- Oct 9, 1999
- 4,961
- 3,391
- 136
With the release of Alder Lake less than a week away and the "Lakes" thread having turned into a nightmare to navigate I thought it might be a good time to start a discussion thread solely for Alder Lake.
Any reviews out there talking temps? Curious how hot these chips run on a Z690 with DDR5 using air cooling.
Any reviews out there talking temps? Curious how hot these chips run on a Z690 with DDR5 using air cooling.
Yeah, the recent Cinebenchs are pretty unaffected by memory speed and cache sizes. It's probably why a few sites picked them for IPC testing for this benchmarking round.
https://www.computerbase.de/2021-11/intel-core-i9-12900k-i7-12700k-i5-12600k-test/2/With air cooling you’ll just be bouncing off the top thermal limits at 100C long before the chip runs out of TDP headroom.
Not many air coolers rated for 240W.
That’s if you render or something of course. Any good air cooler looks to be fine for non-power virus loads. If it worked for 10th Gen I9 you should be Ok.
Just to be clear... What do you think it would do with a 100% load@241 watt for HOURS, like prime95 ? I am trying to compare to when I did primegrid for a week, and my 5950x was creaming EVERYTHING, including my EPYC boxes. Its just a monster. I don't thing the 12900k would live on an air cooler for days under that load like my 5950x did. THIS is the problem I have with the 12900k.https://www.computerbase.de/2021-11/intel-core-i9-12900k-i7-12700k-i5-12600k-test/2/
12th gen was tested with the old 10th-gen, 11th gen scheme here (PL1 = 125w, PL2 = 150/190/241w, 56 sec), and even for a long load in Blender the 12900k only loses 12% perf, the 12700k loses 6% perf, and the 12600k loses no perf at all.
It'd be interesting to do more throuogh testing of the 12th gens with more stringent ~125w PL2s. For all intents and purposes the 12600k is already there by default and I suspect performance loss is not nearly as big on the i7s/i9s as implied by the power draw.
Finding large primes isn't exactly something what 99.99% of people would consider meaningful. Source: I'm a math student.Just to be clear... What do you think it would do with a 100% load@241 watt for HOURS, like prime95 ? I am trying to compare to when I did primegrid for a week, and my 5950x was creaming EVERYTHING, including my EPYC boxes. Its just a monster. I don't thing the 12900k would live on an air cooler for days under that load like my 5950x did. THIS is the problem I have with the 12900k.
As I said, the 12700k and the 12600k look great for gaming. But for full loads, the 12900k just can't take it IMO.
*glares in Optimus Prime*Finding large primes isn't exactly something what 99.99% of people would consider meaningful. Source: I'm a math student.
Just to be clear... What do you think it would do with a 100% load@241 watt for HOURS, like prime95 ? I am trying to compare to when I did primegrid for a week, and my 5950x was creaming EVERYTHING, including my EPYC boxes. Its just a monster. I don't thing the 12900k would live on an air cooler for days under that load like my 5950x did. THIS is the problem I have with the 12900k.
As I said, the 12700k and the 12600k look great for gaming. But for full loads, the 12900k just can't take it IMO.
Just to be clear... What do you think it would do with a 100% load@241 watt for HOURS, like prime95 ? I am trying to compare to when I did primegrid for a week, and my 5950x was creaming EVERYTHING, including my EPYC boxes. Its just a monster. I don't thing the 12900k would live on an air cooler for days under that load like my 5950x did. THIS is the problem I have with the 12900k.
As I said, the 12700k and the 12600k look great for gaming. But for full loads, the 12900k just can't take it IMO.
Well, you don't know me very well.... Thats the exception. I don't care about primes. It spends 24/7/365 @100% load trying to cure cancer.That was an example since people know prime stresses a CPU. From the multiple replies, its obvious nobody believes me, that its a hot CPU and would throttle down quickly and stay there under sustained load at 241 watts, where its optimal performance is supposed to be.Finding large primes isn't exactly something what 99.99% of people would consider meaningful. Source: I'm a math student.
that its a hot CPU and would throttle down quickly and stay there under sustained load.
Why would anyone run Prime95 for a week though? Folding proteins on the other hand is a useful endeavor. So why did you not ask how the CPU does in Folding@Home but talk about running primegrid on your 5950X CPU for a week?Well, you don't know me very well.... Thats the exception. I don't care about primes. It spends 24/7/365 @100% load trying to cure cancer.That was an example since people know prime stresses a CPU. From the multiple replies, its obvious nobody believes me, that its a hot CPU and would throttle down quickly and stay there under sustained load at 241 watts, where its optimal performance is supposed to be.
