Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: 6000SUX
By the way, I never said before, but I was in the MIDDLE lane of a three-lane highway, not that it matters. It was a miracle that the accident caused by the tailgater didn't involve more people. I was initially cruising at about 75MPH in a 65 zone when I hit the brakes. One of the witnesses said it looked like he hit the gas instead of the brake. None of this has anything to do with the illegality and moral reprehensibility of tailgating; just thought I'd share.
You come in here all high and almighty law abiding citizen and you yourself admit to breaking the law.
If you weren't breaking the law to begin with and then slwoing down, this scofflaw may have just gone around you another way.
Your Vigilantism not only caused the wreck, but Insurance Fraud as well since you admittted to speeding to begin with.
Kettle meet pot.
I was driving with the flow of traffic. I never claimed to be high and mighty, and I never said that I never sped in my life. Where are you finding this bullshit information, in your other split personality?
I never committed insurance fraud. You obviously know nothing of traffic law.
The speeding would only be considered if it were a factor in the accident.
I am also not a vigilante. The tailgater invaded my space, I responded. It's as if someone spit in your face in a bar, and you responded. I didn't take the law into my own hands, because I wasn't intent on enforcing any law; I merely wanted my space and safety back.
Like it or not, no amount of blather will change the law. Tailgating is a crime. It can have very serious consequences, too. Nothing will change the fact that the tailgater caused the accident in my case.