Al Gore's son arrested for DUI again

[blackllotus]

Originally posted by: IGBT

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: Hacp

Originally posted by: IGBT
..Mrs.Bill Clinton will pardon him when she becomes president.

Its nice to know that some people form the right have some sense. Thank you for ackowledging that Hilary is the best candidtate running for president.

Winner != Best Candidate

See: George W Bush

..I'm still a reg.democrat. but I finished with the clintons. But I also realize there's enough of you clinton koolaid drinkers around to foist them back into parlor. Then you can re-enter your self induced stupor and try to pretend it's 1999 again.

Lol at the idea that Whoozeyerdaddy is a "Clinton koolaid drinker"

 

[IGBT]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
This guy needs some help.

Rehab at the least.
Jail if the law calls for it.

It sounds like it may take some jail time for him to get the message.
BTW Do you think this has any effect on Gore if he decided to run for President?

..doubt it. He'll get the medical marijuana/dui/alcoholic vote. Nearly everybody out here will vote for algore.

 

[IGBT]

Originally posted by: jrenz
That crazy Gore kid is at it again. Maybe he should hook up with the Bush daughters and go clubbing.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288047,00.html

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Al Gore III, son of the former vice president, was arrested in California early Wednesday morning for driving under the influence of drugs.

Gore III was allegedly driving at speeds over 100 mph when he was pulled over in Laguna Hills in Orange County, Calif., south of Los Angeles. Police found marijuana and prescription drugs Xanax, Vicodin and Soma, public information officer Jim Armonino told KTTV in Los Angeles. Gore supposedly had no prescriptions for the pharmaceuticals.

Gore, 24, was being held in the men's jail in Santa Ana. This is the second time he was arrested on a marijuana possession charge. Police in Montgomery County, Md., pulled over Gore in December 2003 and noticed the smell of pot and open windows and sunroof despite the freezing temperature.

Gore and his two male passengers at the time were charged with a misdemeanor count of possession of marijuana and released. Gore was also ticketed for reckless driving by North Carolina police in August 2000, and military police arrested him for drunk driving near a military base in Virginia in September 2002.</end quote></div>

..ya. the son has a "drug fever" x2. just think how big his drug footprint is. mabe he can purchase "clean credits" somewhere to offset his drug consumption.

 

[bamacre]

Pathetic. Our family members are shipped off to Iraq, while they are home popping pills and smoking the reefer.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: blackllotus
I didn't know a Prius could hit 100

:laugh:

 

[IGBT]

Originally posted by: bamacre
Pathetic. Our family members are shipped off to Iraq, while they are home popping pills and smoking the reefer.

..ya but atleast Bill Clinton can't run for pres.again. He'll have to make due with his pills n dope.

 

[imported_Shivetya]

Originally posted by: CycloWizard
I'll never understand these guys. If you have that much money, why don't you just hire a driver or at least a cab?

because in the end they are still human like the rest of us?



and... why is this news? Just because some well known's brat gets in trouble its news for us?

 

[imported_Shivetya]

Originally posted by: blackllotus
I didn't know a Prius could hit 100

105 actually, using gas and electric

 

[Conservationist]

Originally posted by: jrenz
That crazy Gore kid is at it again.

In all fairness, this should have nothing to do with the election.

I won't vote for Al Gore because he is a censor of popular music (Google PMRC).

 

[sandorski]

I got a chuckle when the news pointed out that he was in a Hybrid Car.

 

[Narmer]

I think him driving that Hybrid Prius at 100 mph is some type of rebellion against his dad.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.

Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.

 

[Fern]

Well, given he was busted in SoCal, I'm thinking his sentance is already up. Even if he gets one.

I'm thinking of Paris Hilton. Didn't it take her three times before she got jail? And many complain because she got more than three days - the SoCal normal?

Gore III needs to be a little smarter. If he drove around with Lindsey Lohan I doubt there would have been a pot bust. She got caught with coke and not charged.

Why are they picking on Gore III?



Fern

 

[CPA]

stupid-azz parents.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.

Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.</end quote></div>


Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?

LOL, I'm all pissed off? You remember the cop thread and all your whining about videos being edited, yet you continue to take Hillary Clinton's quote out of context. The only thing having a half truth in your sig proves is that your not to be trusted. Kind of like how on the cop shows when they show them in their locker room they all have padlocks on their lockers. LMAO, they can't even trust each other let alone an average citizen trusting them any farther then they can throw them.

