Humpy
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2011
- 4,463
- 596
- 126
Planes can go through storms just fine.
In light of the obvious, that seems like an odd way to start off a post that just gets worse.
Planes can go through storms just fine.
In light of the obvious, that seems like an odd way to start off a post that just gets worse.
Do you also think buses can't drive on roads because buses crash from time to time?
Wouldn't you just fly above the clouds to avoid the issue? At least temporally giving you some more options.
Lovely. I wondered if people would take it the wrong way. By the sounds of it, both of you thought I was referring to aliens or some conspiracy.
Three flights "missing" (to clarify, I quote because one of you quoted, not to mean it's a conspiracy), all operated by carriers from one country in a single year -- yes, other planes go "missing", but three in one year is a bit of a bigger problem. I was thinking of a possible culture or government oversight issue like the one Malcolm Gladwell noted about Korean Air.
Woooooo aliens!
So wtf is going on? Is the blackbox and GPS beacon not working this time too?
The folks on at airliners.net are drawing more parallels to AF447 and pitot tube freezing problems.
If this is another MH370 then I have to think the 'airplane hacking' theory may have more credence. North Korea anyone?
Wikipedia says AirAsia is headquartered in Malaysia. When does it stop being just a coincidence...
I bet there have been multiple non-Malaysian crashes.
At this point, it's only "missing" because the search isn't done. It just happened. It takes a while to get the right crews to that location.
E
YOU don't get what he is saying. Freshly crashed and not reached yet is not "missing" in the Flight 370 sense and yet people started calling it that moments after it disappeared.
Let's say that I crashed my car and responders were now coming to find me based on my planned route and last known position. My car isn't really "missing" until they have looked there to realize that it is not where they would expect to find it even if something went wrong.
Is the plane missing because the debris washed up three hours later versus 12 minutes? Is is missing because it took more than 12 hours to locate the crash site? Where do we draw that line? Give it a couple days before you declare this a mystery. Let them get a boat out there to listen for the pings. Sheesh.
So wtf is going on? Is the blackbox and GPS beacon not working this time too?
The folks on at airliners.net are drawing more parallels to AF447 and pitot tube freezing problems.
If this is another MH370 then I have to think the 'airplane hacking' theory may have more credence. North Korea anyone?
Profits over people. The airliner knew the weather condition. Hailstorms and a large number of severe thunderstorm with tops as high as 50,000ft. And the flight path was so tight that they were denied the deviation to flight level 380.
They should have delayed all flights until the conditions permitted a safe flight.
Wikipedia says AirAsia is headquartered in Malaysia. When does it stop being just a coincidence...
... WTF?! They force flights through the center of storms due to strict flight paths? Having no allowances or plan B is insane.
Or...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi...ng&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=news_central
It has been a horrible year for air disasters.
The airline is based in Jakarta, Indonesia, not Malaysia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia_AirAsia
Planes can go through storms just fine. They would just prefer not to in order to minimize risk. Thunderstorms specifically don't get flown through on purpose, and dangerous cells normally show up on doppler.
A plane isn't going to go underneath a storm because that would be dumb. In this case, it doesn't seem that they had a viable route to go around like they normally would.
And if a plane is also flying on a similar path in the air route above another plane, which they commonly do because air traffic is extremely contested space, no sane traffic controller is going to allow the plane to change altitude. Planes need to be kept very very far away from each other.
The above scenario could change if there is some sort of emergency declared by the plane to controllers, but in this case, there wasn't. And if the event really only took 5 minutes from the request, an Airplane simply cannot change altitude that fast on demand. We're talking like 500 feet per minute at best and the plane would have had to climb I believe 4000 feet to make it to the next lane above.
You need to know anything at all about aircraft before you spout nonsense. The Would'a, could'a, and should'a around here is ridiculous at times.