So you all believe what you want, I am done here with morons.
Well, you don't know me very well.... Thats the exception. I don't care about primes. It spends 24/7/365 @100% load trying to cure cancer.That was an example since people know prime stresses a CPU. From the multiple replies, its obvious nobody believes me, that its a hot CPU and would throttle down quickly and stay there under sustained load at 241 watts, where its optimal performance is supposed to be.
So you all believe what you want, I am done here with morons.
Why would anyone run Prime95 for a week though? Folding proteins on the other hand is a useful endeavor. So why did you not ask how the CPU does in Folding@Home but talk about running primegrid on your 5950X CPU for a week?
Primegrid is a DC project in BOINC. I volunteered for a week. The 5950x was a monster in that project. F@H(I am number 35 in the world) is done best with video cards.The CPU projects that I run are Rosetta@home (I am number 29 in the world) and WCG ( I am 76 in the world). Both of those are medical research projects.Why would anyone run Prime95 for a week though? Folding proteins on the other hand is a useful endeavor. So why did you not ask how the CPU does in Folding@Home but talk about running primegrid on your 5950X CPU for a week?
Integrated graphics? We're talking about integrated graphics? Not dedicated graphics, but integrated graphics?I know I'm a weirdo, but did anyone test the iGPU yet?
I love IGP! I edited my post above. Looks like a good uplift over UHD750 even with DDR4. If DDR5 does more for the IGP than it did for the CPU, it could be winner chicken dinner.Integrated graphics? We're talking about integrated graphics? Not dedicated graphics, but integrated graphics?
With GPU prices as they currently are, and what they are pointing to be priced at going forward now that both AMD and Nvidia have seen what people are will to pay to the retail, private parties on FS/FT forums like ours, and on Ebay, my next CPU choice will be one with integrated graphics as well.I love IGP! I edited my post above. Looks like a good uplift over UHD750 even with DDR4. If DDR5 does more for the IGP than it did for the CPU, it could be winner chicken dinner.
Never say never. But I grok. I play old games on my AMD APUs, to let my RTX and GTX cards rest. Not sure when value GPUs will return, so have to preserve the ones I have. My 5600G boosting to 4.65GHz vega 2.3GHz provides a great 1080p experience for almost my entire GOG library, and a fair percentage of Steam too.With GPU prices as they currently are, and what they are pointing to be priced at going forward now that both AMD and Nvidia have seen what people are will to pay to the retail, private parties on FS/FT forums like ours, and on Ebay, my next CPU choice will be one with integrated graphics as well.
Homey done playing the GPU pricing insanity game until (if ever) that GPU prices return to reasonable levels. I'm not dropping $1.5k+ on a video card.....ever.
Yeah I saw that as well when I looked over it again.I think there's a typo in their write-up. From the chart, it's clear that it's the 5900x that is 8% faster when both are at 88W. The 5950x is 16% faster than the 12900k when it is also at 88W. The problem really comes from Intel only having 8 performance cores, so trying to catch up to the 16 performance Zen 3 cores becomes a tall task and ADL has to start using larger and larger amounts of power to match the 16 cores once they are fed a bit more as well. I.e. the power curve becomes much steeper for the 12900k vs. the 5950x as higher performance levels are reached.
View attachment 52356
CPUs have come a long way in the last few decades having all of the protections now, with a 100% load@241 watt for years even on an air cooler the 12900k would just throttle down to whatever the cooling provides it wouldn't run at 241W just because you have set that in the bios.Just to be clear... What do you think it would do with a 100% load@241 watt for HOURS, like prime95 ? I am trying to compare to when I did primegrid for a week, and my 5950x was creaming EVERYTHING, including my EPYC boxes. Its just a monster. I don't thing the 12900k would live on an air cooler for days under that load like my 5950x did. THIS is the problem I have with the 12900k.
As I said, the 12700k and the 12600k look great for gaming. But for full loads, the 12900k just can't take it IMO.
BeQuiet Dark Rock Pro (4?) was on sale @ Newegg, and claimed to handle 240W TDP. But I think you would need a new mounting bracket.Not many air coolers rated for 240W.