Ventiva creates static electricity and potential to fry other electronics.
Yea you can coat the PCB, but what about other parts and devices that aren't coated? Coating isn't perfect either.
I like the Frore better. Like someone said make a thinner version and use it as a heatsink fin. And the purpose of the fins won't be actually moving air but just to break the boundary barrier(thus using minimal power), and you'd have a normal fan moving the air for more effective cooling.
Frore claimed that they would double device performance every 2 years.
Well.... 2 years gone by since they first announced AirJet, and no 2x perf product announced at CES.
If they can't even deliver on that promise promptly after the first 2 years, I have serious doubts about them doing it multiple times.
Maybe by "doubling" they meant by making it twice as large and use twice the power. Shady marketing for sure. What they need is double the performance per watt of the same device, so same power use at double the CFM or half the power use at same CFM.
1W for 5W is a disaster. This is the real reason no one is using it. Think they need to increase the perf/watt by 3-4x, so 0.25-0.3W at 5W dissipated or 1W power at 15-20W dissipated.
The only thing worse in efficiency are peltier coolers. Saying it's "solid state" is marketing. Like
@aigomorla said, if this tech was so good, then you could use it for other applications such as for blowers, fans, actual heat pumps, and eventually airplanes!
In traditional laptops, the fans turn off and the SoC is passively cooled by the heatsinks and some little baseline airflow. That doesn't quite work with just a vapour chamber (zero heat dissipation) alone, so the AirJets need to be constantly on, no?
That makes terrible somehow worse. So peak perf/watt needs to go up 3-4x and idle perf/watt needs to go up what, 10x, 20x?