zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,810
- 29,564
- 146
Originally posted by: NoCreativity
Originally posted by: Yzzim
Could some of you FF guys give me your input on this situation?
I'm in a league that was formed here in ATOT. The commissioner proposed a trade earlier this week.
I got:
Plaxico Burress
Steve Smith
He got:
Carson Palmer
Braylon Edwards
Now that Palmer is out today he asked for me to reverse the trade. I thought he was joking and rejected the trade. Now he's posted a Commissioner's Note:
Everyone I need your vote on the trade that was completed this week between my team (Parcell's Jap Plays) and Yzzimians.
I had proposed the trade because I was desperate for a QB and overpaid a bit to get one. The trade was slightly in the advantage of Yzzim but I was OK with it as I was getting the QB I needed.
It was reported today that Palmer would miss todays game and quite possibly more with an injury. The main reason for makeing the trade was for the QB. The trade now looks like Burress/Smith for B.Edwards which is clearly one sided.
I am putting the trade up to a vote to the owners here. If you feel it is too one sided then I can reverse the trade and the players will be returned to their rosters. I would need a majority vote (7) to overturn the deal.
Now I know some of you may say tough crap - injuries happen and whatnot. If that is the case then I would urge that maybe the two owners can work out another deal to compensate for the QB being hurt. Maybe trade Burress back in return for another WR or something.
I will not make any changes until the league decides. I will give it until 11:30pm Saturday next week to make the decision.
Thanks!
Now I don't play FF much, this is my second year playing. Is this normal? It doesn't seem fair, IMO.
Didn't realize it was one of the money leagues which means it's probably not smart to just quit if you have alread paid. The commish should have to live with a trade that lop sided since he proposed it. I can't even begin to think why he would propose that deal.
Anyway, looks like two members have already voted against you according to the other thread. Unfortunately I think you might lose the vote because the others feel the trade makes your team much better than the rest. Since it looks like odds might be stacked against you, maybe make a counter proposal that you get to keep one of the players he traded you and only switch one back. Only do this if it looks like everybody is going to vote to reverse the trade. Since he made a stupid move, he should lose something.
Lastly, if your counter offer isn't accepted and the vote isn't looking good, make sure to let everyone know that you are up for sale if you fall out of contention (i.e. throw games either for some compensation or just to whatch him fall down the standings). Or follow FallenHero's advice and trade your guys away to screw him over.
Actually, the problem appears to be that pending trades were never authorized to be up for league votes in the first place, giving the commissioner sole power over vetos. Had it been up to league vote, it would be on everyone else to review it when it comes up and offer their own input. If I were in that league, and not part of this trade, I would not vote, or at least vote in you favor, as it seems the rules are broken to begin with. It sounds like the commissioner with sole veto power would probably only intervene on trades that hurt his team.
It was his dumb decision and he should live with it. I could bring up the notorious Brian Roberts for Ugeuth Urbina trade to open up our baseball season a few years ago, but those of you that know a little about baseball can imagine how that turned out (...I did quite well )