Adrian Peterson calls NFL "modern day slavery"

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,930
5,802
126
It's pretty much simply what I (and some others) have said earlier. The owners hold all the cards, and the players are commodities that they have little respect for. If they need to eek out a win, it may come at the expense of someone's dodgy knee that needs time to heal. Many owners could give two shits about the long-term health of their players. Hell, if your RB is carrying the ball 400 times a season, no biggy. Just cut him after he turns into a glass doll and sign some youngster to take over.

It simply amounts to the possession mentality. It may exist in some construction jobs and other labor intense jobs, but the stakes are much higher in the NFL world.

Was slavery a poor choice of words? Sure. But it meets the general point of the players being possessions who have little to no choice on what to do once their contracts are signed.

Ignore the money aspect, as that is clearly not what AP is referring to. Other than that, shouldn't be too hard of a concept for you to grasp.

lol ok ... let's ignore the contract part while we'er at it too!
 

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,401
0
76
Except the money aspect is the biggest aspect.

Yea - you're getting used and abused. That's football. That's the sports you agreed to play. But...you're getting paid potentially millions upon millions of dollars to do so. You aren't doing it because you have to.

Defend him all you want - he's wrong. He's very, very wrong. They agree to the hard work that comes with an NFL contract because they're getting paid large sums of money to do so. If you are of sane mind, you cannot just remove the money aspect from the equation, because its the most important aspect. Its what the owners and players are BOTH fighting for here.

Somehow that concept is lost among some people here.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
175
106
I'm with rudeguy. Country is in a recession and the NFL is going to strike because they don't think they're making enough millions of dollars. Ridiculous.

This. I wish the entire country would go on an attendance strike for a year and not go to a single football game to teach these fuckheads what hard times REALLY feel like.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,429
3,533
126
Was slavery a poor choice of words? Sure. But it meets the general point of the players being possessions who have little to no choice on what to do once their contracts are signed.

Is that so? They are not paid for their work? They have no legal rights as a person and are considered a posseion, not a human being? They can't vote? Who they sleep with/marry is decided for them by their NFL team owner? They live in sub-par to abysmal living conditions?

And here I thought they had a choice in all this...

The general point of slavery is that you are bound in servitute as a piece of property. Clearly this is not the case (Hint: Slaves did not have unions) and it has zero legal standing. AP is afforded the exact same rights as any other citizen of the US

Ignore the money aspect,

Ooooooh, so if we ignore the differences this is like slavery! I get it now
 
Last edited:

LumbergTech

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2005
3,622
1
0
dumb guy, but i really dont care if he argues they should receive a bigger cut of the revenue that they generate
 

thegimp03

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2004
7,426
2
81
It's pretty much simply what I (and some others) have said earlier. The owners hold all the cards, and the players are commodities that they have little respect for. If they need to eek out a win, it may come at the expense of someone's dodgy knee that needs time to heal. Many owners could give two shits about the long-term health of their players. Hell, if your RB is carrying the ball 400 times a season, no biggy. Just cut him after he turns into a glass doll and sign some youngster to take over.

It simply amounts to the possession mentality. It may exist in some construction jobs and other labor intense jobs, but the stakes are much higher in the NFL world.

Was slavery a poor choice of words? Sure. But it meets the general point of the players being possessions who have little to no choice on what to do once their contracts are signed.

Ignore the money aspect, as that is clearly not what AP is referring to. Other than that, shouldn't be too hard of a concept for you to grasp.

You missed a point here. The players are playing voluntarily. They aren't being forced to play. If they don't like how they're being treated by the owners, then they can quit or retire at any time.
 

fustercluck

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2002
7,404
0
71
Bringing up Slavery is just a complete joke in this case. Why is anyone even trying to defend him...or see his side of things here? Vikings fans?

Players bring this up from time to time, they're always making millions of dollars and it always makes them look like total douchebags.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
Bringing up Slavery is just a complete joke in this case. Why is anyone even trying to defend him...or see his side of things here? Vikings fans?

Players bring this up from time to time, they're always making millions of dollars and it always makes them look like total douchebags.

