Should a homosexual couple be automatically denied from adopting a child?
Should a homosexual couple be automatically denied from adopting a child?
Yes. And now let me get my lawn chair and popcorn for the morning show.
What if the adoption agency is a religious institution that doesn't approve of gays and gay marriage? Should the government be allowed to oppress their religious "freedom"?
Someone post the link to that story of the 11 year old boy whom wanted a sex change operation (was raised by two lesbians).
Someone post the link to that story of the 11 year old boy whom wanted a sex change operation (was raised by two lesbians).
Gays decided to live a lifestyle in which no children will be produced. They should not take children away from parents who by some condition or illness can not reproduce.
I would have liked an option for 'No, unless the homosexual couple was unqualified for reasons other than their sexuality.'
Given the choices, I went with the last one.
Religious freedom should stop when it infringes on other people's rights.What if the adoption agency is a religious institution that doesn't approve of gays and gay marriage? Should the government be allowed to oppress their religious "freedom"?
Religious freedom should stop when it infringes on other people's rights.
They decided, huh? Still ignoring current scientific findings I see.I like this answer in the poll
"Yes, unless no qualified heterosexual couple can be found in the same timeframe"
Gays decided to live a lifestyle in which no children will be produced. They should not take children away from parents who by some condition or illness can not reproduce.
That article should make everyone question how well gays can provide a stable family. An 11 year old wants a sex change? Something is wrong there.
I know what article you are talking, the picture showed the boy wearing glasses and dressed up like a girl.
Is this really the case, that a gay couple would be taking a child from a straight couple? Are there more children available for adoption than there are adoptive parents, or vice versa?
Religious freedom should stop when it infringes on other people's rights.
I don't believe it is a human right to adopt a child. Of course, denial should not be arbitrary either, but that's different from saying it's a right.
So a qualified heterosexual couple doesn't have the right to adopt a child? I wonder why do you believe that?I don't believe it is a human right to adopt a child. Of course, denial should not be arbitrary either, but that's different from saying it's a right.
So a qualified heterosexual couple doesn't have the right to adopt a child? I wonder why do you believe that?
Yes. And now let me get my lawn chair and popcorn for the morning show.
In this instance, they cannot be forced to violate their religion. The first amendment protects them from government domination of religion.
As long as they don't accept government funding.