No, BMW is right, you failed the test.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.</end quote></div>


Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?
</end quote></div>

LOL, I'm all pissed off? You remember the cop thread and all your whining about videos being edited, yet you continue to take Hillary Clinton's quote out of context. The only thing having a half truth in your sig proves is that your not to be trusted. Kind of like how on the cop shows when they show them in their locker room they all have padlocks on their lockers. LMAO, they can't even trust each other let alone an average citizen trusting them any farther then they can throw them.

No, BMW is right, you failed the test.

Yes, you've moaned and groaned about my sig several times, we have even been over it before, did you forget? Yes, Hillary was talking to a bunch of rich Democrats and tax cuts when she said that, no I do not think that the rich, Democrats or Republicans, should have any less of a tax cut than the rest of us.

Now, was she or was she not in favor of taking things (their money) away from them on behalf of the common good?

Anyways, wtf does a sig have to do with bringing up Bush in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with him? You lefties get absurdly obsessed with peoples sigs around here, first it was PJ, now its my sig.

BTW, are you so dumb that you think that the only people to EVER go in a locker room in a police station are police officers? You do realize that cleaning crews come in there right? Do you think that it would be a good idea to leave a locker with police uniforms, equipment, and possibly firearms unlocked when cleaning crews, maintainence crews, etc... have access to those locker rooms? I wasn't "whining" about videos being edited, I was explaining why cops might be against it, I figured that since I was a cop it might be a good idea to give the other side of the story, since people don't usually think about that. And in case you missed it in that thread, I am IN FAVOR of cops being video taped. Looks like you're 0 for 2 today. Better luck next time.

 

[jrenz]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.</end quote></div>


Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?
</end quote></div>

LOL, I'm all pissed off? You remember the cop thread and all your whining about videos being edited, yet you continue to take Hillary Clinton's quote out of context. The only thing having a half truth in your sig proves is that your not to be trusted. Kind of like how on the cop shows when they show them in their locker room they all have padlocks on their lockers. LMAO, they can't even trust each other let alone an average citizen trusting them any farther then they can throw them.

No, BMW is right, you failed the test.

So how is high school treating you?

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.</end quote></div>


Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?
</end quote></div>

LOL, I'm all pissed off? You remember the cop thread and all your whining about videos being edited, yet you continue to take Hillary Clinton's quote out of context. The only thing having a half truth in your sig proves is that your not to be trusted. Kind of like how on the cop shows when they show them in their locker room they all have padlocks on their lockers. LMAO, they can't even trust each other let alone an average citizen trusting them any farther then they can throw them.

No, BMW is right, you failed the test.</end quote></div>

Yes, you've moaned and groaned about my sig several times, we have even been over it before, did you forget? Yes, Hillary was talking to a bunch of rich Democrats and tax cuts when she said that, no I do not think that the rich, Democrats or Republicans, should have any less of a tax cut than the rest of us.

Now, was she or was she not in favor of taking things (their money) away from them on behalf of the common good?

Anyways, wtf does a sig have to do with bringing up Bush in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with him? You lefties get absurdly obsessed with peoples sigs around here, first it was PJ, now its my sig.

BTW, are you so dumb that you think that the only people to EVER go in a locker room in a police station are police officers? You do realize that cleaning crews come in there right? Do you think that it would be a good idea to leave a locker with police uniforms, equipment, and possibly firearms unlocked when cleaning crews, maintainence crews, etc... have access to those locker rooms? I wasn't "whining" about videos being edited, I was explaining why cops might be against it, I figured that since I was a cop it might be a good idea to give the other side of the story, since people don't usually think about that. And in case you missed it in that thread, I am IN FAVOR of cops being video taped. Looks like you're 0 for 2 today. Better luck next time.

From where I was standing, you were whining about cops being videotaped and then EDITED, The same thing you are doing with the quote of Hillary in your sig. So one of your posts gives the truth, the rest of them only show your out of context quote. Intellecuatally dishonest IMO.

So are you trying to tell me that cops don't steal and the only reason they lock their lockers is because of outsiders coming in? I want some of what your smoking. @ for 2 mu azz.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
JD50 said:
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!</end quote></div>

Well JD, you could have just as well been the second post in on the OP and said the same thing you said to me to jrenz about "his" post:

"So whats your point? Rich, powerfull, influential people and their kids can get away with anything? Quick, alert the press, this is breaking news!!!!"

Could you not?. Your response to me could be just as appropriate to the OP.

But you didn't. You will sit there and wait for someone to say the exact same thing about your "side". Like some devil's advocate policeman with a partisan moral compass. Just what is wrong with the political discourse in todays poitical world.

But I digress. My response does make me just as bad as you. Considering I don't know if jrenz had a partisan reason to post what he did.

Get it?

