Looks like even Barr may have his limits:
President Trump wanted Attorney General William P. Barr to hold a news conference declaring the commander in chief had broken no laws during a phone call in which he pressed his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate a political rival, though Barr ultimately declined to do so, people familiar with the matter said.
The request from Trump traveled from the president, to other White House officials, and eventually to the Justice Department. The president has mentioned Barr’s declination to associates in recent weeks, saying he wished Barr would have held the news conference, Trump advisers say.
In recent weeks, the Justice Department has sought some distance from the White House, particularly on matters relating to the burgeoning controversy over Trump’s dealings on Ukraine and the impeachment inquiry they sparked.
—-
LOL, “Yo AG, my number one lawyer! Remember that thing you did with the Mueller Report? Can you do that press conference thing again for Ukraine? Just tell everyone we broke no laws... or at least that I broke no laws. K thx bye!”
Looks like even Barr may have his limits:
LOL, “Yo AG, my number one lawyer! Remember that thing you did with the Mueller Report? Can you do that press conference thing again for Ukraine? Just tell everyone we broke no laws... or at least that I broke no laws. K thx bye!”
Looks like even Barr may have his limits:
President Trump wanted Attorney General William P. Barr to hold a news conference declaring the commander in chief had broken no laws during a phone call in which he pressed his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate a political rival, though Barr ultimately declined to do so, people familiar with the matter said.
The request from Trump traveled from the president, to other White House officials, and eventually to the Justice Department. The president has mentioned Barr’s declination to associates in recent weeks, saying he wished Barr would have held the news conference, Trump advisers say.
In recent weeks, the Justice Department has sought some distance from the White House, particularly on matters relating to the burgeoning controversy over Trump’s dealings on Ukraine and the impeachment inquiry they sparked.
—-
LOL, “Yo AG, my number one lawyer! Remember that thing you did with the Mueller Report? Can you do that press conference thing again for Ukraine? Just tell everyone we broke no laws... or at least that I broke no laws. K thx bye!”
Many people, a number of them on this forum, openly stated that they voted for Trump because they wanted to burn it all down. Now they are upset because everything is on fire.Let the nation burn down into a heap of ashes so long as Trump is leading the way? Is that it?
Too late, Barr has already put himself in the traitor camp.
Citation? Be ready to defend your argument.Biden HAS dumbly admitted his Quid pro quo ON VIDEO and gets no attention at all. Tell me the democrats are so honest and explain this.
Ok follow the bouncing ball while I explain foreign policy vs personal favors...Biden HAS dumbly admitted his Quid pro quo ON VIDEO and gets no attention at all. Tell me the democrats are so honest and explain this.
So history repeats itself. Remember? Just replace Sessions with Barr. Almost the same wording.
Right, so the Ukraine had someone not doing their job (halting corruption), so the US pressured them to get rid of that guy in favor of someone better, in exchange for benefits.Citation:
Now what was the quid Biden asked for vs the quid Trump asked for and what’s the quo Biden held vs the quo Trump held.Citation:
Biden HAS dumbly admitted his Quid pro quo ON VIDEO and gets no attention at all. Tell me the democrats are so honest and explain this.
Did you actually read the responses? Did you even try understand or are you just being a good little Trump boy?And yet in the Trump case, ALL quid pro quo's are impeachable defenses, right?
No, just the illegal ones. Nobody gave three shits about the legal asks he's made (aside from general competence concerns).And yet in the Trump case, ALL quid pro quo's are impeachable offenses, right?
Citation? I don't recall Ukraine doing a damned thing aside from their president briefly considering accepting the aforementioned illegal quid pro quo.Seeing as how the Ukraine was a major player in the attempt to frame President Trump as TRAITOR
Yeah we know that. Do you actually know why, though?I will admit, I hate the Democats.
Quid pro quo's are not illegal. Every trade negotiation is a quid pro quo. All transactions are quid pro quo. It literally just means 'this for that'. What is illegal is Trump using the power of his office to extort a foreign government (or anyone really) for personal favors.And yet in the Trump case, ALL quid pro quo's are impeachable offenses, right?
And yet in the Trump case, ALL quid pro quo's are impeachable offenses, right?