As a Vikings fan this is just another stupid thing on top of the pile of crap we've had to deal with the the past couple years. All the Favre drama, including his epic shitting of the bed last year, our stadium collapsing, the possibility of the Vikings leaving for LA, the added possibility of a lockout which could mean the Vikings never play in Minnesota again...

Adrian Peterson is the only superstar player on the team right now* and he just made an ass of himself, so I don't know. I always thought he was a good, stand-up guy. Maybe a bit immature sometimes (he's gotten a few speeding tickets for going WAY too fast) but not dumb. Guess I was wrong about that last one.

*no offense to any of the other great players on the Vikings... but with Favre gone, AP is now the face of the team, easily the most famous current player.
 
Last edited:

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
Ignore the money aspect, as that is clearly not what AP is referring to. Other than that, shouldn't be too hard of a concept for you to grasp.

Isn't the money part a big part of being an NFL player vs. being a slave?

Why don't we ignore the free health care, free travel, free food and earning potential from endorsements and broadcasting.

While we're at it, let's ignore the freedom to retire and enter an different line of work. We should also ignore being the envy of thousands of people.

Yeah, once you ignore all of those, being an NFL player is just like being a slave.

MotionMan
 

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
Is that so? They are not paid for their work? They have no legal rights as a person and are considered a posseion, not a human being? They can't vote? Who they sleep with/marry is decided for them by their NFL team owner? They live in sub-par to abysmal living conditions?

And here I thought they had a choice in all this...

The general point of slavery is that you are bound in servitute as a piece of property. Clearly this is not the case (Hint: Slaves did not have unions) and it has zero legal standing. AP is afforded the exact same rights as any other citizen of the US



Ooooooh, so if we ignore the differences this is like slavery! I get it now

Man you guys are sure caught up on this. Slavery was a poor choice of words... who is questioning that? The tie being made to slavery is that of a possession. There employment is essentially dictated post contract by teams with things such as exclusive rights tenders, franchise tags, and things of that nature. Furthermore, their bodies are subjected to a level of physical pain that most common office workers and even construction workers cannot handle. Players essentially being viewed as frail if they can't play through a vicious blow to the head. Once the contract is signed and dotted, the players are more or less the property of the team in their chosen profession. They have little right with respect to their profession even when the contract is up due to certain levels of control that owners have (mentioned above).

Again, if you'd get over the poor use of the word slavery, you might actually start to think about what he's talking about.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
they are on strike because the 'pro player safety' NFL wants them to play MORE, pay them LESS, and wont open their books to their employees

the 18 game seasons is bullshit and should never happen, and of course makes Goodell look like a fool as he has tried to 'champion' player safety all year and is now asking them to play even more





slavery was a poor choice of wording due the connotations it still has in this society, and beacuse 90% of people(including most of this board) think all NFL players make 10+ mil a year and have huge houses all over and drive tons of ferraris

18 games is to many? Wow, so EVERY OTHER MAJOR SPORT plays way more games than that. Baseball is the only one that isn't anywhere near as physical as football.
Hockey is far more physical than football and requires a much higher level of endurance and athletisism and thye play 82 regualr games a year, and as many as 28 post season games.
Football players are pansies and candy assess.
The ironic part is they complain that the owners take to much money, but they, the player want more money too. The owners are the ones that foot the bill. They put a huge amount of money into the team to make it and keep it viable.

All the griping and moaning from the players is just the new American dream of making sure you have more money than the next guy.
There's a reason most NFL player/ and most professional sports players, play sports. Because they are dumber than a box of rocks.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Man you guys are sure caught up on this. Slavery was a poor choice of words... who is questioning that? The tie being made to slavery is that of a possession.

equally as poor a choice of words. Pro athletes have to deal with pain? They limit certain career options when they voluntarily sign a contract? Cry me a river. I'm completely disinterested in the ongoing owner/player battle and tend to side with the players on most things, but i don't want to hear whiny shit about being treated like a possession, especially not from the $10m man.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
Man you guys are sure caught up on this. Slavery was a poor choice of words... who is questioning that? The tie being made to slavery is that of a possession. There employment is essentially dictated post contract by teams with things such as exclusive rights tenders, franchise tags, and things of that nature. Furthermore, their bodies are subjected to a level of physical pain that most common office workers and even construction workers cannot handle. Players essentially being viewed as frail if they can't play through a vicious blow to the head. Once the contract is signed and dotted, the players are more or less the property of the team in their chosen profession. They have little right with respect to their profession even when the contract is up due to certain levels of control that owners have (mentioned above).