So, JD. I guess my "point" is: This was a test, and you passed with flying colors.




</end quote></div>


Yes, I'm sure it was just a "test", it had nothing to do with you being a blind partisan...:roll:

This thread was about Al Gore's son, not the evil Republicans. I know its tough to criticize one of you're own... So what was the point of your reply Eaglekeeper? He thinks that people shouldn't get off easy just because they are the kid of a politician, he didn't say that its ok when it happens to Republicans. You were the first person to even bring partisan politics to this thread (big surprise). I'd think that all of us agree that Republicans and Democrats alike should be held accountable for their actions. Why is it that conservatives are never allowed to bring Clinton up, but its perfectly acceptable to bring up Bush in every single thread? Maybe you were just going with the knee jerk "but Bush" response.

Maybe you should chance your name to ProfBMW540I6speed, since you seem to like throwing out random "tests". No more pop quizzes please.</end quote></div>

WTF are you babbling about? you have a out-of-context quote from one of the Clintons in your sig and your claiming conservative aren't allowed to bring them up??

You failed your own test.</end quote></div>


Ummm....I was talking about BILL Clinton. And you getting pissed off at the fact that I have a Clinton quote in my sig proves my point even further. I'd say about 90 percent of the time that Slick Willy is brought up in comparison to GWB we get hit with the retards claiming that we are incapable of any argument besides "but Clinton". Who asked you anyways?
</end quote></div>

LOL, I'm all pissed off? You remember the cop thread and all your whining about videos being edited, yet you continue to take Hillary Clinton's quote out of context. The only thing having a half truth in your sig proves is that your not to be trusted. Kind of like how on the cop shows when they show them in their locker room they all have padlocks on their lockers. LMAO, they can't even trust each other let alone an average citizen trusting them any farther then they can throw them.

No, BMW is right, you failed the test.</end quote></div>

Yes, you've moaned and groaned about my sig several times, we have even been over it before, did you forget? Yes, Hillary was talking to a bunch of rich Democrats and tax cuts when she said that, no I do not think that the rich, Democrats or Republicans, should have any less of a tax cut than the rest of us.

Now, was she or was she not in favor of taking things (their money) away from them on behalf of the common good?

Anyways, wtf does a sig have to do with bringing up Bush in threads that have absolutely nothing to do with him? You lefties get absurdly obsessed with peoples sigs around here, first it was PJ, now its my sig.

BTW, are you so dumb that you think that the only people to EVER go in a locker room in a police station are police officers? You do realize that cleaning crews come in there right? Do you think that it would be a good idea to leave a locker with police uniforms, equipment, and possibly firearms unlocked when cleaning crews, maintainence crews, etc... have access to those locker rooms? I wasn't "whining" about videos being edited, I was explaining why cops might be against it, I figured that since I was a cop it might be a good idea to give the other side of the story, since people don't usually think about that. And in case you missed it in that thread, I am IN FAVOR of cops being video taped. Looks like you're 0 for 2 today. Better luck next time.
</end quote></div>

From where I was standing, you were whining about cops being videotaped and then EDITED, The same thing you are doing with the quote of Hillary in your sig. So one of your posts gives the truth, the rest of them only show your out of context quote. Intellecuatally dishonest IMO.

So are you trying to tell me that cops don't steal and the only reason they lock their lockers is because of outsiders coming in? I want some of what your smoking. @ for 2 mu azz.

Wow, I guess if we go by your standard, every sig is edited, including your own.

And yes, Cops are 100 percent perfect, they never do anything wrong. But if by some chance you find one doing something wrong, we should point to it as an example of why cops can't be trusted and how horribly evil they are. And the fact that they have locks on their lockers is an even better example of why cops can't be trusted, we should just get rid of them all, we'll be much safer.

But you didn't answer my question, "Do you think that it would be a good idea to leave a locker with police uniforms, equipment, and possibly firearms unlocked when cleaning crews, maintainence crews, etc... have access to those locker rooms?"

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: JD50


And yes, Cops are 100 percent perfect, they never do anything wrong.

And with that remark I rest my case.

 

[Jmman]

I got a chuckle when I heard about this story. Drugged out environmentalist going 100mph in a freakin Prius...... Classic....

 

[jrenz]

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50


And yes, Cops are 100 percent perfect, they never do anything wrong.


</end quote></div>

And with that remark I rest my case.

Are you an idiot, or just retarded?

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: jrenz

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: JD50


And yes, Cops are 100 percent perfect, they never do anything wrong.


</end quote></div>

And with that remark I rest my case.

Are you an idiot, or just retarded?

Neither, I'm just know better then to argue with a fool, so buzz off.