CPU) portion of Adobe's new engine though.
That's incredibly lame, but I guess nvidia wants to sell their quadros. Weird that a single geforce made it in.
Wow I"m still using photoshop 6.0. I should consider upgrading.
This is something I will miss if I decide to go with Linux as my main OS. I can't stand gimp, it's a good effort, but I just find it less user friendly, and more tedious to do tasks that are very easy in photoshop.
I honestly don't think it has to do with Nvidia wanting to sell Quadros, otherwise a dinky $350-400 Geforce card wouldn't be included. Video encoding/rendering is extremely sensitive work. Since this is professional software, the hardware has to meet certain standards. It could even be frame buffer size requirements matter too.
It definitely has to be real hardware requirements, otherwise a GTX 295 would be allowed. Since it's slower than a GTX 285 when using a single GPU (it's two GTX 275's), that sort of makes sense.
I'm rather bumbed out myself though. Nvidia has been promising compelling cuda programs when my 8800gt came out. Now that they're finally here I can't really use them
Oh you should see the content-aware features coming out in CS5. They are incredible:
http://cs5.org/?p=624
As always, it must be added that this can be done in the GIMP.
Also, for people who don't like the GIMP interface, check out GIMPShop, it makes it look and function more like photoshop.
For those who don't even need the power that gimp and photoshop offer and want something simply but fairly powerful to use, check out Paint.Net.
Adobe's online version of photoshop might be worth a look see too.