Again, if you'd get over the poor use of the word slavery, you might actually start to think about what he's talking about.

Post-contract: Are the players unaware of how the NFL works before they sign their contract voluntarily?

Exclusive rights tenders, franchise tags: Do you have any clue of the history of the NFL in regards to player movement? Do you have any clue how much a franchise player gets paid?!?

Common office workers and even construction workers: Those employees do not have minimum salaries in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, with free food, free health care, etc...

Chosen profession: Chosen, not forced upon them.

MotionMan
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
Man you guys are sure caught up on this. Slavery was a poor choice of words... who is questioning that? The tie being made to slavery is that of a possession. There employment is essentially dictated post contract by teams with things such as exclusive rights tenders, franchise tags, and things of that nature. Furthermore, their bodies are subjected to a level of physical pain that most common office workers and even construction workers cannot handle. Players essentially being viewed as frail if they can't play through a vicious blow to the head. Once the contract is signed and dotted, the players are more or less the property of the team in their chosen profession. They have little right with respect to their profession even when the contract is up due to certain levels of control that owners have (mentioned above).

Again, if you'd get over the poor use of the word slavery, you might actually start to think about what he's talking about.

HE made the choice to sign on that dotted line. Accept the consiquences of your actions. He used "slavery" as an attempt to get noticed and try to play the race card to make the owners to back down.
Instead of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson jumping up and down about this, I'd find it hilarious if David Duke spoke out about this. LOL
 

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
This. I wish the entire country would go on an attendance strike for a year and not go to a single football game to teach these fuckheads what hard times REALLY feel like.

Yes, the fans should totally do that. God, what can these players being thinking. They should really just bend over and let the owners take 90% of the revenue.

You have to realize that hard times are presently not affecting the NFL (at least economically). Their revenues are actually still growing. The only thing being argued about is who deserves what portion of the pie. IMO, players deserve a portion > 50% because the revenue would simply not be there without them. There would be no NFL without the players, and fans don't pay 100s or 1000s of dollars to go see Eric Crouch throw a TD pass to John Standeford. They would, however, spend 100s or 1000s of dollars to go see Peyton Manning throw a TD pass to Reggie Wayne.

The NFL is an entertainment industry. The entertainers subject themselves to a high degree of bodily harm for a sizeable paycheck. If they're sport is worth x billion a year, you better damned well bet that they are going to want a fair cut of x.

As for AP, he's a tool. He used the word slavery where it should not have been used. That aside, I am sure we will see some significant changes in the structure of the NFL. That is due to people like AP, and more so do to many others, who stand up for their rights (as part of a Union) to protect the interests of the players, both past and present.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,312
12
81
There would be no NFL without the players, and fans don't pay 100s or 1000s of dollars to go see Eric Crouch throw a TD pass to John Standeford. They would, however, spend 100s or 1000s of dollars to go see Peyton Manning throw a TD pass to Reggie Wayne.

So when Payton and Wayne retire, the NFL will shut down? Too bad

The NFL is bigger than the individual players (Something people like Ocho and TO forget). If these players don't like it, they can retire and get jobs that are less taxing for their bodies, but, of course, do not pay as well and do not feed their egos.

The line to take their place starts way down there.........

MotionMan
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
You're an idiot.

Turf toe ring a bell?

Ever notice how the more money a football player makes the less he's willing to do. There are exceptions, but this is normally the rule. Most of the big "stars" in the NFL are Prima Donnas.

90% of NFL players are there solely because they like the money.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
So when Payton and Wayne retire, the NFL will shut down? Too bad

The NFL is bigger than the individual players (Something people like Ocho and TO forget). If these players don't like it, they can retire and get jobs that are less taxing for their bodies, but, of course, do not pay as well and do not feed their egos.

The line to take their place starts way down there.........

MotionMan

Not to mention there is always someone waiting in the wings. There is a steady stream of prospective players that would kill to play in the NFL.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |